On 6/5/22 6:31 pm, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
For unrelated reasons I had to turn off IPv6 on my incoming mailserver.
Spam plummeted. Like by 80% at least. Both uncaught and caught spam
did.
Were there more hostname variations with records than A records?
--
Jeremy
OpenPGP_signatu
I agree with what Grant said.
Also, I wonder how much greylisting would help, and if you were already
doing that. The data I posted is for a machine that already does
greylisting in general, with varying times depending on inclusion in
various RBLs and local data.
I find that delaying connectio
On 5/6/22 10:49 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Arg. Well I think you hit the nail on the head. And I think I may
have stumbled on to a spam defeating trick.
Ya ... not running email server on IPv6 is a way of not receiving (some)
spam. But I view it very similarly as not running an email serve
> we wait for spamassassin 4.0.0 :=)
>
> 4.0.0 is in pre-release now and in production for a few of us. Start
stress testing it now so we can shake out the bugs and get it out the door!
Regards,
KAM
Just got one as well, deciding how to handle it...
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:52 PM Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Oh joy.
> On 5/6/2022 11:19 AM, Dave Wreski wrote:
>
> Hi, Intuit's servers are being used to send Paypal phishing invoices
> combined with the "evil numbers" scam.
>
> --
> Kevin A. mcgra
On 5/6/22 11:31, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2022-05-06 at 10:58:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 6 May 2022 09:58:15 -0500)
Thomas Cameron
is rumored to have said:
Howdy, all -
As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for
BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to
Oh joy.
On 5/6/2022 11:19 AM, Dave Wreski wrote:
Hi, Intuit's servers are being used to send Paypal phishing invoices
combined with the "evil numbers" scam.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linked
I’ve had it running against a mariadb galera setup for a few years now. Have
not experienced any issues here. Did not have to take any special actions on
SpamAssassins side, just pointed it at a dns round robin entry for the backend
servers and setup appropriate access perms for them.
-Darre
Arg. Well I think you hit the nail on the head. And I think I may have
stumbled on to a spam defeating trick. Here's what I think MAY be going on.
As we all know spammers are the textbook drive by shooters. They are
going to try the first A returned from the mailserver just like a
regular m
On 2022-05-06 at 10:58:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 6 May 2022 09:58:15 -0500)
Thomas Cameron
is rumored to have said:
> Howdy, all -
>
> As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for
> BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to get back
> into it. Sorry if
Hi, Intuit's servers are being used to send Paypal phishing invoices
combined with the "evil numbers" scam.
https://pastebin.com/iad07S8N
Received: from o4.e.notification.intuit.com
(o4.e.notification.intuit.com [167.89.82.160])
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.691 tagged_above=-200 required=5
te
Howdy, all -
As I mentioned in a previous email, I'm trying to bump up the score for
BAYES_999. I have not messed with SA in years, but I'm trying to get
back into it. Sorry if this is a silly question.
I tried to add the following line to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf,
but it's not firing
On 2022-05-06 12:21, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
But I read that redis doesn’t have per-user databases?
nope, pr user bayes needs one database in redis, not multiple pr user
And I probably
would need new machines with lots of RAM for it, because I have no
idea how much RAM is needed per user.
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
> For unrelated reasons I had to turn off IPv6 on my incoming mailserver.
>
> Spam plummeted. Like by 80% at least. Both uncaught and caught spam did.
>
> When IPv6 was on, the mailserver had all PTR and and MX records to
> allow it to receive incoming mail via IP
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 12:31:47PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote:
> On 5/6/22 11:08, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access to
> > the data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking into having per user
> > bayes-databases an
On 5/6/22 11:08, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the
> data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking into having per user
> bayes-databases and saw that I can do that with a SQL-database. I have
> already a small galera-c
Hi All,
I hope this does not start a holy war.
For unrelated reasons I had to turn off IPv6 on my incoming mailserver.
Spam plummeted. Like by 80% at least. Both uncaught and caught spam did.
When IPv6 was on, the mailserver had all PTR and and MX records to
allow it to receive incoming
On 6 May 2022, at 11:31, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2022-05-06 11:25, Henrik K wrote:
>> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the
>>> data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking
On 2022-05-06 11:25, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
Hi,
I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access
to the
data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking into having per user
bayes-databases and saw that I can do that
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:08:21AM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the
> data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking into having per user
> bayes-databases and saw that I can do that with a SQL-database. I have alre
Hi,
I have a setup where the spamassassin-servers have actually no access to the
data of the mail-servers. Now I was looking into having per user
bayes-databases and saw that I can do that with a SQL-database. I have already
a small galera-cluster and I wonder if spamassassin will work with it
On 2022-05-06 05:35, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hi Alex, sometimes I see this when the envelope from doesn't match the
header from. So what you think might pass SPF does not. That's my only
guess from looking at the example you posted. That example looked like
it would work perfectly.
we wait for
On 05.05.22 18:01, Alex wrote:
I'm trying to understand why some domains are not whitelisted even
though they pass SPF and are in my local welcomelist_auth entries. I'm
using policyd-spf with postfix, and it appears to be adding the
following header:
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay
23 matches
Mail list logo
