Hello everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange issue everytime the crondaily runs the
spamassassin script for updating.
the error returned to me by cron daily is the following:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin exited with return code 25
I've tried to search on this list archive and also
Hi, I would put an mail address in my black list and then I have modified
local.cf:
blacklist from t...@hotmail.it
..but in log file I have still:
Nov 15 18:30:38 mail amavis[6974]: (06974-10) Checking: [82.51.y.x]
t...@hotmail.it - tt...@domain.it
Nov 15 18:30:40 mail amavis[6974]:
On 16.11.10 11:01, Sasa wrote:
Hi, I would put an mail address in my black list and then I have modified
local.cf:
blacklist from t...@hotmail.it
..but in log file I have still:
Nov 15 18:30:38 mail amavis[6974]: (06974-10) Checking: [82.51.y.x]
t...@hotmail.it - tt...@domain.it
Nov
Hi,
Is there anyway to see the changes made by sa-udpate when I execute it?
I want to see which rules and scores are modified since the last update.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Alvaro Marín Illera
Hostalia Internet
www.hostalia.com
On 2010-11-16 11:41, Alvaro Marin wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to see the changes made by sa-udpate when I execute it?
I want to see which rules and scores are modified since the last update.
Thanks!
Regards,
sa-update -D
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:08:20 +0100
Francesco Acchiappati francesco.acchiapp...@secoges.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange issue everytime the crondaily runs the
spamassassin script for updating.
the error returned to me by cron daily is the following:
run-parts:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:43:57 -0500
Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca wrote:
I noticed recently that the average ~0.8s scan time on our filter
cluster had jumped to just over 3s.
We noticed a huge jump in scan times on several of our customers' systems.
Try disabling the Day-old Bread rules. We
On tir 16 nov 2010 09:08:20 CET, Francesco Acchiappati wrote
the error returned to me by cron daily is the following:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin exited with return code 25
try doing what writed in that cron from shell and add -D to args
sa-update -D
what are being in shell here
On tir 16 nov 2010 11:01:39 CET, Sasa wrote
Hi, I would put an mail address in my black list and then I have
modified local.cf:
blacklist from t...@hotmail.it
blacklist_from not blacklist from
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On tir 16 nov 2010 12:48:48 CET, RW wrote
I don't think that cron.daily/spamassassin is part of SA - it's
probably specific to your OS or distribution. Perhaps you could post it.
or delete it to get rid of the problem :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Il 16/11/2010 12:48, RW ha scritto:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:08:20 +0100
Francesco Acchiappatifrancesco.acchiapp...@secoges.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange issue everytime the crondaily runs the
spamassassin script for updating.
the error returned to me by cron daily
On 11/16/2010 6:05 AM, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-11-16 11:41, Alvaro Marin wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to see the changes made by sa-udpate when I execute it?
I want to see which rules and scores are modified since the last update.
Thanks!
Regards,
sa-update -D
sa-update -v
will
On 11/15/2010 10:25 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:07:43 -1000
Alexandre Chapellonalexandre.chapel...@mana.pf wrote:
I use it just the same for the domains I have complete controm over.
Unfortunately, be aware that this setup maybe forbid your legitimate
emails to be
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:54 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled ]; then
this dir does imho not exists, its /var/lib/spamassassin/version/compiled
Nope, the path is correct. See man sa-compile for yourself.
--updatedir=path Directory to place updates
(default:
Hello,
Just wanted to create (or use if they already exist) some rules:
1. Email body contains more than 10 newliners without any text between them
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
3. Email body contains only a line of text and a line with some URL
Any help appreciated.
Regards,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
Il 16/11/2010 15:11, John Hardin ha scritto:
I'd suggest the most likely problem is sa-compile is failing for some
reason. Try running it interactively.
You could run this:
bash -x /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin 21 | tee /tmp/log.txt
As
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
Spammer can and do use SPF so it's not a good white list either.
That was never its intent.
If SPF is correct and the domain is in my white list then I'll pass it as
white.
_that_ is its intent.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Il 16/11/2010 17:27, John Hardin ha scritto:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
Il 16/11/2010 15:11, John Hardin ha scritto:
I'd suggest the most likely problem is sa-compile is failing for some
reason. Try running it interactively.
You could run this:
bash -x
Hi guys
This is the first time I have used this software so sorry if it's a stupid
question but SpamAssassin is giving us differing results on the same email
when they are run on different websites.
