LuKreme wrote:
On 6-Jan-2009, at 08:51, Greg Troxel wrote:
I realize that HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI has or had a reasonable ruleqa
value. But, I wonder if SA should apply higher standards than that, and
not give negative scores to databases that don't behave reasonably.
This has been brought up
Hi
anyone have a rules for increase the score when the from: are same that
to: ?
Thanks
jerome
Robert Nicholson wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:59:04 -0600:
does anybody recommend this?
for what? It's garbage and remains garbage. ;-) Any non-ASCII characters
in the header have to be Q- or B-encoded (=?Utf-8?B?.?=). If they are
not they will just display as the corresponding ASCII
This is lame, read the archives.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:42 PM
Craig wrote:
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:18 PM
Craig wrote:
Hello All-
I have recently been getting MANY spam slipping through Spamassassin
and I am looking for help on how to stop. I have used Spamassassin
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 07:54 -0600, Craig wrote:
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:42 PM
Craig wrote:
Post 3 similar messages on pastbin so that we can determine a common
factor between them. Use pastbin, not this list to post the message.
Pastbin-I am not familiar with
Phibee Network Operation Center wrote:
Hi
anyone have a rules for increase the score when the from: are same
that to: ?
Yes, there was a thread about this just a few days ago.
See TO: and FROM: line are the same. from 1/4/2008 in the archives.
[I've not yet found in the archives something which addresses this
question; if I missed it I apologise]
I am trying to set up a system whereby I can create lists of
addresses/servers of varying degrees of spamminess. For example, I
might have three lists:
From server
Hello!
In the last few days my Spamassassign does not filter a (for me) new kind of
spam. I have an idea how to fight this spam and want to ask the list if this
is possible with SA.
First a short analysis of what's going on:
1st fact: I get mails like this one:
---
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Florian Lagg wrote:
So - if possible - I want spamassassign to:
1. Request the links in the mail body and check them for http-error 302 or
meta redirects
2. Check the links we got by doing this against some DNSBL's
Is this possible? Is there a
Besides the DDOS issue, there's a privacy issue, which is messy with
DNSBLs already. Nothing SA does should send network traffic to a place
controlled by the mail sender. Checking a DNSBL for which there's some
reason to believe they aren't underhanded is one thing, but fetching
stuff from a
Concerning scoring options defined on “user_prefs”, is there a way to
apply AND logical operation for two or more SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs describing
like “score A B 2.0”? If it is not available now, let me know how to
react as a temporary resolution.
In case that (A || B) sometimes appears on
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:42 PM
Craig wrote:
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:18 PM
Craig wrote:
Hello All-
I have recently been getting MANY spam slipping through Spamassassin
and I am looking for help on how to stop. I have used Spamassassin
rtm for meta rules
:)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:45:18AM -0800, ml wrote:
Concerning scoring options defined on “user_prefs”, is there a way to
apply AND logical operation for two or more SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAMEs describing
like “score A B 2.0”? If it is not available now, let me know how to
Links would help-
http://pastebin.com/d59f95b6d
http://pastebin.com/d17f12f4
http://pastebin.com/m46ce2877
Craig ccanfi...@unitedwayqc.org 1/7/2009 11:46 AM
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:42 PM
Craig wrote:
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:18 PM
Craig
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:44:39PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
Besides the DDOS issue, there's a privacy issue, which is messy with
DNSBLs already. Nothing SA does should send network traffic to a place
controlled by the mail sender. Checking a DNSBL for which there's some
reason to believe
Hi!
Besides the DDOS issue, there's a privacy issue, which is messy with
DNSBLs already. Nothing SA does should send network traffic to a place
controlled by the mail sender. Checking a DNSBL for which there's some
reason to believe they aren't underhanded is one thing, but fetching
stuff
On Wed, January 7, 2009 18:45, ml wrote:
In case that (A || B) sometimes appears on non-spams but (A B)
frequently appears on spams,
meta test (A B)
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Wed, January 7, 2009 19:05, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Besides that, its a perfect way to ack your address to them. If they
make a url like blah.at.blah.com and thats corresponding to your
address, like this or url encoded they know your address is
active, real handy.
it olso works on
From: Theo Van Dinter felic...@apache.org
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:36:18 -0500
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Florian Lagg wrote:
So - if possible - I want spamassassign to:
1. Request the links in the mail body and check them for http-error 302 or
meta
You can look at the WebRedirect plugin on
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins
Possible? Sure.
Should? Not unless you want to turn your (and anyone else
running that code's)
machine into a DDoS client.
In other words, while it's possible to shoot yourself
hi,I need your help
I used a group of CustomRules with big5 charset
but all email I sent will get the spam score from several specific lines of
CustomRules but there is no any words matched in the email.I have used many
emails to test and was sure that the rules is right written.If I change the
Florian Lagg wrote:
In the last few days my Spamassassign does not filter a (for me) new
kind of spam. I have an idea how to fight this spam and want to ask
the list if this is possible with SA.
snip
More examples:
--
Hey! Do you believe that when New Year
Hi,
We have a spamassassin server filtering our companies emails currently.
Each day we recieve an email from the root account of our server overviewing
the previous days spam filtered emails, network status and disk status.
As i was not the one who setup the server, i'm not sure exactly how
AFAIK, that's not part of SpamAssassin, so you'd need to find
whatever is generating that e-mail and change it. I'm sure I'll be
corrected if I'm wrong, but this isn't an option I'm aware of.
At 09:18 PM 1/7/2009, you wrote:
Hi,
We have a spamassassin server filtering our companies emails
-Original Message-
From: Simon.Baker [mailto:simon_ba...@medfin.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:19 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Daily run output
Hi,
We have a spamassassin server filtering our companies emails currently.
Each day we recieve an email from
On 07.01.09 11:46, Craig wrote:
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP
Randy rramsd...@livedatagroup.com 1/6/2009 2:42 PM
Post 3 similar messages on pastbin so that we can determine a common
factor between them. Use pastbin, not this list to post the message.
I have 3
27 matches
Mail list logo
