Re: DKIM length 'l=' tag

2024-06-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 03.06.24 11:16, Marc wrote: Hi Andrew, this is a bit of topic, I posted this a while ago on the mailing list. But did you notice by any chance that eg. hotmail.com is failing every dkim verification (except their sender rewritten messages)? I have checked yesterdays logs on one machine:

Re: Lots of FN because of VALIDITY* rules

2024-06-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 2024-06-03 at 08:35:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:32 +0200) postgarage Graz IT is rumored to have said: I think that the active.list file should be updated, when there are new rules, shouldn't it? On 03.06.24 08:52, Bill Cole wrote: It is updated where it is actually used, on the ASF r

Fwd: [mailop] SORBS Closing.

2024-06-05 Thread Frido Otten
A little heads-up from the MailOp mailinglist. So is there anything that needs to be done to prevent false positives happening right after the shutdown? Doorgestuurd bericht Onderwerp: [mailop] SORBS Closing. Datum: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 10:36:58 +1000 Van:Michelle Sul

Re: [mailop] SORBS Closing.

2024-06-05 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Nothing will *need* to be done.SORBS *should* be removed from all configurations at the earliest opportunity.SORBS will be shut down properly with the DNS servers and zones returning delagation and empty zones for multiple years (should be 10+.. but that depends on whether Proofpoint exists in 10 y

Re: Fwd: [mailop] SORBS Closing.

2024-06-05 Thread Rob McEwen via users
From "Frido Otten" So is there anything that needs to be done to prevent false positives happening right after the shutdown? They said they were emptying the zone files, not actually "listing the world" - so this shouldn't cause false any positives - but might cause some false negatives, e

Re: Lots of FN because of VALIDITY* rules

2024-06-05 Thread postgarage Graz IT
On 6/5/24 09:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 2024-06-03 at 08:35:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:32 +0200) postgarage Graz IT is rumored to have said: I think that the active.list file should be updated, when there are new rules, shouldn't it? On 03.06.24 08:52, Bill Cole wrote: It

Re: Lots of FN because of VALIDITY* rules

2024-06-05 Thread postgarage Graz IT
On 6/5/24 11:14, postgarage Graz IT wrote: On 6/5/24 09:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 2024-06-03 at 08:35:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:32 +0200) postgarage Graz IT is rumored to have said: I think that the active.list file should be updated, when there are new rules, shouldn'

Re: Lots of FN because of VALIDITY* rules

2024-06-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 2024-06-03 at 08:35:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:32 +0200) postgarage Graz IT is rumored to have said: I think that the active.list file should be updated, when there are new rules, shouldn't it? On 03.06.24 08:52, Bill Cole wrote: It is updated where it is actually used, on the ASF r

Re: Lots of FN because of VALIDITY* rules

2024-06-05 Thread postgarage Graz IT
On 6/5/24 13:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 2024-06-03 at 08:35:32 UTC-0400 (Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:35:32 +0200) postgarage Graz IT is rumored to have said: I think that the active.list file should be updated, when there are new rules, shouldn't it? On 03.06.24 08:52, Bill Cole wrote: It