You do use 'spamassassin --lint' when you're writing new rules, correct?
Sincerely,
Adam Lanier
Voyant Strategies Inc.
-Original Message-
From: David Michaels [mailto:micha...@ucrwcu.rwc.uc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:35 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: header To =~ question
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 17:19 -0500, David Zinder wrote:
I think my problem is related to surbl.org, but I can't figure out how
to reach them. list.surbl.org times out, and has for several weeks.
I had been using Spamassassin 3.1.5 under RHEL 3. Works great, until Jan
1, 2008. I started
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:54 +0200, Christian Nygaard wrote:
How do I write a local spamassassin rule that matches received from
header mail?.example.com . I've tried
writing a header matching rule but it doesnt seem to work. Can you
show a short example
of a working header matching rule for
Forwarded Message
From: Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Lanier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:04:09 -0700
And I've put you on my blackhole list.
Adam Lanier wrote:
On Tue, 2007
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 08:30 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Screw you.
Congratulations, you have been permanently added to my kill file.
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 12:25 -0400, Kevin Plested wrote:
I'm trying to add a new plugin to Spamassassin, I located my plugin
directory on my server:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/
by searching on my server for URIDNSBL.pm.
When I put my new plugin into
Peter Russell wrote:
Sorry last question - seems the parent company is doing spam checks
and adds the spam score to the headers.
How could i add/change the second condition for a spam score greater
than 10.00 ?
the header is X-Spam-Score: *** (11.507)
Many thanks
Pete
To ask
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 00:55 +1000, Pete Russell wrote:
adam lanier wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 00:37 +1000, Pete Russell wrote:
How do i write a rule that says;
header __GATEWAY_RELAY Received =~ /\[111\.222\.333\]/
so in this line the ip address is only the 1st 3 sections
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 00:37 +1000, Pete Russell wrote:
How do i write a rule that says;
if mail is recieved from parent company email gateway/s AND the from
address is not from the parent company domain THEN give XX score.
Something like?
header __GATEWAY_RELAY Received =~
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 16:06 +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, adam lanier wrote:
Shouldn't it be:
From !~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
meta SPAM_FROM_RELAY__GATEWAY_RELAY __NOT_PAR_DOMAIN
yep, i'm 0 for 2 today, time to keep quiet.
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 09:01 -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Again, I have a 100% stock SA configuration.
No you don't have a 100% stock config. There are at least two
differences relevant to them message you posted:
1) you have
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 23:31 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
No, the charset isn't triggering the base64 rules. The fact that the
Content-Transfer-Encoding declares the message is base-64 encoded is
causing it.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
As for LW_STOCK_SPAM4, it's being triggered by the
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 07:25 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
When I run spamassassin --lint I see a number of rule-related warnings.
However, when I look in /etc/mail/spamassassin/rules/ I can't find the
specific text referenced.
Here's the pertinent lint output:
snip
Unless you've
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 11:26 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
I was looking in the wrong file, it should be 50_scores.cf. And, in that
file there are:
score DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 0 0.306 0 0.231
score DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0 0.479 0 0.200
score DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX 0 2.034 0 1.945
score
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:38 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/20/06, Jon Ribbens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John D. Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...sign up with a service like Habeas or Bonded Sender and put their
headers in your messages?
I suppose we could do. Does anyone know how
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 16:58 +, Jon Ribbens wrote:
But that's all a bit philosophical and beside the point of my
question, which is: should I change our emails, and if so, in what
way - or do SpamAssassin's default settings as provided on
updates.spamassassin.org need changing?
Perhaps
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:00 -0500, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Apparently a remote server is having issues-
It keeps sending this message here-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I blacklist a message without blacklisting the sender?
Is the sending host someone that you care about receiving messages from?
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 08:43 -0800, Bret Miller wrote:
I'd like something quasi-official if possible, so I can tell my
bosses: according to this report, even with diligent spam filtering,
xx% of the email people receive is still spam. If fewer than xx% of
your email is spam, we're ahead of
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:14 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
According to the home page for the script
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Add a TRUSTED_RULESETS line to your config file that contains the
names of the rulesets you chose. Example below:
*
No comments whatsoever?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I am looking into switching from a global bayes/awl/setting environment
to a per-user environment with MySQL as a backend.
puts on asbestos suit
Would anyone care to offer an opinion as to whether and/or to what
degree this might make in overall effectiveness? Anyone back up that
opinion with
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 12:36 -0700, Ken A wrote:
Anyone else seen this one?
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554hvuip.html
Seems rather harsh, but probably quite effective.
As reported on the SPAM-L mailing list, this was an error on AOL's part.
According to AOL, they've removed the rule
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 12:52 -0700, Ken A wrote:
The web page says that it's a policy, not an error. Perhaps the rule
misfired and they backed it out, but it looks like they have every
intention of blocking URLs in email that consist of IPs rather than
hostnames.
Perhaps we're speaking
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 10:28 -0500, Steve Ingraham wrote:
I have been attempting to update SA rules using Rules Du Jour.
Whenever I run the Rules Du Jour script an error is generated. The
error is shown below as it was emailed to my account.
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line,
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:55 +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 12:10 Will Nordmeyer wrote:
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
Remember that this should be a file name. You showed a dir, maybe
there's the problem?
The bayes_path should actually point to a
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
a response/spam score from the
nastiness.
Thanks,
- --
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBuL3cyiJGTGcJL0cRAv3kAJ0f3ldqM0H6noaaSJ+H4z7EdyY4ewCcDnIT
7wNUFp4StciPxLaWzUIN9bs
each and I'll post the results.
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Mathieu Nantel wrote:
Good day,
I'm sorry if that question has been answered before, but I could not find an
answer.
Is there a command / way that will show how many spams and hams have been
learned by the Bayesian filter?
sa-learn --dump magic
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment
29 matches
Mail list logo
