> > On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> Blacklisting a large and serious hosting provider is just not serious
> >> and very bad for business.
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=yahoo.com
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=ho
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 09:16 +1000, Res wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> >> This is wrong. if you have evidence, show it. if not, stop spreading
> >> rumours. I have delisted an IP in the past, and I have been watching
> >> people trying to delist a block but without
Hi,
I'm trying to find a solution allowing user filtering attachments. My
environment uses sql user tables.
I was using mimeheader, it works at local.cf but no inside userpref table.
Spamassassin shows the rules at debug, but it doesn't work (with
allow_user_rules 0 or 1).
Do you have any idea h
Steven W. Orr wrote:
Is there a way to shut off all spam filtering that thunderbird might want to
be doing, but at the same time, allow me to click on a message and then click
on the "Junk" button and cause that Junk button to run the sa-learn --spam
command on the message?
That's a nice idea; i
Thanks for the below, René,
I think you mentioned SpamAware earlier but I either forgot or I
couldn't find it; I'll certainly look into what you've suggested.
By the way, you've inspired me to add something I thought about earlier
but didn't write: it seems a viable idea for an individual or g
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
This is wrong. if you have evidence, show it. if not, stop spreading
rumours. I have delisted an IP in the past, and I have been watching
people trying to delist a block but without clues on how to do it...
I have to agree with Mouss here. I'v
Charles Gregory a écrit :
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> somewhat hesitant to use spamcop as our own servers once had a brief
>>> listing with them (and it wasn't due to spam).
>> Got more info?
>
> Sadly, we're dealing with my aging memory. :)
>
> While I cannot remembe
mouss wrote (about the PBL):
> stop spreading FUD. if you know of false positives, show us so that we
> see what you exactly mean.
>
> a lot of people, including $self, use the PBL at smtp time.
As usual, it depends on your definition of “false positive”.
If you mean “IP address that should not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/09 16:15, quoth René Berber:
> Steven W. Orr wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't seem to support. i.e.,
>> I
>> and lots of other people want the ability to pipe a message to a program. I
>> have looked
Steven W. Orr wrote:
[snip]
> What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't seem to support. i.e., I
> and lots of other people want the ability to pipe a message to a program. I
> have looked, lots of people have asked for years, and there seems to be no
> addon to provide that capability
Lee wrote:
[snip]
> I appreciate however those instructions may be aimed at a mindset and
> application at server level rather than desktop, but I assume there are
> others like me who would love SA's excellent spam filtering in a Windows
> desktop email client.
[snip]
The best choice for this (d
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:58:56 +0300
"Jari Fredriksson" wrote:
> I do it so, that a cron-job grabs all mail from my confirmed-spam
> folder on server, and learns it and reports to dcc, razor and
> spamcop. It currently does only the report part, but I think it
> learns it as --spam in the same pro
Jason Haar wrote:
Speaking of image/rtf/word attachment spam; is there any work going on
to standardize this so that the textual output of such attachments could
be fed back into SA?
Just as a note:
I'm currently working on a modular plugin for extracting text and add it
to SA message parts.
serious hosting providers" - I was thinking more of organisations such
as 1and1, hetzner, rackspace etc. etc.
whats the issue with hetzner? I'm a customer so i'd be very interested
in any spam issue not beeing processed by them.
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:00 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
> 2) I didn't include free email providers in my list of "large and
> serious hosting providers" - I was thinking more of organisations such
> as 1and1, hetzner, rackspace etc. etc.
My special award goes to 1and1. I get
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote:
>> Blacklisting a large and serious hosting provider is just not serious
>> and very bad for business.
>
> http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=yahoo.com
> http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.
> Spamasassin and retraining a false negative
>
> What I really want to do is something that TB doesn't
> seem to support. i.e., I and lots of other people want
> the ability to pipe a message to a program. I have
> looked, lots of people have asked for years, and there
> seems to be no addon to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried asking this question on the TB forum, but they're tied up with their
own problems right now. I'd like to try here because I frequently get my
problems solved.
Here is what I posted on the TB help forum.
Spamasassin and retraining a false nega
Thanks for your further replies on this.
It indeed appears what I have now may well currently be the most
convenient approach, all things considered.
To clarify, when I talk about running the SAwin32 program, what I am
actually running on my desktop is SAproxy which is part of the
click-and-i
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
somewhat hesitant to use spamcop as our own servers once had a brief
listing with them (and it wasn't due to spam).
Got more info?
Sadly, we're dealing with my aging memory. :)
While I cannot remember precisely, categorically it was a situati
Jeremy Morton wrote:
... cPanel... or any web-based server config software, for that
matter. They (unsurprisingly) allow you to do a bunch of basic
stuff much more easily, but anything as complex as a DNSBL and
you're back to the command line (sometimes with hacks)...
DNSBLs aren't that complex
On Wed, June 24, 2009 14:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 24.06.09 14:39, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> X-crabtree-dweezil-us-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not
>> cached,
>> score=30.667, required 5, autolearn=spam, AWL -1.67, BAYES_50 0.00,
>> CRM114_PROB_SPAM 0.50, CTYME_
On 24.06.09 14:39, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> X-crabtree-dweezil-us-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
> score=30.667, required 5, autolearn=spam, AWL -1.67, BAYES_50 0.00,
> CRM114_PROB_SPAM 0.50, CTYME_IXHASH 2.50, FH_RELAY_NODNS 1.45,
> GENERIC_IXHASH 2.50, KAM_ST
X-crabtree-dweezil-us-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=30.667, required 5, autolearn=spam, AWL -1.67, BAYES_50 0.00,
CRM114_PROB_SPAM 0.50, CTYME_IXHASH 2.50, FH_RELAY_NODNS 1.45,
GENERIC_IXHASH 2.50, KAM_STOCKGEN 1.50, KARMA_CONNECT_NEGATIVE 2.00,
R
X-Amavis-PenPals: age 0 0:00:53
Received: from localhost.junc.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost.junc.org (localhost.junc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id dBpCCcpNuO0O for ;
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wash1.inkorgen.com (wash1.inkorgen.
On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote:
> Blacklisting a large and serious hosting provider is just not serious
> and very bad for business.
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=yahoo.com
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com
http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/l
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> Some U.K. providers (such as Fasthosts & Rackspace(UK)) never seem to
> get a listing for any of their ranges - which is interesting when you
> consider they are probably the largest providers of hosting in the UK
> and that Spamhaus hosts with one of them.
Blackli
Am 2009-06-22 13:04:49, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
> Well ..
> > body AE_MEDS35: /\(\s?w{2,4}\s(meds|shop)\d{1,4}\s(?:net|com|org)\s?)/
^^ ^^^
Oops, my fault... copied thr wong string...
body AE_MEDS35: /\(\s?w{2,4}\s(?
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
>>> When I did my research for setting up RBL's, I found old comparisons
>>> between RBL's that seemed to indicate that the spamhaus PBL and the
>>> spamcop lists had slightly higher levels of flase postives.
>> stop spreading FUD. if you know of false positives,
> > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=1 n=2 n=3
> > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 1.615 0 0.877 # n=0 n=2
> > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2
> > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 0.001 0 0.353 # n=0 n=2
> > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_
30 matches
Mail list logo
