Louis Guillaume-2 wrote:
>
> 2. When outgoing messages are checked, spamd tries to find a
> user to run as using the recipient's address. The way this
> is done is to use the user-portion of the recipient
> address, which is absolutely insane!
>
When using spamc to send a message t
Hi,
Recently I've had a lot of reports of returned mail from authenticated
users. The messages are being bounced on the way out.
I understand that SA checks outbound messages, but I have discovered two
things, one of them rather disturbing:
1. I cannot find a way to simply trust authenticat
On 6/8/2010 11:22 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> We also very loudly repeatedly state on the list that if you want to
>> keep abreast of the latest spam, you need to be running the latest
>> version of the codebase (can't take advantage of new features without
>> it!), but don't have that clearly
Hi,
> We also very loudly repeatedly state on the list that if you want to
> keep abreast of the latest spam, you need to be running the latest
> version of the codebase (can't take advantage of new features without
> it!), but don't have that clearly documented either.
It would be great if you
Hi,
I have a server that's frequently pretty busy during the day, and just
started to notice these messages periodically:
Jun 8 13:35:39 mail01 amavis[28784]: (28784-272) SA TIMED OUT,
backtrace: at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/IO/Select.pm line
104\n\tIO::Select::can_read('IO::Select=ARRAY(0
On 6/8/2010 5:48 PM, James Ralston wrote:
> On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
>
>> 3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates
>> *exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time.
>>
>> 3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent updates. IFF
>> t
On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> 3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates
> *exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time.
>
> 3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent updates. IFF
> the mass-check corpus is large enough.
And exactly whe
On 8.6.2010 22:56, Scott Ostrander wrote:
>
> On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> -Original Message-
>> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
>>
>> But then no.
>>
>> It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work.
>>
>> Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: ext
On 8.6.2010 22:47, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-Original Message-
> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
>
> But then no.
>
> It gets BAYES_99 now, but then I think it still does not work.
>
> Jun 8 22:38:00.931 [21328] dbg: extracttext: External call: unrtf
"/usr/bin/unrtf","-t",
On 8.6.2010 22:23, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM
>>> Subject: Re: word file spam
>>>
>>> But SA -D --lint says
>>>
>>> Jun 8 20:38:57.000
On 8.6.2010 21:58, Scott Ostrander wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: word file spam
>>
>> But SA -D --lint says
>>
>> Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
> depend
> -Original Message-
> From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:ja...@iki.fi]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: word file spam
>
> But SA -D --lint says
>
> Jun 8 20:38:57.000 [10237] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
dependency in eval while running with -T switch at
/etc/
On 13.10.2009 12:13, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
>
>> There were mutterings about a generic plugin that would take an
>> attachment, process it somehow (e.g. wvHtml, antiword, ps2ascii, or
>> whatever was appropriate), and insert the results into the body text
>> to be scanned by th
Hi all,
I am using spamassassin with Exim.
I have a router in the middle of the Exim configuration as such:
spamcheck_router:
driver = accept
no_verify
condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq {$received_protocol}\
{spam-scanned}}} {1}{0}}"
transport = spamcheck
When the ma
Hi all,
I am using spamassassin with Exim.
I have a router in the middle of the Exim configuration as such:
spamcheck_router:
driver = accept
no_verify
condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq {$received_protocol}\
{spam-scanned}}} {1}{0}}"
transport = spamcheck
When the ma
Hi all,
I am using spamassassin with Exim.
I have a router in the middle of the Exim configuration as such:
spamcheck_router:
driver = accept
no_verify
condition = "${if and { {!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} {!eq {$received_protocol}\
{spam-scanned}}} {1}{0}}"
transport = spamcheck
When the ma
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
aquero wrote:
>
> Hi,
>i have setup spam-assassin and enabled Bayesian filter. Do i have
> to install the db required for Bayesian filter? or, is there any
> central database for spam-assassin Bayesian filter which it will
> automatically access?
A f
> We are using the CommuniGate Pro mail server, which allows Outlook user
> to submit messages using the Microsoft's MAPI protocol to submit
> messages across the IMAP port. The problem that we are having is that
> although the messages are submitted directly from an authenticated
> client connecti
aquero wrote:
>
> Hi,
>i have setup spam-assassin and enabled Bayesian filter. Do i have to
> install the db required for Bayesian filter? or, is there any central
> database for spam-assassin Bayesian filter which it will automatically
> access?
>
SpamAssassin uses Berkeley DB, an embedd
19 matches
Mail list logo
