On Fri, May 13, 2011 17:09, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:58 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
Not quite - Google's retry may come from another server in a different
range.
if it did then mail from Google would be delayed significantly, like
12-24 hours for example.
Yes, exactly, this is
On 15.05.11 18:50, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2011-05-15 18:08:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
You are late!
so far, every RFC defining SMTP yet released. They all (821, 2821, 5321) say
at least 100 must be accepted.
...and what if your Mailserver can not handel the threatment
Is there a way to write a header test on the mime-decoded contents of
Subject: ?
AFAICT, a test such as :
header __BLURP Subject =~ /[^\s]{60}/
works on the mime-encoded Subject, not the decoded version?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59 -0600, Scott sst...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Sendmail and SQL prefs with SA. The problem I am having is
that Sendmail seems to only send the username to SA when filtering so
our aliases only use the default settings.
What glue are you using to have Sendmail call
I'd say that manual training of spam and ham in such group is needed
in such cases.
manuel training is sign of to much whitelistning with default score of
-100, most ham here does not even need it, so bayes is here is more passive
on this here, and this makes more sure that ham that is ham is
I'd say that manual training of spam and ham in such group is needed
in such cases.
On 16.05.11 14:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:
manuel training is sign of to much whitelistning with default score of
-100, most ham here does not even need it, so bayes is here is more passive
on this here, and
Sunday, May 15, 2011, 5:49:39 PM, you wrote:
MUf The original claim was done Ted Mittelstaedt.
On 15.05.11 18:34, Niamh Holding wrote:
Indeed, and it is that blanket claim I an refuting.
too late then. I think we agree that Yahoo has problems with 4xx although
not in all cases. And I think
Hello Matus,
Monday, May 16, 2011, 3:28:04 PM, you wrote:
MUf well, are you an yahoo employee?
ROFL
A bit of playing with whois might reveal a bit :)
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpNtyfzvCXfn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Matt!
Thanks for the hints...
I currently use spamass-milter which seems to send the email address
to SA but excludes the domain. For example on a email like
sa...@domain.com it seems to check the DB using sales. This generally
wouldn't be a problem on a small corp server however I have
Ideally if spamass-milter could pass the entire email address to SA I
could deal with this in my control panel.
I haven't used spamass-milter at all so take this with a grain of salt,
but the following from the man page seems hopeful for your environment:
Thanks again!
I updated my /etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter config with the following:
EXTRA_FLAGS=-r 20 -u defaultuser -e defaultdomain
I also set the SQL query in SA's local.cf back to the default and it
now filtered by email address instead of just the username.
Scott.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at
Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
Am 2011-05-16 10:51:26, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Nobody requires you to execute 100 spamassassin processes and nobody
It happen automaticaly if...
requires to run them them in parallel. However, the RFCs DOES require you
accepting at least 100 recipients
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:19:26 +0200
Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Nobody requires you to execute 100 spamassassin processes and nobody
It happen automaticaly if...
...the system accept 100 messages at once for 100 different
recipients. Sending to 100 recipients is
http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/rpm/3.3.2-rc1/
I made test packages for EL5 and EL6. I began using both in production
just now with no apparent ill effects. We need more people to test this
and provide feedback.
Warren
On 05/14/2011 10:34 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
Hey folks,
This is
14 matches
Mail list logo
