On 25 Dec 2017, at 3:28 (-0500), Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Also, any idea why are there 6 different rules associated with this
particular whitelist?
IADB has many independent return codes that each have distinct meaning.
See
http://www.isipp.com/email-accreditation/about-the-codes/list-of-codes
On 25/12/17 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.12.2017 um 09:28 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 23/12/17 10:01, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The 1st step is that a representaive of the rbl asks us to consider
for inclusion.
Thank you. If enough people receive spam sanctioned by a particular
whiteli
I certainly look at all fns and fps and make changes to try and fix things in
the overall ecosystem.
If you have evidence of such problems, throw it in pastebin.
Beyond that I don't usually focus on one rule and you can always override
scores / disable rules in your own cf file.
I don't reme
On 23/12/17 10:01, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The 1st step is that a representaive of the rbl asks us to consider for
inclusion.
Thank you. If enough people receive spam sanctioned by a particular
whitelist, will the minus scores associated with their rule(s) be
reduced over time? Also, any idea
