On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:46:13AM +0000, Duane Hill wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Arthur Dent wrote: > >> Hello all. >> >> I have just upgraded from SA 3.2.4 to 3.2.5 and ran sa-update to get the >> latest rulesets (which also happens every night via a cronjob). >> >> I got the following errors: > > [errors chopped] > >> Stopping spamd: [ OK ] >> Starting spamd: [ OK ] >> >> The error message doesn't make clear which rule file(s) are triggering the >> error. Below I list the contents of my /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/ >> >> I have no evidence, but I suspect the SARE rules... >> >> Any ideas as to what the problem is and how I can fix it? >> >> >> Thanks in advance... >> > [rules chopped] > > Have you looked at the debug output of: > > spamassassin -D --lint
Well yes I did. But I just took a closer look - I must have missed these the first time round: [20811] dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=-0.812 [20811] dbg: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency 'DCC_CHECK' [20811] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_MKSHRT' [20811] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_GT' [20811] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_RD_SAFE has undefined dependency 'SARE_RD_SAFE_TINY' [20811] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined dependency 'SARE_XMAIL_SUSP2' [20811] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined dependency 'SARE_HEAD_XAUTH_WARN' [20811] dbg: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined dependency 'X_AUTH_WARN_FAKED' [20811] dbg: rules: compiled meta tests Is this the source of the problem? What do I need to do to fix it? I'm a little surprised as this is an out-of-the-box implementation and I thought that after the upgrade, running sa-update would simple download the relevant sare rulesets (which it did) and I would be up and running... Thanks for your help so far. Much appreciated...
pgpPLmIFhcP0c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
