Hello
Seems like since the last rules update DNS rules aren't being checked
given that 209.85.216.51 is listed in list.dnswl.org the relevant rule
should show-
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;51.216.85.209.list.dnswl.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
51.216.85.209.list.dnswl.org. 28800 IN A
On 11/11/2014 12:20 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello
Seems like since the last rules update DNS rules aren't being checked
given that 209.85.216.51 is listed in list.dnswl.org the relevant rule
should show-
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;51.216.85.209.list.dnswl.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:20:59 AM, I wrote:
NH Seems like since the last rules update DNS rules aren't being checked
Last update-
Nov 10 04:23:02.028 [3867] dbg: dns: 0.4.3.sought.rules.yerp.org =
3402014020421, parsed as 3402014020421
Nov 10 04:23:02.333 [3867] dbg: dns:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:26:50 AM, you wrote:
A cat msg.eml | spamassassin -D dns
RBL rules hit... but they aren't showing under normal checks.
cat /tmp/0001.eml | spamassassin -D dns
Nov 11 11:44:11.031 [26084] warn: config: created user preferences file:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:59:05 AM, you wrote:
NH RBL rules hit... but they aren't showing under normal checks.
That message of mine has-
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
mail
* domains are different
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 11:26:50 AM, you wrote:
A what do you see
maillog shows
Nov 11 12:15:16 nitrogen spamd[26862]: spamd: connection from 127.0.0.1
[127.0.0.1]:46489 to port 783, fd 5
Nov 11 12:15:16 nitrogen spamd[26862]: spamd: setuid to spamtest succeeded
Nov 11
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 12:20:31 PM, you wrote:
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 414.
$sock = $io_socket_module_name-new(%args);
And a quick test script suggests that
$io_socket_module_name = IO::Socket::INET6
--
Best regards,
Niamh
After a couple of iterations and re-reading the policy syntax in a
DMARC draft, I ended up with the following set of rules ( based on
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7099 ):
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AskDNS
askdns __DMARC_POLICY_NONE _dmarc._AUTHORDOMAIN_
Niamh Holding wrote:
spamd[26862]: spamd: connection from 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:46489 to
port 783, fd 5
spamd[26862]: spamd: setuid to spamtest succeeded
spamd[26862]: spamd: processing message
2014121508.3321875.277...@sailthru.com for spamtest:1028
spamd[26862]: plugin: eval failed:
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 1:55:42 PM, you wrote:
MM Start spamd with option -D dns and compare its dns debuging
So what's the command instead of service spamassassin start?
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpc5cY9k_gpO.pgp
On 11/11/2014 03:01 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 1:55:42 PM, you wrote:
MM Start spamd with option -D dns and compare its dns debuging
So what's the command instead of service spamassassin start?
You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:11:39 PM, you wrote:
A You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to the spamassassin
A init script
So
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd $SPAMDOPTIONS -r $SPAMD_PID
becomes
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd -D dns $SPAMDOPTIONS -r $SPAMD_PID
or do I set
On 11/11/2014 03:26 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:11:39 PM, you wrote:
A You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to the spamassassin
A init script
So
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd $SPAMDOPTIONS -r $SPAMD_PID
becomes
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd -D dns
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A should do the trick...
service spamassassin start logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29407]: Can't locate Crypt/OpenSSL/Bignum.pm in
@INC (@INC contains:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
A should do the trick...
And a message logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29407]: Can't locate Crypt/OpenSSL/Bignum.pm in
Bignum.pm
Am 11.11.2014 um 15:48 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
A should do the trick...
And a message logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41
On 11/11/2014 9:48 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:29:19 PM, you wrote:
A SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -D dns
A should do the trick...
And a message logs-
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen spamd[29405]: logger: removing stderr method
Nov 11 14:42:41 nitrogen
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:51:14 PM, you wrote:
KAM These two sound like you are missing Perl modules for SA. Not sure if
KAM they are relevant but they definitely irk me. Are you installing from
KAM source or from a package?
From source, but 3.4.0 was working fine until
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 15:11 +0100, Axb wrote:
You need to add -D dns (without the quotes) option to the spamassassin
init script
(depending on your distro it may be /etc/init.d/spamassassin)
On current Fedora Linux systems /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin contains a
single line:
SPAMDOPTIONS=-c
Hello Martin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:10 PM, you wrote:
MG In Fedora 18 SA is managed this way, so editing
MG /etc/sysconfig/spamassasin is the best way to do it for Linuxes that
MG use sysVinit daemon management.
