I'd like to suggest an additional feature for the freemail plugin. If
you test the sending host through FCrDNS and determine that the sending
host is a freemail hostname (like google.com) then you should consider
it a freemail sender. Thus if the sending host is Google, but the
reply-to or an
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:37:13PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd like to suggest an additional feature for the freemail plugin. If
you test the sending host through FCrDNS and determine that the sending
host is a freemail hostname (like google.com) then you should consider
it a freemail
Henrik K wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:37:13PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd like to suggest an additional feature for the freemail plugin. If
you test the sending host through FCrDNS and determine that the sending
host is a freemail hostname (like google.com) then you should
Marc Perkel wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:37:13PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'd like to suggest an additional feature for the freemail plugin.
If you test the sending host through FCrDNS and determine that the
sending host is a freemail hostname (like google.com)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:21:32AM +0200, mouss wrote:
and it may be interesting to look in the body as well. some spam comes
from google (infected pc) but shows yahoo and hotmail as contact
addresses (the last I have seen has 3 addresses in the body:
hotmail.com, yahoo.com and yahoo.cn
Hello all.
I have just upgraded from SA 3.2.4 to 3.2.5 and ran sa-update to get the
latest rulesets (which also happens every night via a cronjob).
I got the following errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sa-update --channelfile
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sare-sa-update-channels.txt --gpgkey 856AA88A
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Arthur Dent wrote:
Hello all.
I have just upgraded from SA 3.2.4 to 3.2.5 and ran sa-update to get the
latest rulesets (which also happens every night via a cronjob).
I got the following errors:
[errors chopped]
Stopping spamd:
This is something that is probably so simple, but I'm tearing my hair out
trying to find how to do it.
At present I have a header line added as X-Spam-Flag: YES where SA has
scored over the threshold.
I want this in upper case as X-SPAM-FLAG: YES, rather than lower case
X-Spam-Flag: YES
The
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:46:13AM +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Arthur Dent wrote:
Hello all.
I have just upgraded from SA 3.2.4 to 3.2.5 and ran sa-update to get the
latest rulesets (which also happens every night via a cronjob).
I got the following errors:
[errors
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 01:40 +0200, mouss wrote:
mouss wrote:
Is there some way to grab the metadata from IPCountry to count the
number of countries that were involved in sending a mail, and set a
score based on that?
you mean catching the Junkman traveller?
you can try
header
Neither of the two messages at http://pastebin.com/m76e8b461
are bounce messages. They're both legitimate messages from the
CommuniGate Pro mailing list, yet they both hit
ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_MESSAGE. Comments?
--
Christopher Bort
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thehundredacre.net/
On 30.06.08 09:55, Christopher Bort wrote:
Neither of the two messages at http://pastebin.com/m76e8b461
are bounce messages. They're both legitimate messages from the
CommuniGate Pro mailing list, yet they both hit
ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE and BOUNCE_MESSAGE. Comments?
The From: is set to
On 06/30/08 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matus UHLAR - fantomas) wrote:
On 30.06.08 09:55, Christopher Bort wrote:
Neither of the two messages at http://pastebin.com/m76e8b461
are bounce messages. They're both legitimate messages from the
CommuniGate Pro mailing list, yet they both hit
McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 01:40 +0200, mouss wrote:
mouss wrote:
Is there some way to grab the metadata from IPCountry to count the
number of countries that were involved in sending a mail, and set a
score based on that?
you mean catching the Junkman
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:04 +0200, mouss wrote:
McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 01:40 +0200, mouss wrote:
mouss wrote:
Is there some way to grab the metadata from IPCountry to count the
number of countries that were involved in sending a mail, and set a
score
pGod dag,strong /strong/pspan /span
a name=#qppp
/abrbr***br
Warning!br
This letter contains a virus which has beenbr
successfully detected and cured.
br***br
The part that's noteworthy is this:
br***br
Warning!br
This letter contains a virus which has beenbr
successfully detected and cured.
On Monday 30 June 2008 6:04 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote:
pGod dag,strong /strong/pspan /span
a name=#qppp
/abrbr***br
Warning!br
This letter contains a virus which has beenbr
successfully detected and cured.
br***br
The part that's noteworthy is this:
br***br
Warning!br
This letter
On Monday 30 June 2008 6:04 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote:
pGod dag,strong /strong/pspan /span
a name=#qppp
/abrbr***br
Warning!br
This letter contains a virus which has beenbr
successfully detected and cured.
br***br
The part that's noteworthy is this:
br***br
Warning!br
This letter
Many of our clients started to have problem sending emails to us after I
inserted more strict
SA rules . Previously our system was flooded with spams. So I decided to
inserted them to the
Existing emails. After this the spams had reduced significantly. But I know
more worry about false
Positive
Hello,
I am new to SA, I have read through some of the faq and wiki, so far
can't find the average spam rate % detected by SA. I know it is not
the same for everyone, but I want to get the feel of general
statistics (If you don't mind to share)
1. How many Spam detection rate if I am using
20 matches
Mail list logo
