First, apologies in advance, I know this list is for seasoned users. I'm a
consumer—not an administrator by any means—but posting here in hopes that
the SA focus of the list will provide a clear answer.
I'm on a shared web hosting plan and receiving an inordinate amount of very
obvious spam. SA
grhoderick skrev den 2015-03-30 16:12:
Example of the difference in output:
http://pastebin.com/ph6wZw2R
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
funny that zen.spamhaus.org still works
Thanks very much for your help!
ask your server admins to solve this dns problem,
Here is what I'm using to do the same globally based on each users mail,
but it could be tweaked to do per user.This happens to be a family
only server, so I'm generally doing the spam/ham review for each user as
needed:
root@omega:/usr/local/bin# more sa-learn-systemwide
#!/bin/sh
#
#
David Jones wrote:
The invaluement RBL is not expensive either and it is awesome. We pay
thousands per year for
a Spamhaus feed because of our volume and mailboxes. The invaluement RBL is
only hundreds
per year and it's almost as good as Spamhaus Zen.
Seconded; this is exactly what
On 3/30/2015 11:49 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Seconded; this is exactly what we've been finding. Invaluement is a
great complement to Spamhaus for a fraction of the cost.
I wouldn't put it as a front-line reject DNSBL, because some of the
things that have been listed are not what I would class,
On 3/30/2015 1:19 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
The cases I
can recall are more along the lines of grey-hat ESPs who pick up a
spammer client for a while,
Kris,
The next time you run across this and think it might be causing a little
too much collateral damage (in spite of the spamming), let me
Am 30.03.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Jude DaShiell:
One of them is that spammers forge your address so much you get your
account blacklisted and end up having to have it shut down. That
happened to me and the jdash...@shellworld.net account. Anyone doing a
google search on shellworld.net
One of them is that spammers forge your address so much you get your
account blacklisted and end up having to have it shut down. That happened
to me and the jdash...@shellworld.net account. Anyone doing a google
search on shellworld.net blacklisted will find my former shellworld.net
address
Rob McEwen wrote:
On 3/30/2015 11:49 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Seconded; this is exactly what we've been finding. Invaluement is a
great complement to Spamhaus for a fraction of the cost.
I wouldn't put it as a front-line reject DNSBL, because some of the
things that have been listed are not
Am 30.03.2015 um 21:26 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 20:07 +0100, RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
Jude DaShiell wrote:
One of them is that spammers forge your address so much you get your
account blacklisted and end up having to have it shut down. That
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:47:10 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but i doubt that exchange don't know it's valid rcpt's and always
backscatters with no way to disable that behavior - even in case of
microsoft i doubt
Google specifically for Exchange 2013. AFAIK, it's
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
Jude DaShiell wrote:
One of them is that spammers forge your address so much you get your
account blacklisted and end up having to have it shut down. That
happened to me and the jdash...@shellworld.net account.
AFAIK there is no blacklist that lists
Am 30.03.2015 um 21:07 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
Jude DaShiell wrote:
One of them is that spammers forge your address so much you get your
account blacklisted and end up having to have it shut down. That
happened to me and the jdash...@shellworld.net account.
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:34:02 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
one reason are the genius MS Exchange setips with a spamfilter in
front, set the spamfilter IP to completly trusted and by
incompetence in that moment also disable the address verification
from the spamfilter
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:07:56 +0100
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
AFAIK there is no blacklist that lists individual sender email
addresses.
There's this one:
https://code.google.com/p/anti-phishing-email-reply/
but its contributors are usually quite competent and won't list a
Am 30.03.2015 um 21:42 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:34:02 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
one reason are the genius MS Exchange setips with a spamfilter in
front, set the spamfilter IP to completly trusted and by
incompetence in that moment also disable
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 20:07 +0100, RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
Jude DaShiell wrote:
One of them is that spammers forge your address so much you get your
account blacklisted and end up having to have it shut down. That
happened to me and the
Am 30.03.2015 um 21:52 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 21:47:10 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but i doubt that exchange don't know it's valid rcpt's and always
backscatters with no way to disable that behavior - even in case of
microsoft i doubt
Google
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:41:21 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, than you can't use recent MS Exchange as a MX and have to place
a MTA in front which get it's user list via database, LDAP or
whatever and is able to reject invalid RCPTs
Indeed.
Office 365 does not grant
On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca wrote:
Seconded; this is exactly what we've been finding. Invaluement is a
great complement to Spamhaus for a fraction of the cost.
Definitely something to add to my nice to have list for the future. Sadly,
as I mentioned earlier,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, grhoderick wrote:
After months of back and forth with the web host, their recommendation has
been to add rules and do more intensive SA learning. But the way I
understand it, no amount of tweaking symbolic test scores or adding rules
can make up for not running the tests to
21 matches
Mail list logo
