On 11/29/2012 08:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: > [...] > Also, once a given IP passes greylisting, we remember that and we don't > greylist that server for 40 days. If you have a large-enough user population, > this can greatly mitigate the problems caused by initial greylisting delays. Do you treat "yahoo like" spam sources in the same way?
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Usi... Olivier Nicole
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway... Ed Flecko
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gat... Robert Schetterer
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gat... John Hardin
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM... Ed Flecko
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM... Ned Slider
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti... Dave Warren
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using Op... Frederic De Mees
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Usi... vectro
- Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" ... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secur... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-S... Dave Warren
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fai... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-S... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fai... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... John Levine
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... John Hardin
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... Dave Warren
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... Dave Warren