sidewide learning need further informations

Hi, i use spamassassin with sidewide setup. i want to know, if i can ONLY learn spam w/o learning ham. I dont want to get bad results. Problem is, that i get a lot of mails every day and cant have a look at all. so i only want to train spamassassin with the mails my users want to get rid off.

Re: some weight for 12-letter 2nd level labels

[ 3rd attempt to send this message; without it being rejected by apache.org for being spam... ] I picked two of those domains at random: [r...@vm2 tmp]# host -t TXT trigasplumet.net.fresh.spameatingmonkey.net trigasplumet.net.fresh.spameatingmonkey.net descriptive text Domain first seen

More info about the rules

Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook, below are the results. How can I fix these two checks -probably at my mail server- FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 HELO_NO_DOMAIN Thanks. pts rule name description -- -- 1.8

Re: sidewide learning need further informations

On 9/1/2010 5:59 AM, escp wrote: Hi, i use spamassassin with sidewide setup. i want to know, if i can ONLY learn spam w/o learning ham. I dont want to get bad results. Problem is, that i get a lot of mails every day and cant have a look at all. so i only want to train spamassassin with

Re: More info about the rules

On 9/1/2010 8:42 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote: Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook, below are the results. How can I fix these two checks -probably at my mail server- FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 HELO_NO_DOMAIN Thanks. pts rule name description --

Re: More info about the rules

On 9/1/2010 8:42 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote: Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook, below are the results. How can I fix these two checks -probably at my mail server- FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 HELO_NO_DOMAIN Thanks. pts rule name description --

Re: More info about the rules

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 15:42 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote: Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook, below are the results. How can I fix these two checks -probably at my mail server- Don't fix the tests. Fix the external host. ;) FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 HELO_NO_DOMAIN The external host handing

Re: More info about the rules

Yes it's my very own MailEnable mail server, SA integrated. I sent the message from home. 2010/9/1 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de If that was an SMTP server, fix that. It should, however, not be part of *your* infrastructure, since it's external. If it is under your control, you

Re: More info about the rules

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:13 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote: Yes it's my very own MailEnable mail server, SA integrated. I sent the message from home. Hrm, I'm not sure if that answers the question. Maybe I'm just still too low on caffeine. So, did you just say your MUA's outgoing SMTP is the same as

Re: More info about the rules

Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44 MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44 SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box- My own server SA scores my own test message because of FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 and HELO_NO_DOMAIN checks. I don't know what are these. How can I fix it?

Re: More info about the rules

On 01.09.10 18:27, Emin Akbulut wrote: Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44 MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44 SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box- My own server SA scores my own test message because of FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 and HELO_NO_DOMAIN checks. I

Re: More info about the rules

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 18:27 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote: Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44 MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44 So you are directly submitting to your MX, it seems. SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box- How does that box get the message? My own

Re: More info about the rules

On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote: Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44 MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44 SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box- My own server SA scores my own test message because of FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 and HELO_NO_DOMAIN checks. I don't

Spamassassin not checking user provided RBLs

I'm running spamassassin version 3.3.1-1 from the Debian package. I added several RBLs to /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre but spamassassin only queries its built in RBLs and not the ones I added. An example RBL entry to init.pre is shown below: header IN_NJABL_ORG

Lot of .info spam lately

Anyone else seeing an increase in .info spam?

Re: sidewide learning need further informations

escp wrote: Hi, i use spamassassin with sidewide setup. i want to know, if i can ONLY learn spam w/o learning ham. I dont want to get bad results. Problem is, that i get a lot of mails every day and cant have a look at all. so i only want to train spamassassin with the mails my users want to

Re: Lot of .info spam lately

-- Original Message -- From: Marc Perkel supp...@junkemailfilter.com Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:32:40 -0700 Anyone else seeing an increase in .info spam? yeah, tons of it. rejects for last preceding 10 days: bzegrep -ic postfix.*reject:.*\.info

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Good. My test mail headers rejected here: : P Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: users@spamassassin.apache.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the

Re: FreeMail plugin updated

Hello, Would you please remove Runbox.com from that list as we have not been a free email provider since 2001. Kim -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeMail-plugin-updated-tp23468766p29599495.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spamassassin not checking user provided RBLs

On ons 01 sep 2010 22:47:36 CEST, Chris Datfung wrote header IN_NJABL_ORGrbleval:check_rbl('njabl','dnsbl.njabl.org.') describe IN_NJABL_ORG Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org tflags IN_NJABL_ORGnet score IN_NJABL_ORG 5 first errpr is you added it to a pre file, next is