David B Funk wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>> By default messages bigger than 500KB are not sent to spamd for
>> processing/scanning => the tactics you describe frequently "turns off"
>> spam filtering.
>>
>> IMHO SA s
Mark London wrote:
> Hi - Sorry if this has been discussed before. I'm seeing a lot of
> html spam with a few links, followed by a line that just contains
>
Robert Kudyba wrote:
> n*5s delay *may* indicate unresponsive DNS host(s)/resolver(s) in /etc/hots
> [ at least it should be ruled out ]
>
> Nah both are university DNS servers that are current.
>
> How long does it take to get SMTP greeting message when you start
> "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs" a
Robert Kudyba wrote:
> Over the past few days sending mail via SquirrelMail has become glacial. The
> load on the server is under 1. I've restarted the SA, sendmail and dovecot
> processes several times. Here are
> some logs I can provide any settings if desired.
>
> Jul 13 23:03:24 storm sendma
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/alleged-russian-hacker-arrested-in-spain-at-us-request/2017/04/10/3e4830e6-1dd9-11e7-bb59-a74ccaf1d02f_story.html?utm_term=.cc6e6c5d10c7
>
>
> Regards,
> KAM
Americans are unable to spam without Russian help, aren't th
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 23/12/16 10:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>> I know this hot potato has been discussed before - but I'm afraid it's
>> back to haunt me and I can't fathom it out. I'm getting again different
>> bayes results if I test a message on the command line, compared to it
>> going
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:50:20 -0700
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> Or you could run dovecot and its sieve plugin. Sieve is a real standard
>> (RFC 5228) which procmail never was.
>
> It may be a standard, but it's nowhere near as flexible as Perl. I have very
> unusual fil
On 11/16/2013 01:34 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>
>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>
>> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
>> alternate?
>
> It a
On 05/17/2013 06:08 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:48 +0200
> Axb wrote:
>
> [Re domain name ends with digits]
>
>> my LOUD +1 to remove/disable this rule for good.
>> anybody else?
>
> Yes, +1. Rules like this and the 12-char-domain rule
> are much too dangerous.
IMHO
On 04/22/2013 03:27 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 03:52 AM, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>> On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
>>> should insert a new rule
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> [...]
> I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
> should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
> the X-Spam-Level header. But since it uses asterisks, which are
> interpreted as regex wildcar
On 02/19/2013 10:29 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>> On 02/19/2013 08:53 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/19/2013 03:47 AM, Dan
On 02/19/2013 08:53 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>> On 02/19/2013 03:47 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>>> Spamcop has an undocumented feature that they allow you (if they trust
>>> you) to "quic
On 02/19/2013 03:47 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Spamcop has an undocumented feature that they allow you (if they trust
> you) to "quick report" spam, where you send to a different mail address,
> and it's reported instantly, without having to hit the web interface.
> When you do this, yo
On 12/03/2012 09:43 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:03:25 +0200
> Henrik K wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:54:44PM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> [Test loadavg in filtering decisions]
>
>> Seems kind of pointless. Have you actually measured how larger
>> messages affect
On 11/29/2012 09:53 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:19 +0100
> "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote:
>
>> Do you treat "yahoo like" spam sources in the same way?
> With respect to greylisting, of course. If a machine passes greylisting once,
> i
On 11/29/2012 09:31 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 12:27, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>> On 11/29/2012 08:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Also, once a given IP passes greylisting, we remember that and we don't
>>> greylist that server for
On 11/29/2012 08:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> [...]
> Also, once a given IP passes greylisting, we remember that and we don't
> greylist that server for 40 days. If you have a large-enough user population,
> this can greatly mitigate the problems caused by initial greylisting delays.
Do you trea
On 07/12/2012 09:01 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:50:59 +0200
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> spf does not solve spam problems in general, its may only one from
>> many parameters for spam tagging check
> Indeed. I *never* subtract points for an SPF "pass" except for a very
>
On 06/03/2012 11:44 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> I am getting $SUBJECT on my RHEL6 box running sendmail, spamassassin,
> spamass-milter, clamav-milter, and milter-greylist. My sendmail.mc
> looks like this:
>
> [root@spamcatcher ~]# grep -v "^dnl" /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
> []
> define(`confTO_IDEN
On 05/29/2012 09:58 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> This idea is growing out of a thread I started in which someone pointed me
> to https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3062
>
> Ignoring the locale under which SA runs and also ignoring the character
> encoding of the message can make
21 matches
Mail list logo