Cheers, probably the same for CentOS
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Martin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:10 PM, you wrote:
MG Start by seeing if your setup has a copy of /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin.
OK startup now logs -
Nov 11 15:06:25 nitrogen spamd[29594]: spamd: server killed by SIGTERM,
shutting down
Nov 11 15:06:28 nitrogen spamd[29849]:
On 11/11/2014 9:59 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:51:14 PM, you wrote:
KAM These two sound like you are missing Perl modules for SA. Not sure if
KAM they are relevant but they definitely irk me. Are you installing from
KAM source or from a package?
From
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:12 PM, you wrote:
KAM I would start with
KAM cpan Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA and see if you don't find a bunch of module
dependencies.
Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA is up to date.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
On 11/11/2014 10:40 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:03:12 PM, you wrote:
KAM I would start with
KAM cpan Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA and see if you don't find a bunch of module
dependencies.
Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA is up to date.
Did that fix the BigNum and RSA
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:08:49 PM, you wrote:
NH OK startup now logs -
And a message check logs-
Nov 11 15:41:42 nitrogen spamd[29852]: spamd: connection from 127.0.0.1
[127.0.0.1]:59387 to port 783, fd 5
Nov 11 15:41:42 nitrogen spamd[29852]: spamd: setuid to spamtest
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 3:46:51 PM, you wrote:
KAM Did that fix the BigNum and RSA error you logged?
No
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpesAE2KAyQJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 2:51:14 PM, you wrote:
KAM These two sound like you are missing Perl modules for SA. Not sure if
KAM they are relevant but they definitely irk me. Are you installing from
KAM source or from a package?
On 11.11.14 14:59, Niamh Holding wrote:
From source, but 3.4.0
Hello Matus,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:02:33 PM, you wrote:
MUf what exactly do you install from source: perl or SA?
SA on 30 Oct 2014
MUf ...What did you do yesterday?
23 4 * * * sa-update -D --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
--channel updates.spamassassin.org
Is your IO::Socket::IP at version 0.21 or older?
$ perl -le 'use IO::Socket::IP; print IO::Socket::IP-VERSION'
0.21 CHANGES:
* Ensure that IO::Socket-new( Domain = ... ) definitely returns a
socket in the right family
Mark
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:19:28 PM, you wrote:
MM perl -le 'use IO::Socket::IP; print IO::Socket::IP-VERSION'
Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
Am 11.11.2014 um 17:24 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:19:28 PM, you wrote:
MM perl -le 'use IO::Socket::IP; print IO::Socket::IP-VERSION'
Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
BEGIN
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:02:33 PM, you wrote:
MUf what exactly do you install from source: perl or SA?
On 11.11.14 16:10, Niamh Holding wrote:
SA on 30 Oct 2014
MUf ...What did you do yesterday?
23 4 * * * sa-update -D --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org --channel
Hello Matus,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:47:10 PM, you wrote:
MUf ... as it was already said: do NOT mix manually installed CPAN modules with
MUf packages of any kind. use either one or the other.
so don't use yum and cpan?
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Niamh Holding wrote:
MUf ... as it was already said: do NOT mix manually installed CPAN
modules with
MUf packages of any kind. use either one or the other.
so don't use yum and cpan?
Well, you probably can - if you are careful.
But using an 8 years old version of perl you'd be safer with
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:24:23 PM, you wrote:
NH Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
OK, looks like it's using
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm
But
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:12 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:24:23 PM, you wrote:
NH Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
OK, looks like it's using
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:27:05 PM, you wrote:
RH not install software on random locations
RH * especially not in the root's homedir
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
RH BTW: what is the Re: ***UNCHECKED(Encrypted)*** in
On 11/11/2014 07:12 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Niamh,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 4:24:23 PM, you wrote:
NH Socket version 1.97 required--this is only version 1.78 at
NH /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 30.
