Re: phishing rules

2015-08-25 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 24-08-15 18:34, Joseph Brennan wrote: Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com wrote: example the displayed version in mail might be www.example.com, but the actual URI when you highlight or click on it, is foobar.example.net The most common case is that the text shows the real web

Re: phishing rules

2015-08-25 Thread RW
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:55:57 +0200 Tom Hendrikx wrote: Basically every MUA I know will label the message as a possible scam when you use the BAD version, which why you actually never see it in non-spam mail, unless the editor was a real noob. That applies to spam too. Would this really

Re: phishing rules

2015-08-25 Thread Joe Quinn
On 8/25/2015 7:51 AM, RW wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:55:57 +0200 Tom Hendrikx wrote: Basically every MUA I know will label the message as a possible scam when you use the BAD version, which why you actually never see it in non-spam mail, unless the editor was a real noob. That applies to