On 12.07.2011 10:39 CE(S)T, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> There is the other thread about some patching for IPv6, but could someone
> post
> the current status with this problem or some idea what should be done for now
> better than just not loading Botnet?
I think botnet works well with those IPv6 p
On 2011-07-13 23:35, Jezz wrote:
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1df659.2070...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-13 20:23, Jezz wrote:
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1c820d.3000...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-12 15:21, Jezz wrote:
So even commenting out those lines doesn't help, as the plugin still
requi
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1df659.2070...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-13 20:23, Jezz wrote:
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1c820d.3000...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-12 15:21, Jezz wrote:
So even commenting out those lines doesn't help, as the plugin still
requires the Syslog module which I don
On 2011-07-13 20:23, Jezz wrote:
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1c820d.3000...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-12 15:21, Jezz wrote:
So my question is this: is there any way I can get the DecodeShortURLs
plugin working without the Syslog module requirement? Eg. can I get this
plugin to only view Syslo
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
All I can think of at this point is permissions issues somehow.
The FuzzyOcr/Misc.pm might be masking the real exit code. It evals a bunch
of Perl code in the child process and then:
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1c820d.3000...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-12 15:21, Jezz wrote:
So my question is this: is there any way I can get the DecodeShortURLs
plugin working without the Syslog module requirement? Eg. can I get this
plugin to only view Syslog as an optional and not mandatory
wrote in message
news:20110712164439.gc20...@chaosreigns.com...
On 07/12, Jezz wrote:
So my question is this: is there any way I can get the
DecodeShortURLs plugin working without the Syslog module
requirement? Eg. can I get this plugin to only view Syslog as an
optional and not mandatory prere
"Axb" wrote in message
news:4e1c820d.3000...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-12 15:21, Jezz wrote:
So my question is this: is there any way I can get the DecodeShortURLs
plugin working without the Syslog module requirement? Eg. can I get this
plugin to only view Syslog as an optional and not mandatory
On 2011-07-13 18:44, Jason Ede wrote:
Can I get SA to be a bit more verbose about what it considers to be trusted
networks?
-Original Message-
From: dar...@chaosreigns.com [mailto:dar...@chaosreigns.com]
Sent: 13 July 2011 17:32
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Skipping
Can I get SA to be a bit more verbose about what it considers to be trusted
networks?
> -Original Message-
> From: dar...@chaosreigns.com [mailto:dar...@chaosreigns.com]
> Sent: 13 July 2011 17:32
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Skipping header lines
>
> On 07/13, Ja
> -Original Message-
> From: Axb [mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 July 2011 16:27
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Skipping header lines
>
> On 2011-07-13 17:06, Jason Ede wrote:
> > I'm running 3.3.2 and I'd like to ignore the first received header as I
> > rec
On 07/13, Jason Ede wrote:
>I’m running 3.3.2 and I’d like to ignore the first received header as I
>receive the email on one postfix instance and then pass it along to
Oh, another possibility is that the first postfix instance is, for some
reason, inserting a header that SA is failing to
On 07/13, Jason Ede wrote:
>I’m running 3.3.2 and I’d like to ignore the first received header as I
>receive the email on one postfix instance and then pass it along to
>another to do the scanning. So far all the emails are showing up as
>trusted as it sees the email as coming from
On 2011-07-13 17:06, Jason Ede wrote:
I'm running 3.3.2 and I'd like to ignore the first received header as I receive
the email on one postfix instance and then pass it along to another to do the
scanning. So far all the emails are showing up as trusted as it sees the email
as coming from 127.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> All I can think of at this point is permissions issues somehow.
The FuzzyOcr/Misc.pm might be masking the real exit code. It evals a bunch
of Perl code in the child process and then:
# couldn't open file descriptors or exe
I'm running 3.3.2 and I'd like to ignore the first received header as I receive
the email on one postfix instance and then pass it along to another to do the
scanning. So far all the emails are showing up as trusted as it sees the email
as coming from 127.0.0.1
I'm guessing this is simple, but
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
I took a quick look at the sources for jpegtopnm and could not see
anything that would return an error code of 2048. What OS is this on?
FuzzyOCR is returning $? as the "retcode", which is
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> I took a quick look at the sources for jpegtopnm and could not see
> anything that would return an error code of 2048. What OS is this on?
FuzzyOCR is returning $? as the "retcode", which is not the exit code.
It's the exit _status_,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
Mail through mail server does does not recognise the spam image and
generates an error.
Through manual test works fine.
That strongly suggests something in the environment of mail delivery is
different than during manual testing.
The most likely problem i
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:29 +0200, J4K wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 02:43 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 14:06 +0200, J4K wrote:
> >
> > I assume you tested it as well as running it through lint ("spamassassin
> > >
> > Comments: As written the rule won't work because __PR2 assumes
On 07/13/2011 02:43 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 14:06 +0200, J4K wrote:
>
> I assume you tested it as well as running it through lint ("spamassassin
>
> Comments: As written the rule won't work because __PR2 assumes that the
> domain name starts at the beginning of the URI b
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 14:06 +0200, J4K wrote:
> I put this in to deter the wealth of job advertisments we get:
>
> describe PRIVATE_RULE1 English language job opportunity
> body __PR1/(Employment opportunity|Job offer match, respond
> to apply|Employment you've been searching|Job
On 07/13/2011 01:23 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 09:44 +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
>> recently we had two specific types of spam getting very low score
>> (about 3) and going through -
>>
>> a) one was about Armbanduhren (wrist watches in German) or
>> Edelarmbanduhren (luxury wri
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, polloxx wrote:
>
>>> Okay, no error with the test message.
>>>
>>> So far we haven't been able to reproduce the error.
>>>
>>> Is it still occurring in the live mail stream?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Ok.
>
>>> Was this test message me
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 09:44 +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
> recently we had two specific types of spam getting very low score
> (about 3) and going through -
>
> a) one was about Armbanduhren (wrist watches in German) or
> Edelarmbanduhren (luxury wrist watches) - all in that direction.
>
> b) the othe
Ok, now my local.cf looking as follow:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit
rewrite_header Subject [* SPAM _SCORE_ *]
required_score 5.0
report_safe 0
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn1
skip_rbl_checks 0
use_r
Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 3:14:53 AM, Kristian wrote:
> Is it nessacary needed? When i start spamd in debug mode saw the
> /usr/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf is proceeded.
You shouldn't make any changes in the /usr/share/spamassassin
directory as they could be overwritten when you upgrad
Is it nessacary needed? When i start spamd in debug mode saw the
/usr/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf is proceeded.
> Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 1:23:51 AM, Kristian wrote:
>
>> Hello im using spamassassin and user prefs in mysql database, i have
>> successfully setting up mysql table and al
Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 1:23:51 AM, Kristian wrote:
> Hello im using spamassassin and user prefs in mysql database, i have
> successfully setting up mysql table and all about correct work of
> squirelmail plugin and from client site everything is ok. The problem is
> spamassassin can't handle us
hello,
recently we had two specific types of spam getting very low score (about 3) and
going through -
a) one was about Armbanduhren (wrist watches in German) or Edelarmbanduhren
(luxury wrist watches) - all in that direction.
b) the other was about all kind of Job offers
as i could not figur
30 matches
Mail list logo