OK, looks like it's using
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:33 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:27:05 PM, you wrote:
RH not install software on random locations
RH * especially not in the root's homedir
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
*you*
--On November 11, 2014 at 7:38:08 PM +0100 Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
*you* wrote
OK, looks like it's using
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Socket.pm
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:43 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On November 11, 2014 at 7:38:08 PM +0100 Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
What do you think I specifically installed in arandom location and in
root's homedir?
*you* wrote
OK, looks like it's using
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:38:08 PM, you wrote:
RH *you* wrote
And you made an accusation...
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpGURXZr8Iud.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am 11.11.2014 um 19:49 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:38:08 PM, you wrote:
RH *you* wrote
And you made an accusation...
you mis-use the word accusation
i just read the infos you offer and bring them in a context - in fact
until now nobody knows where
Reindl Harald wrote:
BTW: what is the Re: ***UNCHECKED(Encrypted)*** in your subjects?\
Sorry, my fault. Forgot to remove this from a Subject when replying.
It was added here because the posting includes a PGP signature
and the file(1) utility cannot distinguish a PGP/GPG encrypted
message
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.4
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp9XHgbBFk2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:46:37 PM, you wrote:
RH so mentioning /root/.cpan/build/ make sno sense at all
find / -name Socket.pm
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp51oScErvzv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Reindl,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:55:22 PM, you wrote:
RH nobody knows where you expect Socket.pm loaded from base
so where tells me which is loaded?
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpXUw5neK_Ve.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 11/11/2014 08:06 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
cat /etc/*release
CentOS release 5.4
here's an idea:
remove the
/root/.cpan/ dir...
Update your ancient Centos version
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
This yum update might be connected to the problem...
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpARfMki3D5J.pgp
Description: PGP
On 11/11/2014 08:25 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 6:37:05 PM, you wrote:
A Did I miss this? Do we know what OS version are you using?
This yum update might be connected to the problem...
Which means? Did you run an update or not?
Pls be specific to
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:29:57 PM, you wrote:
A Which means? Did you run an update or not?
Fail to paste error!
Nov 09 13:15:19 Updated: 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgplxkltbXGIG.pgp
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:20:36 PM, you wrote:
A Update your ancient Centos version to Centos 5.11
That's scary... given the server is in a data centre 250 miles away!
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpzrFhHwg7hr.pgp
On 11/11/2014 08:41 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:20:36 PM, you wrote:
A Update your ancient Centos version to Centos 5.11
That's scary... given the server is in a data centre 250 miles away!
real men hug their teddy before doing yum update and patching
Am 11.11.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:20:36 PM, you wrote:
A Update your ancient Centos version to Centos 5.11
That's scary... given the server is in a data centre 250 miles away!
you should subscribe to the CentOS list
it's multiple times explained
Am 11.11.2014 um 20:41 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:29:57 PM, you wrote:
A Which means? Did you run an update or not?
Fail to paste error!
Nov 09 13:15:19 Updated: 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64
besides my previous mail about how to handle CenTOS:
it is *very*
Hi,
Hopefully someone can answer this simply with a link to the right documentation.
I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four numbers
actually are. e.g.
score AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS10 3.995 1.010 3.995 1.010
I feel so dumb as I can't find the documentation
Am 11.11.2014 um 23:41 schrieb Tom Robinson:
Hopefully someone can answer this simply with a link to the right documentation.
I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four numbers
actually are. e.g.
score AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS10 3.995 1.010 3.995 1.010
I feel so
On 11/11/2014 11:41 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
Hi,
Hopefully someone can answer this simply with a link to the right documentation.
I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four numbers
actually are. e.g.
score AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS10 3.995 1.010 3.995 1.010
I feel so
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom Robinson wrote:
I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four numbers
actually are. e.g.
score AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS10 3.995 1.010 3.995 1.010
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
User Preferences -
On 12/11/14 09:45, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 23:41 schrieb Tom Robinson:
Hopefully someone can answer this simply with a link to the right
documentation.
I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four
numbers actually are. e.g.
score
On November 11, 2014 8:48:53 PM Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
yum update -y reboot
good luck send us a postcard...
emerge @world echo cpan not needed in gentoo :)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:30:28 -0500 (EST)
Derek Diget wrote:
We have a department that has subscribed to a service in the cloud
product that is sending email to us via our MX record. The problem
is that they appear to be using shared servers/IPs and thus every
once in a while mail will
62 matches
Mail list logo