Hi Guys!
This thread was only just brought to our attention, and the thread is now
several levels deep and a bit old, so if you can help me out with letting me
know what the outstanding issues are, I'd really appreciate it.
As best as I can tell from reading through the thread online, there a
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 14:44 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> Thank you - that is an interesting idea. Do you use a software to
> extract the emails from the Sent archives, or do you add them to the
> database on-the-fly, when the sent emails go out through your MTA?
> If you have any links or exam
RE: potential new SA feature: Direct DNS Querying Per DNSBL Zone
A couple of months ago, I commissioned the development of a potential
new feature in SA. The code is mostly already written, but has at least
one significant bug. Therefore, it is currently in the SA Bugzilla – Bug
7477
https:/
On 15/11/17 09:56, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2017 um 09:41 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I can't really train the bayesian filter on these emails, as it would
start to affect ham emails classification
this is a unproven claim!
we have here phishings in bayes which are classified with BAYES_9
On 15/11/17 09:55, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:41 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
The emails often contain links to various popular cloud platforms -
such as SharePoint, DropBox etc. Most of the emails come from clean
domains, or from large webmail providers.
I'd say there i
On 11/15/2017 8:27 AM, David Jones wrote:
We are getting closer to having complete rulesets working again.
NOTE: The latest ruleset generated hours ago is still not quite
complete but I think it's safe for testing. I have applied this
ruleset to my platforms.
REV=1815188
wget http://sa-upd
On 11/14/2017 04:37 PM, Rafael Leiva-Ochoa wrote:
If you need testers, please let me know, I can help.
We are getting closer to having complete rulesets working again.
NOTE: The latest ruleset generated hours ago is still not quite complete
but I think it's safe for testing. I have applied
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:23:46 -0800
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> ~$ rblcheck 81.17.24.158
...
> 81.17.24.158 listed by xbl.spamhaus.org
It's a shared VPN address, so I'm not surprised.
Hi Sebastian,
I have a firm of solicitors as clients and they get these same highly
targeted emails. They are much more sophisticated and have caused us
some problems already.
All I can do is keep reminding them to check that the email is authentic.
Some Solicitors have started adding a war
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:41 +, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> The emails often contain links to various popular cloud platforms -
> such as SharePoint, DropBox etc. Most of the emails come from clean
> domains, or from large webmail providers.
>
I'd say there is not a lot you can do if the legit so
I have noticed in the last half a year or so the rise in much more
focused email campaigns. I have some solicitor and accountant clients
who receive these scam emails which are a notch above the rest. The
English is good and correctly spelled. The footers look professional and
just like the one
11 matches
Mail list logo
