Chip M.:
*** Does anyone have a contact at LinkedIn ops? ***
I informed LinkedIn and was asked to send the following response on
behalf of Franck Martin:
This email was not sent by Linkedin.
Linkedin uses several lists to ensure the redirection does not end up to a
known bad site. In
Spotted a new exploited forwarder of some sort at LinkedIn -
full spample:
http://puffin.net/software/spam/samples/0041_linked_forward.txt
Except for the munged "To" and "From" email addresses, that's the
pristine network image.
It came From a known friend at "swbell", who normally sends t
On Tue, 17 May 2016 21:42:15 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> discuss that with the pople of SOBRS
Aren't we just a ray of fucking sunshine?
Luckily, I have http://search.cpan.org/~dskoll/Mail-ThreadKiller/
to help me out.
Regards,
Dianne.
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
On Tue, 17 May 2016 18:50:29 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
NOBODY is talking about BACKLIST short TTL
it's all about de-listing when you got blacklisted for good reasons
IMO, the TTL is a completely irrelevant factor when considering
whether or no
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for
reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?)
and you
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.s
On Tue, 17 May 2016 18:50:29 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> NOBODY is talking about BACKLIST short TTL
> >> it's all about de-listing when you got blacklisted for good reasons
> > IMO, the TTL is a completely irrelevant factor when considering
> > whether or not to blacklist an IP. I do not be
Am 17.05.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
On Tue, 17 May 2016 17:14:37 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
NOBODY is talking about BACKLIST short TTL
it's all about de-listing when you got blacklisted for good reasons
IMO, the TTL is a completely irrelevant factor when considering whether
or not
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting?
Theoretically
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E7
On 16 May 2016, at 10:24, jdebert wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2016 12:25:10 +0100
Dominic Benson wrote:
Accepting that not all ISPs are as helpful as they might be, I can't
easily think of a legitimate reason for needing the TTL on the PTR of
a mail server to be small, so if a blacklist operator f
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
On Tue, 17 May 2016 17:14:37 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> NOBODY is talking about BACKLIST short TTL
> it's all about de-listing when you got blacklisted for good reasons
IMO, the TTL is a completely irrelevant factor when considering whether
or not to blacklist an IP. I do not believe there's
Am 16.05.2016 um 16:24 schrieb jdebert:
On Mon, 16 May 2016 12:25:10 +0100
Dominic Benson wrote:
Accepting that not all ISPs are as helpful as they might be, I can't
easily think of a legitimate reason for needing the TTL on the PTR of
a mail server to be small, so if a blacklist operator f
On Mon, 16 May 2016 12:25:10 +0100
Dominic Benson wrote:
>> Accepting that not all ISPs are as helpful as they might be, I can't
> easily think of a legitimate reason for needing the TTL on the PTR of
> a mail server to be small, so if a blacklist operator finds it an
> effective way to manage re
On Mon, 16 May 2016 21:28:40 -0400
Alex wrote:
> I've seen a significant number of FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 also hitting a
> lot of ham, and just wanted to make sure, with such a high score, it
> was also not FP prone...
Is that recently? Before February there was a bug that caused most of
what should
Am 17.05.2016 um 03:28 schrieb Alex:
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:15 AM, RW wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2016 20:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2016, Alex wrote:
Is that score really warranted? For example:
Received: from host82.torus.pl (91.209.116.82) (HELO [192.168.20.
16 matches
Mail list logo