On 11/29/2012 09:53 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:19 +0100 > "Andrzej A. Filip" <andrzej.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do you treat "yahoo like" spam sources in the same way? > With respect to greylisting, of course. If a machine passes greylisting once, > it's extremely likely to pass it in future and it's an utter waste of > time to greylist it. Does greylisting increase chances of bulk detectors (razor/pyzor/dcc) in case of "yahoo like" spam sources? [ based on your experience ]
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM... Ed Flecko
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM... Ned Slider
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti... Dave Warren
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using Op... Frederic De Mees
- Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Usi... vectro
- Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" ... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secur... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-S... Dave Warren
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fai... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-S... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fai... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... John Levine
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... John Hardin
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... David F. Skoll
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... Dave Warren
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "... Dave Warren
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fai... John Hardin
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secur... Robert Schetterer
- Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secur... Matt