On 08/04/2024 11:40, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Now here's my question (at least one of them)... I send the validation
email from DoNotReply
So... recommendations, please... should I change donotre...@.com to
something else, and if so, what is
Typically, noreply@... is used
Have you tried us
GMail just... sucks. I have an email server in EC2 that also passes all
tests, but they insist on dumping our emails into users' spam folders.
Good luck trying to get anyone at GMail to actually do their jobs and
change whatever is causing them to mark your emails as spam. In my case,
they are
On 4/8/24 5:44 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
- make your systems transparent so that people feel they understand
what's happening and when at different stages in the process - don't
create a "corporate black box" which customers can't understand
I'll add to this and say that URLs that include things
Hi
Jimmy in SA like:
There might be some Spam/Phishing emails with null sender so
spamassassin will help you block it if you configured them correctly..
header SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN Return-Path =~ /<>/
describe SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN spamik
score SPAM_FROM_NO_DOMAIN
Hi
Problem solved: user in wbl sql add in amavis_recipients his domain
W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:50, Jimmy pisze:
According to RFC 2298, the envelope sender address (SMTP MAIL FROM) of
the Message Disposition Notification (MDN) must be null (<>). This
specification indicates that no Delivery St
According to RFC 2298, the envelope sender address (SMTP MAIL FROM) of the
Message Disposition Notification (MDN) must be null (<>). This
specification indicates that no Delivery Status Notification (DSN) messages
or other notifications about successful or unsuccessful delivery should be
sent in re
On Monday 08 April 2024 at 05:15:58, Grant Taylor via users wrote:
> Below is my opinion, it's worth everything you paid for it. But I do
> suggest you read it and think about it for a few minutes.
For what it's worth, I thoroughly agree with these opinions.
- don't alienate people by sending
W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:38, Benny Pedersen pisze:
natan skrev den 2024-04-08 12:31:
Apr 6 01:15:09 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Passed
BAD-HEADER-7 {RelayedInbound}, [34.23.17.0]:38582 [34.23.17.0] <>
-> , Queue-ID: 4VBDq04Bn7z1Q9qQ, mail_id:
6LRhEwtUmP7u, Hits: -, size: 10888, queued_
natan skrev den 2024-04-08 12:31:
Apr 6 01:15:09 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Passed
BAD-HEADER-7 {RelayedInbound}, [34.23.17.0]:38582 [34.23.17.0] <>
-> , Queue-ID: 4VBDq04Bn7z1Q9qQ, mail_id:
6LRhEwtUmP7u, Hits: -, size: 10888, queued_as: 4VBDq06n69z1Q9q1,
358 ms
I check and I not f
W dniu 8.04.2024 o 12:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
On 08.04.24 12:09, natan wrote:
I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted"
...
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl:
whitelisted sender <>,
...
Log:
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking
On 08.04.24 12:09, natan wrote:
I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted"
...
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted
sender <>,
...
Log:
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking:
6LRhEwtUmP7u [34.23.17.0] <> ->
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavi
Hi
I use amavis+SA and In log I get "whitlisted"
...
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) wbl: whitelisted
sender <>,
...
Log:
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-17) Checking:
6LRhEwtUmP7u [34.23.17.0] <> ->
Apr 6 01:15:08 amavis3 amavis[3887068]: (3887068-1
12 matches
Mail list logo