history, shown
now as Status: RESOLVED, Resolution: FIXED.
However, a CPAN installation attempted a few moments ago failed as
per the original bug report.
Presumably, Justin's committed patch of 18 Jun 2007 hasn't yet made
its way to the CPAN servers?
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Edwards schrieb:
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Stephen Carter wrote:
Hi guys,
I've tried to install SA 3.2.0 on both an unpatched and fully patched
fail #8
Output can be examined in: log/d.spamc_z/out.1
t/spamc_z...FAILED tests 2-9
Failed 8/9 tests, 11.11% okay
Same result here, attempting to update via cpan on Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS.
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To read:
SPAMD_BIN=/usr/bin/spamd
Then stop and restart spamd and use the YaST Runlevel Editor to
configure spamd to automatically start in runlevels 3 5, that should
provide a resolution for you.
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
exit
if ($SIZE 10)
xfilter spamc
if (/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/)
to Mail/junk
(etc)
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 06:12:53PM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:04:58AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
I removed all SpamAssassin files earlier this evening and re-installed
using cpan. With hindsight, I believe I could have simply done what
you have suggested
version could be amended so
that spamd is installed in /usr/sbin rather than /usr/bin, which
is I understand what the Debian package maintainers have done (that
wouldn't assist users who have already upgraded, of course).
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:04:58AM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
I removed all SpamAssassin files earlier this evening and re-installed
using cpan. With hindsight, I believe I could have simply done what
you have suggested above. I run a SuSE 8.2 system, and persuading
manual configuration
.
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
seems to rule out it being a
local configuration issue?).
--
Anthony Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:51:54PM +0100, Anthony Edwards wrote:
I have also been unable to persuade spamd to add spamassassin headers,
as per my posting of last night to the list. Running spamassassin, in
contrast, seems to work properly (which seems to rule out it being a
local
11 matches
Mail list logo
