On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:38 -0600, Noel Jones wrote: > On 12/20/06, Jon Ribbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...sign up with a service like Habeas or Bonded Sender and put their > > > headers in your messages? > > > > I suppose we could do. Does anyone know how much that costs? > > > > It still seems wrong to me though that SpamAssassin is penalising mail > > that doesn't look like spam, and encouraging people to make their ham > > look like spam. > > > > So why not find which rules are triggered by your message and just > rewrite your message so it doesn't trigger those rules? Can't be too > hard, spammers do it all the time. > > I find very few legit messages - even legit marketing mail - get > tagged as spam. > > If you're not sending spam, why does it look like spam? Find out and > fix the problem! >
That's why I asked to see a sample message. We could probably give some pointers on what is triggering SA.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
