>
> No. Scoring based on single-words is pretty much the
> opposite of the SA approach. That's all I was saying.
>
karsten,
i get the SA approach
and to the no answer, baloney
this word should get a *HIT* no mattter how small it is scored.
- rh
>
> You must not be looking very hard. It's there, both in the
> default ruleset and in the updated ruleset, but not as a
> single-word rule:
>
> grep -i nigeria
> /var/db/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/*
> jo...@chip:~$ grep -i nigeria
> /var/db/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:56 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> IE had a nasty habit of ignoring the MIME type in HTTP headers and
> rendering HTML even when one wanted it displayed as text/plain. So it
> wouldn't surprise me if Outlook (Express) had the same annoying
> "helpfulness".
>
I've wasted
--On Friday, January 30, 2009 4:41 PM +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
Aren't there any MUAs that try to autodetect the right content type?
Even from microsoft?
IE had a nasty habit of ignoring the MIME type in HTTP headers and
rendering HTML even when one wanted it displayed as text/pla
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 18:28 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, January 23, 2009 17:36, Dennis Hardy wrote:
>
> > Yes already done: http://pastebin.com/m4400a74d
>
> why not get it listed on http://uribl.com/ ?
Benny, this is going to help how?
Dennis clearly stated a *week* ago that the "d
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, January 23, 2009 17:36, Dennis Hardy wrote:
>
>> Yes already done: http://pastebin.com/m4400a74d
>>
> why not get it listed on http://uribl.com/?
>
Both uribl and ivmURI listed this domain back on January 23rd. But it is
unclear exactly *when* this spam
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 13:12 -0500, sa-li...@techsuperpowers.com wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> > maybe its just me, but was there really an issue with out of office
> > messages?
> > (except in this mailing list :-)
> i noticed the same thing when we first st
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:47 -0800, Kelson wrote:
>On the subject of vs