On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
thx, that explains the issue.
I setup a dns server outside the amazon server.
Now, i can finally do the lookup:
root@aws:~# host -tTXT 2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com
2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com descriptive text "permanent testpoint"
X-Spam-Flag: YES
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:46:18 -0500
j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
> Further testing shows that both smazon and my public ips are blocked.
> I never used my public ip for dns so why is it blocked?
> Is it just my bad luck and the ip is just blocked on URBL?
The rdns for these two addresses is
thx, that explains the issue.
I setup a dns server outside the amazon server.
Now, i can finally do the lookup:
root@aws:~# host -tTXT 2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com
2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com descriptive text "permanent testpoint"
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0
On 30.10.2015 19:53, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
I did configure local recursive server and set both spam local.cf and
resolved.conf to point to 127.0.0.1 and I still get the blocks.
The file name for that is /etc/resolv.conf
NOT resolved.conf
Also if you update local.cf and you run
On 27.10.2015 23.02, Martin Gregorie wrote:
- The server's /etc/resolve.conf should contain the lines
search example.lan
nameserver 192.168.7.2
/etc/resolv.conf
Typo fixed.
--
jarif.bit
> On Thursday 29 October 2015 at 18:29:27, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> I use procmail
>>
>> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
>> * < 256000
>> | spamassassin
>>
>> I run
>> sudo spamassassin -t -d --mbox /home/user/mail/INBOX.spamtest
>>
>> sudo spamassassin --mbox /home/user/mail/INBOX.spamtest
>>
>>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Hardin skrev den 2015-10-30 00:32:
If you really do trust that they will never send you any spam, then
modify your glue config to bypass SA entirely for messages from that
MTA. Why waste the effort scanning those messages?
to learn ham its
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
I already cleaned the db to make sure I dont have it broken.
Would it be better to turn off the autolearn.
Teach sa ham and spam from over 200 messages and then turn back the
autolearn?
How big is
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
> I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
> command:
> sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/username/mail/foldername
>
YES - if Bayes never gets trained on ham, how do you expect it to
recognise the difference between
Am 29.10.2015 um 01:06 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
If you don't understand how to install and configure a DNS server and
prefer printed material to online documents, get the O'Reilly book "DNS
and BIND"
no need for use bind at all for cahcing nameservers, unbound is much
faster for *that* task
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>
>> I already cleaned the db to make sure I dont have it broken.
>> Would it be better to turn off the autolearn.
>> Teach sa ham and spam from over 200 messages and then turn back the
>> autolearn?
>
> How big is your userbase and ham email volume?
Am 30.10.2015 um 18:01 schrieb David B Funk:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.10.2015 um 01:06 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
If you don't understand how to install and configure a DNS server and
prefer printed material to online documents, get the O'Reilly book "DNS
and BIND"
no
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.10.2015 um 01:06 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
If you don't understand how to install and configure a DNS server and
prefer printed material to online documents, get the O'Reilly book "DNS
and BIND"
no need for use bind at all for cahcing
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
>> command:
>> sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/username/mail/foldername
>>
> YES - if Bayes never gets trained on ham, how do you expect it to
> recognise the difference
If auto learn is enabled and header shows:
autolearn=ham
what happens when i classify that email later as spam?
thx
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
>> I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
>> command:
>> sa-learn --ham --mbox
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
I dont use any ham training.Should I scan all my folders with this
command:
sa-learn --ham --mbox /home/username/mail/foldername
YES - if Bayes never gets trained on ham, how do you expect
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
If auto learn is enabled and header shows:
autolearn=ham
what happens when i classify that email later as spam?
Essentially, the tokens from that message in the bayes database will be
converted from "hammy" to "spammy". This is normal
I already cleaned the db to make sure I dont have it broken.
Would it be better to turn off the autolearn.
Teach sa ham and spam from over 200 messages and then turn back the
autolearn?
thx
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:19 -0500, j...@lexoncom.com
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, j...@lexoncom.com wrote:
I already cleaned the db to make sure I dont have it broken.
Would it be better to turn off the autolearn.
Teach sa ham and spam from over 200 messages and then turn back the
autolearn?
How big is your userbase and ham email volume?
If both are
Further testing shows that both smazon and my public ips are blocked.
I never used my public ip for dns so why is it blocked?
Is it just my bad luck and the ip is just blocked on URBL?
root@aws:/home/user#
root@aws:/home/user# host -tTXT 2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com
2.0.0.127.multi.uribl.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
