I keep getting this error generated in the console (OS X 10.4.8 with
Perl 5.8.6 I believe).
Dec 25 18:49:07 mail spamd[2660]: Use of uninitialized value in
string eq at /etc/mail/spamassassin/Botnet.pm line 564, line
69.\n
Eventually the spamd child processes stop processing and then fin
Yes, everyone is correct that I called a challenge-response
incorrectly as greylisting. Sorry about that. Greylisting on CG Pro
however is implemented a little differently... I can adjust the
initial SMTP response time so it isn't specific to a user but
accomplishes the same thing. Regardle
My name is Ron, and I run a mail server.
I wanted to mention something that I've started doing to help those
of our users who just barely can do email much less discriminate
email spam from the packaged meat product. This idea may not be new
at all but Justin Mason suggested that I go ahead
Hmmm. You mistake Verizon for someone who gives a care I think.
(Indeed this list will get this reply but most assuredly since
Verizon chooses to blacklist everyone outside Verizon as a solution
to spam.)
On Jun 2, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
IMO, somebody at VZ needs to have a
Some time back I had announced SquirrelSAP which is a SquirrelMail
plugin that allow users to set the basic settings that most of them
would understand. It's on Source Forge and not in the SquirrelMail web
site (they didn't want my plugin and other that are also there). It may
be helpful along
Is there a problem with emails sent from microsoft word via eamil (and
thus with mime) and SA?
I have one user getting persistent recorrent bounces.
SquirrelSAP 1.0.4 is released.
SquirrelSAP is a plugin for SquirrelMail with a nice, user friendly
interface to the commonly requested features of Spamassassin by our
users. This version corrects a minor problem with regex processing of
the whitelisted and blacklisted email addresses in versi
SquirrelMail, for those that don't know, is an alternative web
interface capable of accessing most of the most popular mail servers.
I've just completed a major rewrite of the SourceForge project for the
Spamassassin PHP-SA_MySQL plugin which I now maintain. This plugin
allows your clients whil
I'm trying to get spamd (Spamassassin's daemon) back up until Daniel
Zimmerman (hopefully) gets CGPSA updated for SQL. I have SQL working
and am incorporating user level sql preferences through a SquirrelMail
plugin that I've developed. (It's really slick too!).
Its been a long time since I us
OK, I've successfully transitioned from 2.63 to 3.0.2 but I have two
questions:
1. The sql users database doesn't seem to be used though it was working
fine in 2.63. I have the following configuration in local.cf. Is there
a plugin or other setting that I need to make this work? (I'm using
CGS
Sorry, but this is not true. Eudora uses also 465.
On Dec 15, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Morris Jones wrote:
David B Funk wrote:
Eudora will not let you set any port other than 25 for outgoing SMTP.
Hopefully these will be fixed soon. I just guessed at the
configuration for my wife's Mac running Eudora, a
I like to think of SPF as my 'license' to use my domain or the domains
that I host to send email as though it is from one of my users. If I
have SPF records, I WANT other mail servers to respect that it is my
wish that ONLY MY authenticated users send email marked as such with my
permission.
I
I thought SURBL was built in to 3.0 was I mistaken?
On Sep 22, 2004, at 4:40 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I just updated Bigevil, which now is 1.25 megs in size. It will
consume the
souls of your server, your family, and that cute girl/guy at your local
coffee shop!
With the release of SA 3.0, for t
Did you go from a 2.6x version up using CPAN?
Does anyone know what version of CGPSA (for CommuniGate Pro) is
required for version 3.0.0?
On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:05 AM, Danie Marais wrote:
Is there an ETA for the CPAN release?
FYI, I have just installed using CPAN.
Kindest regards,
Ron
The me
Hmmm. I just checked my MTA logs for one six-hour period and have 10
SPF fails so that one in 100,000 can't be accurate.
On Sep 14, 2004, at 9:11 AM, Tom Meunier wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the most part and I'd say 99.999 (maybe add more 9's)% of the
time, the SPF result is "None". You c
On Sep 13, 2004, at 9:22 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Codger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you already use a blacklisting host(s) and also use SPF then the
combination would be more effective than either alone, whether the SPF
added or removed points ev
SPF wouldn't add you to a blacklist since it operates realtime (at the
SMTP level). But just because you log in to your home ISP doesn't mean
you can't send mail through your work ISP if you have SMTP
authentication of course.
In that instance you'll know immediately that your SMTP fails and th
than either alone, whether the SPF
added or removed points even.
On Sep 13, 2004, at 3:01 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Codger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin list"
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: SPF a
But still, my recommendation is to use an SPF pass to decrease the spam
score and to not use SFP fails to blacklist.
On Sep 13, 2004, at 1:39 PM, Kelson wrote:
You're misunderstanding. The suggestion was to take spam that passed
SPF, look for the other servers listed in that SPF record, and add
On Sep 11, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Tom Meunier wrote:
If the spammer isn't authoritative for your domain, they can list
everything in the universe as an MX record and it would never be
checked. Unless the spammer owns tone of the three name servers that
is authoritative for bubbanfriends.org, in whi
I don't think it would make any difference if the spammer listed any
other servers in HIS DNS SPF records. Your server won't look at his DNS
for yahoo's SPF records. That's what SPF is all about. It gives the
owner of the domain name exclusive ability to say who is and is not a
valid sender for
I don't think I'll be implementing Sender ID. Sounds like another MS
stab at open source to me:
On Sep 2, 2004, at 1:45 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
http://apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html
On the other side, SPF is really taking off if you look at the
acceptance graphs:
22 matches
Mail list logo
