Re: sa-update NOT updating.

2014-05-27 Thread John Goubeaux
Thanks guys, Yes, I was aware that an exit code of "1" IS normal when No New updates are available, But I assumed that the fact that this was going on for so long might indicate another problem was occurring. Apparently the sought.rules.yerp.org channel is also not being regularly updat

Re: sa-update NOT updating.

2014-05-27 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:22 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > We are not currently publishing updates. I will try and get another > push done on that box today. > > On 5/27/2014 2:09 PM, John Goubeaux wrote: > > Can anyone shed some light on what might be happening -or not > > happening - with

RE: SPF checking

2014-05-27 Thread Kevin Miller
We're using the smf-spf milter which allows whitelisting. ...Kevin -- Kevin Miller Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept. 155 South Seward Street Juneau, Alaska 99801 Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500 Registered Linux User No: 307357 -Original Message- From: Fredrik Lindgren

Re: sa-update NOT updating.

2014-05-27 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
We are not currently publishing updates. I will try and get another push done on that box today. On 5/27/2014 2:09 PM, John Goubeaux wrote: Can anyone shed some light on what might be happening -or not happening - with sa-update and my install, I am continually getting an "exiting with cod

sa-update NOT updating.

2014-05-27 Thread John Goubeaux
Can anyone shed some light on what might be happening -or not happening - with sa-update and my install, I am continually getting an "exiting with code 1" when sa-update is run. Full -D output pasted at the very bottom. /usr/local/bin> ./spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 runn

Re: Enom strikes back?

2014-05-27 Thread Axb
On 05/27/2014 01:30 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 12:24 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 26.05.2014 22:42, schrieb James B. Byrne: Regardless of Enom's purported size, what does this say about the registrar's ethics and the domains it hosts? Should such companies and their

Re: Enom strikes back?

2014-05-27 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 12:24 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 26.05.2014 22:42, schrieb James B. Byrne: > > Regardless of Enom's purported size, what does this say about the > > registrar's > > ethics and the domains it hosts? Should such companies and their clients be > > boycotted and thereb

Re: Enom strikes back?

2014-05-27 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 26.05.2014 22:42, schrieb James B. Byrne: > Regardless of Enom's purported size, what does this say about the registrar's > ethics and the domains it hosts? Should such companies and their clients be > boycotted and thereby coerced into dealing with these frauds? what procedure a registrar sho

Re: Enom strikes back?

2014-05-27 Thread Matthias Leisi
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > Regardless of Enom's purported size, what does this say about the registrar's > ethics and the domains it hosts? Should such companies and their clients be > boycotted and thereby coerced into dealing with these frauds? Even though Enom