On 02/04/2009 10:01 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
> we should probably remove that warning. it's been stable (at least in the
> sense of the code not changing) for a long time now!
+1 -- I've been using M::SA::Client on my clusters (processing many
millions of messages a day) for more than 4 years with
Mark wrote:
>
> Just noticed this on spam:
>
>
>
> 2.1 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
>
>
>
> I know I can change scores at will, of course,
>
> but a default of 2.1, that seems a mite excessive, no?
>
>
>
> - Mark
>
2.1 is quite low compared to the default required_score
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:48:50 GMT
Mark wrote:
> 2.1 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
>
>
>
> I know I can change scores at will, of course,
>
> but a default of 2.1, that seems a mite excessive, no?
Seems reasonable to me, and it's not as if someone just thought it up.
Just noticed this on spam:
2.1 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
I know I can change scores at will, of course,
but a default of 2.1, that seems a mite excessive, no?
- Mark
On Sun, April 5, 2009 12:41, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what they mean by 'return address'; do they mean
> the From: field?
Return-Path != From
> If so, all the backscatter I'm getting has a From: address
might be the sender, but not always
> so none of it would be considered bo
On 5-Apr-2009, at 06:07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 05.04.09 01:56, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
[...]
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level: .*\(\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
Maildir/10/new
Maildir/10/new is not a maildir, is it?
Maildir/10/ may be a maildir,
--On Saturday, April 04, 2009 9:11 PM +0100 Nix wrote:
I hasten to point out (a little late) that the talk itself was excellent
and hiliarious, but that you need excellent eyes or telepathy to grasp
it all without the slides.
Agreed. The presenter is very entertaining and the poor quality of
> i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
> 10 or more --> directory 10
> 9 --> directory 9
>
> and so one
>
> But - nothing happens - the mails are all in the /Maildir/new directory
Given your last recipe, Maildir/new isn't a directory but an mbox
formatted file. Was that a stra
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 11:20 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > whitelist_bounce_relays your.outgoing.smtp
> >
> > See the VBounce documentation [2] and 20_vbounce.cf on your machine.
> > Simply define all your outgoing SMTP servers to enable the VBounce
> > plugin and re
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 11:12 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > ok_locales en# all Western char sets in general
>
> Maybe this is just the docs being worded badly, but it looks like that
> simply marks en charset mail as being not spam... it doesn't
> automatically
Hmm, not sure why my Spamassassin isn't detecting it as spam then. How
do I set Spamassassin to give me a full spam analysis header even when
the message isn't detected as spam? As you can see it just gives me a
'X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7'.
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
mouss wrote:
Neil Schwartzman a écrit :
> On 05/04/09 7:28 AM, "mouss" wrote:
>
>>> personally, i say spam
>
>> metoo. take a look at their web sites:
>> http://www.rodale.com
>> http://www.prevention.com
>> http://www.menshealth.com
>> http://www.biggestloserclub.com
>> lose what?
>>
>> (on the other hand,
Jeremy Morton a écrit :
> [snip]
> Examples of a couple of the type of bouncebacks I get:
> http://www.game-point.net/misc/bb1.txt
This one is not a "conformant" bounce. but this doesn't matter. it is
detected as spam by SA:
Content analysis details: (10.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
On 05/04/09 7:28 AM, "mouss" wrote:
>> personally, i say spam
> metoo. take a look at their web sites:
> http://www.rodale.com
> http://www.prevention.com
> http://www.menshealth.com
> http://www.biggestloserclub.com
> lose what?
>
> (on the other hand, runningtimes.com and runnersworld.com may
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Morton [mailto:ad...@game-point.net]
Sent: zondag 5 april 2009 13:44
To: mouss+nob...@netoyen.net
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ways to block bouncebacks?
> Examples of a couple of the type of bouncebacks I get:
>
> http://www.game-point.ne
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Morton [mailto:ad...@game-point.net]
Sent: zondag 5 april 2009 12:36
To: SM
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ways to block bouncebacks?
