I certainly look at all fns and fps and make changes to try and fix things in 
the overall ecosystem.  

If you have evidence of such problems, throw it in pastebin.

Beyond that I don't usually focus on one rule and you can always override 
scores / disable rules in your own cf file.

I don't remember about iadb but I know isipp is open to input.  You should ask 
them about the 6 rules.
Merry Christmas,
KAM

On December 25, 2017 3:28:11 AM EST, Sebastian Arcus <s.ar...@open-t.co.uk> 
wrote:
>On 23/12/17 10:01, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> The 1st step is that a representaive of the rbl asks us to consider
>for 
>> inclusion.
>
>Thank you. If enough people receive spam sanctioned by a particular 
>whitelist, will the minus scores associated with their rule(s) be 
>reduced over time? Also, any idea why are there 6 different rules 
>associated with this particular whitelist?
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> KAM
>> 
>> On December 23, 2017 3:03:26 AM EST, Sebastian Arcus 
>> <s.ar...@open-t.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>     What is the process of including whitelists in SA default
>configs? It is
>>     not the first time I see pretty obvious mailing list spam which
>has
>>     quite high minus scores from 2-3 whitelists included in SA:
>> 
>>     -1.5 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN     RBL: IADB: All mailing list mail is
>opt-in
>>                                    [205.201.128.83
><http://205.201.128.83>  listed iniadb.isipp.com
><http://iadb.isipp.com>]
>>     -0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_DK        RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Domain
>Keys record
>>     -0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS      RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS
>record
>>     -0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_SENDERID  RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Sender ID
>record
>>     -2.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED   RBL: ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for
>sender
>>     -0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF       RBL: IADB: Sender publishes SPF
>record
>>     -0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED    RBL: Participates in the IADB system
>>     -0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN_GT50 RBL: IADB: Opt-in used more than 50%
>of the
>>     time
>> 
>> 
>>     For the same message, Pyzor has a high score - which is correct:
>> 
>>     2.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above
>50%
>>                                    [cf: 100]
>>     2.5 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2
>(http://razor.sf.net/)
>> 

Reply via email to