RE: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules

2005-01-13 Thread Darren Coleman
-Original Message- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 January 2005 01:07 To: Jeff Chan Cc: Darren Coleman; Jack L. Stone; Loren Wilton; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules On Wednesday

Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules

2005-01-12 Thread Darren Coleman
Hi, I'm running the latest version of SpamAssassin (3.0.2), with a healthy Bayes database (I believe) and pretty much all of the available rules from rulesemporium.com and I have noticed recently, particularly from comments from my users, that SA is missing a lot of clear spasm. I have attached

RE: [SPAM-TAG] Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules

2005-01-12 Thread Darren Coleman
: [SPAM-TAG] Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 3:20:17 AM, Darren Coleman wrote: Hi, I'm running the latest version of SpamAssassin (3.0.2), with a healthy Bayes database (I believe) and pretty much all of the available rules

RE: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules

2005-01-12 Thread Darren Coleman
Hi Loren, Firstly, thanks for your help. I have searched around rulesemporium without much success trying to find these LOCAL_OBFU_* rules. I don't suppose you could tell me the filename that they occur in could you? (I assume they will be in /etc/mail/Spamassassin or wherever your local.cf

RE: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules

2005-01-12 Thread Darren Coleman
Hmm.. I got the following on that message (having reconfigured SURBL): Content analysis details: (8.0 points, 5.0 required) 0.3 RM_hm_EmtyMsgidMessage ID is empty, or just spaces - probable spamsign 0.3 SARE_WEOFFER BODY: Offers Something 2.5 MANGLED_CIALIS BODY:

RE: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules

2005-01-12 Thread Darren Coleman
-Original Message- From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 January 2005 15:29 To: Jack L. Stone; Loren Wilton; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp rules Hmm.. I got the following on that message

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Darren Coleman
Is the last line meant as some kind of threat? :) I'm sorry to say but you must have some sort of configuration issue with your install, and I'd suggest to RTFM. I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.00 and have recently less untagged spam (as expected) as a result. - Are you using any additional rulesets