On 05/02/2013 08:22 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
hello
I'm spammed with numerous google account that are forging header
the first line begin allways with the following ( replace www with
various characters )
Return-Path:
Please could you help to instruct spamassassin to drop this ?
Thanks a lot !
hello
I'm spammed with numerous google account that are forging header
the first line begin allways with the following ( replace www with
various characters )
Return-Path:
Please could you help to instruct spamassassin to drop this ?
Thanks a lot !
Hey there, thanks for responding. That's an interesting point.
Are you saying I should not use autolearning at all?
I don't have any way to review a large corpus of messages because we don't
have access to them - after they run through our servers they are sent on,
and the text of the message is
On Wed, 01 May 2013 22:02:43 +0100
Steve Freegard wrote:
> On 01/05/13 19:40, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> > Hi, Seve -
> >
> > Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons?
> >
>
> Performance is one of the things that bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1
> will give you. It means that if th
On 05/01/2013 03:15 PM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 03:02 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/1/2013 8:17 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse
Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam
On 01/05/13 19:40, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hi, Seve -
Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons?
Performance is one of the things that bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1 will
give you. It means that if the message was already considered spam by
Bayes, then the message won't be a
On 5/1/2013 12:12 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 01.05.2013 08:17, schrieb Marc Perkel:
Looking for tricks.
I'm working on improving outbound spam filtering and I'm using Exim and
testing for valid recipients doing forward recipient callouts, which I
would like to reduce.
I'm wondering if th
Hi, Seve -
Thanks for your response. Is that just for performance reasons?
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Freegard [mailto:steve.freeg...@fsl.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 2:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bayes Autolearning
>
> All good advice ther
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:34:48 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam
>
> On 05/01/2013 04:28 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > I don't care what some folks are saying about .pw, compared to Nominet they
> > totally rock
Thank you for that!
Off-list you mentioned that you don't need to set the cron/expire because of
Redis features; why is it commented out here?
> -Original Message-
> From: Axb [mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 2:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> S
All good advice there from Axb; the only thing I'd add to that is:
bayes_auto_learn_on_error 1
Which prevents Bayes from over-training when the classifier already
agrees with what the autolearn is trying to train on.
Cheers,
Steve.
On 01/05/13 19:14, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andre
On 05/01/2013 08:01 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Any suggestions any of you have for a Bayes newbie - about what I just asked
or otherwise - would be very much appreciated.
I advocate autolearning as it has always worked fine for me.
Can take a bit longer to see good results but with some tuning
Hey All -
I'm about to set up Bayes on one of our mail servers. A lot of the
documentation says that I need to manually sift through a few hundred
messages and classify them to 'teach' the filter, and it sounds like I may
need to do that on an ongoing basis.
That is not a very plausible so
On 05/01/2013 05:25 PM, John Levine wrote:
Nominet is a registrar
No, Nominet is THE .co.uk registry
R's,
John
thanks for the correction.
Still - fixing after abuse is putting us back 10 years.
> Kindly report all the complaints at abuse.al...@registry.pw and CC to
> abuse.al...@directi.com.
Hmmn. Is there some reason you don't take abuse reports at
ab...@registry.pw and at cont...@registry.pw, which is the only address on
the web site?
Remember, everyone who sends you an abuse repor
>Nominet is a registrar
No, Nominet is THE .co.uk registry
R's,
John
>Directi is acting as THE .pw registry
On 05/01/2013 04:28 PM, hospice admin wrote:
I don't care what some folks are saying about .pw, compared to Nominet they
totally rock.
When was the last time anyone saw Nominet suspend a .UK spammer?
Judy
You miss the point.
Nominet is a registrar
Directi is acting as THE .pw registry
Registr
I don't care what some folks are saying about .pw, compared to Nominet they
totally rock.
When was the last time anyone saw Nominet suspend a .UK spammer?
Judy
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 06:58:41 -0700
> From: dones...@directi.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: .pw / Palau URL do
On 5/1/2013 9:58 AM, doneshlaher wrote:
Dear Kevin A. McGrail,
Thank you very much for reporting the domain names. We have suspended all
the reported 13 domain names.
And that's good to hear and I applaud you for reaching out to the
mailing list about this issue. And as a consumer, I like che
On 05/01/2013 04:06 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello Axb,
Thank you for providing with the domain names. We will be suspending all
these reported domain names.
However, in the mean time may i know what kind of spams have been received
??
snowshoe / pillz / you name it
also can you please forwar
Hello Axb,
Thank you for providing with the domain names. We will be suspending all
these reported domain names.
However, in the mean time may i know what kind of spams have been received
?? also can you please forward us the email headers of few of the reported
domain names.
This would help u
Dear Kevin A. McGrail,
Thank you very much for reporting the domain names. We have suspended all
the reported 13 domain names.
Regards
Donesh Laher
Cyber Security Analyst
.PW Registry
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/pw-Palau-URL-domains-in-spam-tp10
Hello Axb,
The whois information can be fetched from multiple public whois websites.
Below are the whois websites from where whois can be fetched.
www.registry.pw/whois
www.drwhois.com
www.who.is
www.port43.com
and many more. However, if any particular whois website is not fetching the
whois inf
On 05/01/2013 03:11 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I recommend not blaming them for having a low priced product that
spammers are abusing. Seems to me a bit like blaming the victim.
To me, it sounds like they are trying to get a handle on the outbreak
and better than many other registrars out th
On 05/01/2013 03:02 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/1/2013 8:17 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse
Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names
On 5/1/2013 7:41 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse
Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names
and have
already started taking actions agains
On 5/1/2013 8:17 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse
Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names
and have
already started taking actions agains
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names and have
already started taking actions against the abusive domain names that have
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names and have
already started taking actions against the abusive domain names that have
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names and have
already started taking actions against the abusive domain names that have
been reported to us.
We request you all to
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:17:42 -0700
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Or - open to any suggestions on blocking outbound spam. (I'm
> filtering outbound for customers so I don't control the original
> servers)
We use quarantining (although at a higher score than for inbound mail)
and rate-limiting (a given sen
Am 01.05.2013 08:17, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> Looking for tricks.
>
> I'm working on improving outbound spam filtering and I'm using Exim and
> testing for valid recipients doing forward recipient callouts, which I
> would like to reduce.
>
> I'm wondering if there's any tricks to figure out at lea
32 matches
Mail list logo
