On 23/12/17 10:01, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The 1st step is that a representaive of the rbl asks us to consider for
inclusion.
Thank you. If enough people receive spam sanctioned by a particular
whitelist, will the minus scores associated with their rule(s) be
reduced over time? Also, any idea why are there 6 different rules
associated with this particular whitelist?
Regards,
KAM
On December 23, 2017 3:03:26 AM EST, Sebastian Arcus
<s.ar...@open-t.co.uk> wrote:
What is the process of including whitelists in SA default configs? It is
not the first time I see pretty obvious mailing list spam which has
quite high minus scores from 2-3 whitelists included in SA:
-1.5 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN RBL: IADB: All mailing list mail is opt-in
[205.201.128.83 <http://205.201.128.83> listed
iniadb.isipp.com <http://iadb.isipp.com>]
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_DK RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Domain Keys record
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_SENDERID RBL: IADB: Sender publishes Sender ID record
-2.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED RBL: ISIPP IADB lists as vouched-for sender
-0.1 RCVD_IN_IADB_SPF RBL: IADB: Sender publishes SPF record
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_LISTED RBL: Participates in the IADB system
-0.0 RCVD_IN_IADB_OPTIN_GT50 RBL: IADB: Opt-in used more than 50% of the
time
For the same message, Pyzor has a high score - which is correct:
2.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
2.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
