On 09/10/2008 12:16 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:02 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> I replied with more information to Daryl's post but I must
>> have sent it directly to him instead of the list. I
On 09/10/2008 11:57 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:33 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
>>> It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the
>>> wrong users in the same thread.
>>> For e
Thank you for your suggestion!
I listed the content of the user's .spamassassin folder and found some files
that were not on the other user's folders, such as:
bayes_toks.new
bayes.lock
I renamed all the files and have been monitoring the server for over an hour
and the problem has not occurred
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:45:12AM -0700, martinezpt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed a strange behavior on a server I maintain and after 2 days
> trying to figure it out by monitoring the server and searching the web I
> still cannot determine the cause of the problem.
>
> I'm running cPanel wit
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:31:03PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> However, given that other user settings actually do work, this might
> even be isolated to some particular code, rather than a widespread oops.
>
I could be wrong but it seems to only be happening with the whitelist_from_rcvd
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:19 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:16:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > William, please search bugzilla for duplicates first. If you're positive
> > this issue hasn't been reported before, please feel free to file a new
> > bug, adding as
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:16:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> William, please search bugzilla for duplicates first. If you're positive
> this issue hasn't been reported before, please feel free to file a new
> bug, adding as much details as possible. Thanks.
>
I did search and could only
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:02 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > To be a little more helpful and less snippy -- if you want more detailed
> > answers, and check if it might be a different bug than the one
> > mentioned, telling us a
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:53:30PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> To be a little more helpful and less snippy -- if you want more detailed
> answers, and check if it might be a different bug than the one
> mentioned, telling us about your SA version would be a smart first
> move...
>
I wasn'
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:33 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> > It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the
> > wrong users in the same thread.
> > For example usera has "whitelist_from_rcvd *.sonic.net soni
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:33 -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> > It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the
> > wrong users in the same thread.
> > For example usera has "whitelist_from_rcvd *.sonic.net soni
John Hardin wrote:
While shit has happened too many times, I don't see why a browser would
do PTR lookup when given an IP.
If security settings are defined by the server's hostname or domain name
you'd kinda have to, or else say that all numeric-IP URLs are inherently
untrustworthy.
In that
Please help - I don't know what to do about this. Am I
missing something fundamental? Can anyone offer some
insight? Thank you. --mark--
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
S
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:30:11AM -0700, William Taylor wrote:
> It would seem the whitelist_from_rcvd is incorrectly propigating to the wrong
> users in the same thread.
> For example usera has "whitelist_from_rcvd *.sonic.net sonic.net" setup. If
> userb gets sent mail that is
> processed by t
> Yes, I tried running spamassassin -D < /tmp/email.eml
>
> It checks against URIBL if there is a link inside the message body.
> It doesn't seem to check against DNSBL at all.
>
>
> --
> Tomasz Chmielewski
> http://wpkg.org
>
Check these type of things, this is a cut from one of our
/etc/mail
Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
Duane Hill schrieb:
(...)
I run an SMTP server here on my workstation. This is how I have it
set up and works perfect:
clear_trusted_networks
clear_internal_networks
Is your amavisd-new on an external machine to the SMTP server?
I don't use amavisd-new. I was
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Yes, I tried running spamassassin -D < /tmp/email.eml
It checks against URIBL if there is a link inside the message body.
It doesn't seem to check against DNSBL at all.
Can you post a link to your .cf files and the spamd run arguments ?
Regards,
Rick
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on
a machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-n
Duane Hill schrieb:
(...)
I run an SMTP server here on my workstation. This is how I have it
set up and works perfect:
clear_trusted_networks
clear_internal_networks
Is your amavisd-new on an external machine to the SMTP server?
I don't use amavisd-new. I was just talking about SpamAssass
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP a
Duane Hill schrieb:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin
are ru
Ned Slider schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a "filter" server in a private LAN.
Just a quick observation - does the machine on the private
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a "filter" s
Daniel J McDonald schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:32 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a "filter" server in a private LAN.
Just a quick observation - does the machine on the private lan have
Internet a
Hi!
I've noticed a strange behavior on a server I maintain and after 2 days
trying to figure it out by monitoring the server and searching the web I
still cannot determine the cause of the problem.
I'm running cPanel with Exim+Spamassassin.
In the last few days, during some specific periods we n
McDonald, Dan schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a "filter" server in a private LAN.
You need to add the pu
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:07 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
> machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
> running on a "filter" server in a private LAN.
You need to add the public and private IP'
I have a mail setup, where the SMTP server (Postfix) is running on a
machine with a public IP address, and amavisd-new and spamassassin are
running on a "filter" server in a private LAN.
Basically, "mail" server receives mail via SMTP, and the mails are
checked on another machine.
I think Dn
29 matches
Mail list logo
