Woohoo!
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:46 Michael Monnerie
wrote:
> Thanks for reporting, took a long time, but the update is done and
> sha256/sha512 is generated from now on.
>
> mit freundlichen Grüssen,
> Michael Monnerie, Ing. BScmich...@proteger.at | Tel: +43 660
> 415 65 31
"Bill Cole" writes:
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection
>> from localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: setuid to
>> imaps succeeded
>> Oct 22
On 22 Oct 2018, at 11:08, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
"Bill Cole" writes:
On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
spamd.
Is
Bowie Bailey writes:
> On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>>
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
>> localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
>> Oct
I've seen the following message and others similar:
spamd[20463]: rules: meta test KAM_VERY_MALWARE has dependency
'KAM_RAPTOR' with a zero score
what is spamassassin trying to tell me?
--
Peter L. Berghold
Professonally: IT Professional (DevOps, Puppet,
On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>
> When I run it again I see in the logging:
> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
> localhost [::1]:58764 to port 783, fd 5
> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three
rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in
Hello!
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in message + short or no subject
If it wasn't
--On Monday, October 22, 2018 3:46 PM + Emanuel Gonzalez
wrote:
rpm for Centos 7???
If you're comfortable rebuilding a source RPM, see my thread on using the
Fedora 29 SRPM on CentOS 7. If you've modified your sysconfig file, you'll
need to remove the daemon switch to use it with that
"Bill Cole" writes:
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
>> (EX_IOERR: IO error).
>
> This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
> spamd.
>
> Is spamd running?
Yes, spamd is running.
rpm for Centos 7???
Hello,
from one day to the next I stop working the service, I have 14 servers with
spamassassin and they all return this error message:
Oct 22 10:58:10 eternia13 spamd[14361]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
Oct 22 10:58:10 eternia13
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:56:34 +0200
Daniele Duca wrote:
> On 22/10/2018 12:37, Paul Stead wrote:
>
> >
> > This can be resolved by hashing the BTC address before lookup and
> > looking up the result hash in the DB
> >
> > Paul
> >
> Yes, thanks for the suggestions, I would have done that in the
On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
(EX_IOERR: IO error).
This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
spamd.
Is spamd running?
Is spamd listening on the socket that spamc is trying to
Good morning everyone,
After the feedback from ComDev and discussions with Dr. Daniel, I'm
happy to report that Self-Employed and Retired people are now eligible.
Also, the survey now allows for skipping any questions that are too
personal.
We need more samples and would appreciate if you could
On 22/10/2018 12:37, Paul Stead wrote:
This can be resolved by hashing the BTC address before lookup and looking up
the result hash in the DB
Paul
Yes, thanks for the suggestions, I would have done that in the next
version coming up in the following days, where I'd also populate the
list
On 22/10/2018, 10:41, "Daniele Duca" wrote:
On 21/10/2018 09:15, Henrik K wrote:
> I wonder who's going to be the first to offer public bitcoin DNS
blacklist,
> I could make plugin for it. :-)
>
> In the meantime, here's something to try..
>
I've got a beta public
On 21/10/2018 09:15, Henrik K wrote:
I wonder who's going to be the first to offer public bitcoin DNS blacklist,
I could make plugin for it. :-)
In the meantime, here's something to try..
Hi,
I mantain a local rbldnsd zone with abused BTC addresses (btw, thanks
for bitcoinabuse.com, I
Thanks Henrik!!
It is unbelievable but if you check those BTC wallets from the Stort
campaings people is paying!
-PedroD
19 matches
Mail list logo
