Jose Luis,
I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8,
reviewing SA logs shows the following message:
warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
in response
It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8
Jose Luis,
> I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8,
> reviewing SA logs shows the following message:
> warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
> in response
> It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8
So what
Dear Sirs,
I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS
4.8, reviewing SA logs shows the following message:
warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response
It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8
What is wrong?
Dear Sirs,
I have
installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS 4.8, reviewing SA
logs shows the following
message:
warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response
It
should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8
What
is wrong
On Wed 02 Jun 2010 09:52:51 PM CEST, Helmut Schneider wrote
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint <
doh :)
- != --
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: T
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Helmut Schneider wrote:
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
What distinguishes 'certain mails'? Length? Content? Mime attachements?
So the body tests take ~ 30 of 37 seconds. It's not a load problem,
I noticed a significant increa
David Michaels wrote:
> Quoting "Helmut Schneider" :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
> > problem:
[...]
> > timing: total 36840 ms - init: 3827 (10.4%), parse: 43 (0.1%),
> > extract_message_metadata: 822 (2.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 178
> >
Quoting "Helmut Schneider" :
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint <
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and
is no longer s
Hi,
with certain mails on FreeBSD 8.0 and SA 3.3.1 I have a performance
problem:
[/var/amavis/tmp]# spamassassin -D -lint <
/var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20100602T192227-44802/email.txt
Jun 2 21:37:08.809 [50826] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and
is no longer supported, ignoring.
Jun 2 21:37
On 6/2/2010 12:01 PM, spamassassinl...@saphirtech.fr wrote:
Hi,
What can I do? Thanks for any suggestions
This is what I do when I get performance issues, and long-running
processes:
Here is another performance hint.
When you first setup your server and it's running right, do the fo
Andy,
> FreeBSD 8.0-p2
> Exim 4.71
> SpamAssassin 3.3.1
> Perl 5.10.1
> All packages have been installed from source via FreeBSD ports.
>
> The problem:
> Two main issues really
> 1) Ever since this server was built (as a replacement for another
> Exim/FreeBSD mail server) I have been seeing in
Hi,
What can I do? Thanks for any suggestions
This is what I do when I get performance issues, and long-running
processes:
1) check for memory issues such as not enough "low" memory using "free -l"
and monitor the machine with top and vmstat for a while to get a general
feeling of wha
It's either Ground Fault Interruptor
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device) commonly used in
kitchens and
bathrooms ;-)
or it's something from this company:
http://www.gfi.com/
Ted
On 6/2/2010 11:38 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Well firstly I have said "for me" so Im not
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:25 +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
>as per the subject Im having severe problems, any help much appreciated.
> My installation:
>
> FreeBSD 8.0-p2
> Exim 4.71
> SpamAssassin 3.3.1
> Perl 5.10.1
>
> All packages have been installed from source via FreeBSD ports.
> 1)
This weekend I just setup a mailserver running:
FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE generic kernel
then cvsupped the current ports and make installed
on our software. I'm having no problems at all.
I'll send you more info off list.
This was a clean install. In other words, I FTP'ed the configs and
mail fil
Well firstly I have said "for me" so Im not trying to trash
Spamassasin (I seem to be in a minority of people with any severe
issues), and secondly I have posted some of the same issues previously
without such a theatrical subject and I received zero replies. No
offence was intended for tho
On 6/2/10 2:25 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
Hi,
as per the subject Im having severe problems, any help much
appreciated.
run GFI on a windows 2007 server and all your troubles will be over.
Next time, try picking a subject line that will immediately piss off
anyone who knows anything spama
Hi,
as per the subject Im having severe problems, any help much appreciated.
My installation:
FreeBSD 8.0-p2
Exim 4.71
SpamAssassin 3.3.1
Perl 5.10.1
All packages have been installed from source via FreeBSD ports.
The problem:
Two main issues really
1) Ever since this server was built (as a
On May 28, 2010 John Hardin wrote:
>> I am having the same issue,
>>
>>In fact, I was going to post the same exact question.
>>
>>We've been having a problem with emails that are completely blank
>> except for an attached .rtf file which is where the spam message is.
>>
>> Is there a way of dec
Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> IIRC, when I sent messages through sa-learn on the old mail server as
> spam, then checking with spamassassin debug, this would show a 3.5
> BAYES score. I will double check this, but I would hope to at least
> add a positive score when training a spam message.
Training a
Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/2/10 11:39 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[09:23] sa-learn { forget,spam,ham} SHOULD change the BAYES
scores correct?
[09:24] We upgraded spamassassin and it just does not work
like it did before.
[09:24] I would normally be able to learn as spam and change
the baye
On 6/2/10 11:39 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
[09:23] sa-learn { forget,spam,ham} SHOULD change the BAYES
scores correct?
[09:24] We upgraded spamassassin and it just does not work
like it did before.
[09:24] I would normally be able to learn as spam and change
the bayes score to a 3.5
[09:25]
[09:23] sa-learn { forget,spam,ham} SHOULD change the BAYES
scores correct?
[09:24] We upgraded spamassassin and it just does not work like
it did before.
[09:24] I would normally be able to learn as spam and change
the bayes score to a 3.5
[09:25] but now i relearn as sapm it the score stay
On 6/2/10 9:42 AM, "Joseph Brennan" wrote:
>
> Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> I've received a virtually unreadable email - about 3Mb worth, containing
>> text, html and a zip file. Nothing unusual about it, except that the
>> Content-Type should have been "multipart/mixed" and specified a
>> boundary
Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
> Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> I've received a virtually unreadable email - about 3Mb worth,
>> containing
>> text, html and a zip file. Nothing unusual about it, except that the
>> Content-Type should have been "multipart/mixed" and specified a
>> boundary - instead it was j
Per Jessen wrote:
I've received a virtually unreadable email - about 3Mb worth, containing
text, html and a zip file. Nothing unusual about it, except that the
Content-Type should have been "multipart/mixed" and specified a
boundary - instead it was just "text/plain", which made the mail a
li
On 6/2/2010 8:45 AM, Gabor Illo wrote:
> Can somebody know how can i disable this RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET?
>
> It's correct?
>
> echo "score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0" >>
> /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
>
assuming that /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ is your site rules dir, yes.
If i
Can somebody know how can i disable this RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET?
It's correct?
echo "score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0" >>
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
28 matches
Mail list logo
