Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Miles Fidelman
On 7/24/20 7:41 PM, Noel Butler wrote: On 24/07/2020 23:26, Benny Pedersen wrote: Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57: because it shits trolls like you off https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8IkQZsir2aUw-H919hk dunno what you referenced benny I

Re: Constructive solution to the blacklist thread

2020-07-24 Thread micah anderson
Noel Butler writes: [weird rant deleted] > There are 192 _other_ countries in the world, the USA is united states There are 194 other countries in the world. -- micah

Re: Constructive solution to the blacklist thread

2020-07-24 Thread Noel Butler
On 25/07/2020 04:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I'd say too many people without merit and knowledge of the project > spouting off building on misinformation and rants more fitting for a > racist channel on 4chan would be my analysis of what started the discussion. here we go again, attacking peopl

Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Noel Butler
On 24/07/2020 23:26, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57: > >> because it shits trolls like you off > > https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8IkQZsir2aUw-H919hk dunno what you referenced benny I only click on links that are from f

Re: BIMI pilot at Google

2020-07-24 Thread Luis E. Muñoz
On 24 Jul 2020, at 12:22, John Hardin wrote: Does that certificate include some kind of checksum of the logo image itself? If not, what is to prevent a spammer from obtaining all the needed certificates, and then changing the logo image they are hosting to match the entity they are spoofing?

Re: BIMI pilot at Google

2020-07-24 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, Luis E. Muñoz wrote: On 23 Jul 2020, at 0:56, Laurent S. wrote: BIMI requires DMARC, which is much easier to implement if you are a phisher creating a brand new domain .xyz with all the right SPF, DKIM, DMARC and BIMI. Putting the paypal logo on that .xyz domain and there

Re: Constructive solution to the blacklist thread

2020-07-24 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/24/2020 3:59 AM, Marc Roos wrote: > >> you will be able to change 1 byte in the code and get the previous > rule names. > > This sounds to me like putting somewhere the character 0 or 1, which > means that blacklist and whitelist words are still defined somewhere in > the code. Is that not

Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
Arrg do we have to invoke the "Toilet Rule"* ? Would everyone calm down if Kevin would promise to never make another change to bow to the gods of Political Correctness? Kevin, would you be humble enough to make this promise and admit you stepped in a pile of caw-caw? I'm sure the real spammers

Re: BIMI pilot at Google

2020-07-24 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
"Go ahead and support it if you want but please don't pretend it's purpose is to make things safer." Sorry you took that wrong it was not aimed at you. I will restate that to make it more clear,here: "Go ahead and support it if you want but please, nobody pretend it's purpose is to make thi

Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57: because it shits trolls like you off https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8IkQZsir2aUw-H919hk

Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Noel Butler
On 24/07/2020 22:01, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 03:24: > >> The fact the OP never included you means they knew you were being >> sarcastic, kevin cant see that because he is in total defensive mode, >> he thought people would suck up his dictatorship and roll over an

Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 03:24: The fact the OP never included you means they knew you were being sarcastic, kevin cant see that because he is in total defensive mode, he thought people would suck up his dictatorship and roll over and move on, but he was so so so wrong. is PMC members

Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Jeroen de Neef
I think that one of the reasons why more and more people dogpile on the conversation is because a lot of people have already dogpiled on it. I've been in this mailing list since 2015 and this has been the loudest thread I've noticed since then. On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Marc Roos wrote: > >

RE: Constructive solution to the blacklist thread

2020-07-24 Thread Marc Roos
>> you will be able to change 1 byte in the code and get the previous rule names. This sounds to me like putting somewhere the character 0 or 1, which means that blacklist and whitelist words are still defined somewhere in the code. Is that not what started the discussion? But none the less,

RE: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever

2020-07-24 Thread Marc Roos
>> I do wish that the handful of loud, non-contributors who have so >> much to say about someone else’s project would shut up and fork it, TBH. Is that not a lot like, this is my toilet it is only for white people, please build your own somewhere else, you are free to do so?