On 23/12/16 17:02, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's
back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different
bayes results if I test a message on the co
On 23/12/16 17:18, Paul Stead wrote:
On 23/12/2016, 13:35, "Sebastian Arcus" wrote:
As soon as I manually delete the SA headers and report in the .eml file,
and pass the message again through spamc, I get identical Bayes scores
to the ones when the message passes initially through Exi
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:18:50 +
Paul Stead wrote:
> Spamassassin ignores certain headers -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm
> - note here that within $IGNORED_HDRS we have -
>
> ---8<---
> |X-Spam(?:-(?:Status|Level|Flag|Report|Hits|S
On 23/12/2016, 13:35, "Sebastian Arcus" wrote:
As soon as I manually delete the SA headers and report in the .eml file,
and pass the message again through spamc, I get identical Bayes scores
to the ones when the message passes initially through Exim -> SA.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/a
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>> I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's
>> back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different
>> bayes results if I test a message on the command line, compared to it
>> going
On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's
back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different
bayes results if I test a message on the command line, compared to it
going through exim -> spamassassin.
>
>
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:12:54 +
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On the command line it is hitting BAYES_99 and BAYES_999 - while
> through Exim it doesn't.
...
> What could possibly account for the large discrepancy in bayes
> results?
If you're running spamd as the spamd user with a global databas
I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's
back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different
bayes results if I test a message on the command line, compared to it
going through exim -> spamassassin.
The header of the message received in the Inb