On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 23:05 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
An automated method would prevent a number of problems, and since the
allowed TLDs are evolving, I think it makes the most sense. I can't
speak to a specific implementation, but -something- automated...
Same here: I pick up new SA versions
On 09/09/2014 10:27 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 23:05 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
An automated method would prevent a number of problems, and since the
allowed TLDs are evolving, I think it makes the most sense. I can't
speak to a specific implementation, but -something-
Am 09.09.2014 um 03:45 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
This incidence is part of the initial round of IANA accepting generic
TLDs. There's hundreds in this wave, and some are abused early. This is
moonshine registration, nothing like new TLDs being accepted in the
coming years.
Or is it? Will
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 10:41 +0200, Axb wrote:
On 09/09/2014 10:27 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 23:05 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
An automated method would prevent a number of problems, and since the
allowed TLDs are evolving, I think it makes the most sense. I can't
speak
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 at 11:04:04 (EU time), Martin Gregorie wrote:
I use Fedora, which is roughly equivalent to Debian unstable, i.e. fairly
cutting edge as its the next step back toward stability from 'testing'.
Hm, that's not quite the right way round - testing is the step in between
W dniu 29.08.2014 o 23:36, Dave Warren pisze:
On 2014-08-29 02:38, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
So what should I do in your opinion? I'm getting spam to my private
spamtrap so I can't fill fields about company - it doesn't matter where
I'm hired for reporting spam. What if I would be unemployed?
On 09/09/2014 11:39 AM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 29.08.2014 o 23:36, Dave Warren pisze:
On 2014-08-29 02:38, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
So what should I do in your opinion? I'm getting spam to my private
spamtrap so I can't fill fields about company - it doesn't matter where
I'm hired for
Hi again,
I noticed FP on mentioned rule when checking ham email. Due to
confidential content I don't want to share it on ML. Is somebody willing
to improve mentioned rule or one case is not enough to look at it? If
somebody would like to look insight it I can send such email offlist.
Regrds
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hi again,
I noticed FP on mentioned rule when checking ham email. Due to
confidential content I don't want to share it on ML. Is somebody willing
to improve mentioned rule or one case is not enough to look at it? If
somebody would like to look insight
Hi,
Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
bad indentation format of quoting.
It doesn't seem possible with gmail directly any longer, so I've set up
thunderbird for this. Maybe it is, but not after clicking around in the obvious
places.
It's possible. A
Hi,
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't really matter from a user perspective, though, right? I
mean, if there are tokens that have already been learned are learned
again, the net result is zero.
Very much not zero.
On 09/09/2014 03:50 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't really matter from a user perspective, though, right? I
mean, if there are tokens that have already been learned are learned
again, the
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 11:10 +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 at 11:04:04 (EU time), Martin Gregorie wrote:
I use Fedora, which is roughly equivalent to Debian unstable, i.e. fairly
cutting edge as its the next step back toward stability from 'testing'.
Hm, that's
The T_SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO rule was recently added I think, and it
looks identical to FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO. A mistake, or is there a
reason for both? - Mark
Hi Marcin,
I'm affiliated with Mailspike and just want to say that we have
changed the contact form so you now have a option specify that you are
contacting as Self-employed or private.
We have also configured ab...@mailspike.org if you need to contact directly.
Regarding your original problem,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
W dniu 09.09.2014 o 15:19, John Hardin pisze:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hi again,
I noticed FP on mentioned rule when checking ham email. Due to
confidential content I don't want to share it on ML. Is somebody willing
to improve
I am helping a friend who is getting hit with a lot of spam. He is
running SpamAssassin. While looking at the spam that he is receiving
I am seeing a pattern in the headers. Along with the normal headers
the messages also contain a random set of random headers. Here are
just the pattern
17 matches
Mail list logo