Classic ASP Site
VERSION: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08)
SCORE: 5.2
Spam Tests:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:51 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
This is the first time I have used this software so sorry if it's a stupid
question but SpamAssassin is giving us differing results on the same email
when they are run on different websites.
Some of this is quite confusing.
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
Hello,
I've seen all but (2) in ham, so be careful with these rules - you
probably want to score them at 0.01 and use them in meta-rules.
Just wanted to create (or use if they already exist) some rules:
1. Email body contains more than 10
Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
John Hardin ha scritto:
You also might want to run sa-compile manually and see what happens.
/bin/sh: cc: command not found
make: *** [body_0.o] Error 127
command failed: exit 2
heh... i think this may be the reason.. sa-compile returns this
error.. now i
John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Kris Deugau wrote:
I noticed recently that the average ~0.8s scan time on our filter
cluster had jumped to just over 3s.
If you can duplicate this behavior on a manual scan of a test message,
there are debug flags and a timing plugin that will help
On 11/16/10 4:31 PM, Liam R. MacInnes wrote:
Hi All
I've been looking around and racking my brains to find a rule to key on a pattern we've
noticed. A lot of the recent spam that's making it through seems to be sent from domains
registered in the previous 48 hours with valid SPF records. I'm
On 11/16/2010 4:34 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
there was/is a 'DOB' blacklist (day old bread). but I think the dns
servers may be overloaded. some people are complaining about timeouts.
I think this was revived at the following web site (probably by a
different person?):
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists#Familiar_Domains
These *might* work. I mangled together a couple types of tests:
header __RCVD_IN_FAMILIAReval:check_rbl_envfrom('familiar',
'hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com.')
describe __RCVD_IN_FAMILIAR Received from
Le mardi 16 novembre 2010 à 07:48 -0800, Marc Perkel a écrit :
On 11/15/2010 10:25 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:07:43 -1000
Alexandre Chapellonalexandre.chapel...@mana.pf wrote:
I use it just the same for the domains I have complete controm over.
Unfortunately,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
I've never seen mail with so short a body - where's the spam payload?
Likely the Subject line.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I'd be curious to hear how that goes. And what would happen if they were
run through the weekly network mass checks.
I don't think you'd ever see good results in the mass checks. The
masscheck corpora retain spam for an extended period
On 11/16, John Hardin wrote:
I don't think you'd ever see good results in the mass checks. The
masscheck corpora retain spam for an extended period (several
months) and DoB-style rules would only hit for a few days after the
spam run initially sent the message.
Are you telling me the mass
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:20 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 16:02 +, Mike Bro wrote:
2. Email body contains less than 4 characters
I've never seen mail with so short a body - where's the spam payload?
Likely the
On 11/16, John Hardin wrote:
How so? If masscheck only considered the rules that hit when the
message was first received (or more properly, was first added to the
corpora), how would you ever test new rules against the existing
corpora?
They don't just use emails since the last mass check?
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:27:55PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 11/16, John Hardin wrote:
I don't think you'd ever see good results in the mass checks. The
masscheck corpora retain spam for an extended period (several
months) and DoB-style
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:44:41PM -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/Spam_DNS_Lists#Familiar_Domains
These *might* work. I mangled together a couple types of tests:
header __RCVD_IN_FAMILIAReval:check_rbl_envfrom('familiar',
On tir 16 nov 2010 16:48:28 CET, Marc Perkel wrote
Other than that - it just plain doesn't work.
spammers can do what thay like, but add sender domain to spf whitelist
here is not there bussiness
do you belive its spammers rule the world ?
example of a invalid spf
On tir 16 nov 2010 17:00:50 CET, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
Nope, the path is correct. See man sa-compile for yourself.
--updatedir=path Directory to place updates
(default: /var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/perlversion/version)
yep i lost it here, compiled is in that dir even on gentoo,
On tir 16 nov 2010 17:51:21 CET, Francesco Acchiappati wrote
heh... i think this may be the reason.. sa-compile returns this
error.. now i have to figure out how a dependency like cc is missing
on my system... mmm this will be a loong night..
thank you very much to everyone who helped
Benny Pedersen wrote:
gcc is not default installed in debian
bug it as a missing dependice for spamassassin
It is only a Recommends: relationship because it isn't required. It
is only required if you use the compiled rules. And that is optional.
So gcc isn't required but only optional.
Bob
38 matches
Mail list logo