> Unless I'm missing something, this is going to be utterly useless for
> me. Wikipedia says: "E-mail that
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
mouss wrote:
Jeremy Morton a ?crit :
mouss wrote:
the recipient of the bounce is the sender of the original message. so if
you use BATV, you could block bounces sent to a non BATV address.
Again, maybe I'm missing something here, but let's go back to
On 05.04.09 01:56, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
> i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail.
[...]
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Level: .*\(\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
> Maildir/10/new
Maildir/10/new is not a maildir, is it?
Maildir/10/ may be a maildir, if it is, use Maildir/10/, don't add /new
there.
--
> >>1. Is it possible to have a Spamassassin rule that considers subjects
> >>that contain a character glyph not used by the English or French
> >>languages (obviously punctuation, numbers, and some other stuff would
> >>also be allowed) to be spam?
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >ok_locales en
mouss wrote:
Jeremy Morton a écrit :
mouss wrote:
the recipient of the bounce is the sender of the original message. so if
you use BATV, you could block bounces sent to a non BATV address.
Again, maybe I'm missing something here, but let's go back to basics;
how do I identify a 'bounce' messag
Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Morton [mailto:ad...@game-point.net]
Sent: zondag 5 april 2009 11:54
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ways to block bouncebacks?
Again, I ask, what does SRS do to deal with bouncebacks that don't have
the SRS info in the To addre
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Morton [mailto:ad...@game-point.net]
Sent: zondag 5 april 2009 11:54
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ways to block bouncebacks?
> Again, I ask, what does SRS do to deal with bouncebacks that don't have
> the SRS info in the To address? They w
Jeremy Morton a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>> the recipient of the bounce is the sender of the original message. so if
>> you use BATV, you could block bounces sent to a non BATV address.
>
> Again, maybe I'm missing something here, but let's go back to basics;
> how do I identify a 'bounce' message?
RobertH a écrit :
>
>
>>> 0.2 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from
>> dynamic IP
>>> address
>>> [209.92.22.130 listed in
>> dnsbl.sorbs.net]
>>
>> That would be incorrect. The IP is static, not dynamic.
>>
>> whois://209.92.22@whois.arin.net
mouss wrote:
the recipient of the bounce is the sender of the original message. so if
you use BATV, you could block bounces sent to a non BATV address.
Again, maybe I'm missing something here, but let's go back to basics;
how do I identify a 'bounce' message? There seems to be no standard for
Jeremy Morton a écrit :
> Unless I'm missing something, this is going to be utterly useless for
> me. Wikipedia says:
> "E-mail that is being bounced back should have an empty (null) return
> address so that bounces are never created for a bounce and therefore you
> can't get messages bouncing bac
Unless I'm missing something, this is going to be utterly useless for
me. Wikipedia says:
"E-mail that is being bounced back should have an empty (null) return
address so that bounces are never created for a bounce and therefore you
can't get messages bouncing back and forth forever."
I'm not
At 02:59 05-04-2009, Jeremy Morton wrote:
Well, as far as I can tell from that document, SRS is great at
saying, "yep, this is a legit bounce message". But, if SRS says it
doesn't seem to be, aren't you rather back at square 1? A message
that looks like a regular e-mail, doesn't really have a
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
[...]
2. Is there a Spamassassin rule that tries to catch any bounceback
message (unfortunately in any language, I am getting bounceback messages
in most languages known to mankind) to be spam?
whitelist_bounce_relays your.outgoing.smtp
See the VBounce documentation
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
1. Is it possible to have a Spamassassin rule that considers subjects
that contain a character glyph not used by the English or French
languages (obviously punctuation, numbers, and some other stuff would
also be allowed) to be spam?
ok_locales en# all Western cha
Again, I ask, what does SRS do to deal with bouncebacks that don't have
the SRS info in the To address? They would just then appear as regular
e-mail messages, no?
Best regards,
Jeremy Morton (Jez)
Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
Sent: zaterdag
Well, as far as I can tell from that document, SRS is great at saying,
"yep, this is a legit bounce message". But, if SRS says it doesn't seem
to be, aren't you rather back at square 1? A message that looks like a
regular e-mail, doesn't really have any spam characteristics (Viagra,
etc., jus
32 matches
Mail list logo
