cheidell [scheid...@secnap.net]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:03 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: removing old/stale rules
On 6/11/10 1:00 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since my upgrade to 3.3.1, I see when running, sa –lint –D that
> there’s a bunch of
Hi all,
Since my upgrade to 3.3.1, I see when running, sa -lint -D that there's a
bunch of stuff, I assume are no longer used?
Like the entry below
Jun 11 12:57:36.792 [18565] dbg: config: warning: score set for non-existent
rule AXB_HELO_LH_HOME
Is there a way to just start clean?
rat
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries
> > in my log
> >
> > I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am
>Just accept the fact that mail gets into a queue when using processes like
>SA. If outgoing spam is not a concern, set your system so that outbound
>mail is not passed thru SA.
I actually only use the exim/sa as incoming filter, I do not send through it.
The reason I was trying to tweak it, ma
Hi all,
I am constantly getting the server reached --max children setting entries in my
log
I started with 10 max children and have been raising it by 2. I am now at 40
, but still getting the messages (though not as often) how high can I go given
these specs:
sa 3.3 on freebsd , hardwar
-Original Message-
> I think it would be easier to just accept only emails for your domain(s) at
> your mta (postfix or exim), then enable the antispam filter on exchange and
> configure it drop (not reject / bounce) any messages to invalid addresses.
That's a very bad idea-- legitima
>
You can use Postfix's probing (or Exim's callout) to query the Exchange
'server' provided it is set up to reject invalid recipients. As pointed
out if this is not done Exchange will happily take any old rubbish and
bounce it some time later. Alternatively have the MTA make an LDAP
callout to AD.
>The only real problem, validating recipients at the front MX, based on
>the data in the backend Exchange servers.
I think it would be easier to just accept only emails for your domain(s) at
your mta (postfix or exim), then enable the antispam filter on exchange and
configure it drop (not
> Can anybody point me in the diretion of a document or place where I
could find information about setting up a
>solo Linux Debian server running spamassassin as a gateway spam filter that
sends the mail along to an exchange server?
I have that exact setup , but I have it running on Freeb
I setup this box YEARS ago, and only updated the versions of sa exim and
clamav, (this only filters my mail before it hands it off to my exchange server.
But lately its been timing out a lot, and I read there's a patch to address
this issue
Freebsd exim clam and sa sw config 3.3
-O
How do apply an SA patch,
Running SA on FreeeBSD
thx
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 136
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: jnat...@familycareintl.org
-Original Message-
From: Jason Bertoch [mailto:ja...@i6ix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:53 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: accepted connection from DNSBL's
On 2010/04/13 2:38 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Well just to confirm I have taken the IP a
-Original Message-
From: Jason Bertoch [mailto:ja...@i6ix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:27 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: accepted connection from DNSBL's
On 2010/04/13 2:11 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> ... I think my blacklists aren't worki
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:jnat...@familycareintl.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:05 PM
To: 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Subject: accepted connection from DNSBL's
Hi all ,
I recently upgraded to sa-3.3.0 and I think my bl
Hi all ,
I recently upgraded to sa-3.3.0 and I think my blacklists aren't working, I'm
getting nailed from servers around the globe that are on the DNSBL list, I did
run sa-update after the upgrade
How can I confirm that the BL rules are working
At 08:32 22-06-2009, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>I copied this rule from someone here on the list
>
>header __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ANY Content-Type =~ /multipart\/\w/i
>ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader
>mimeheader __ANY_TEXT_ATTACH Content-Type =~ /te
Can someone help me out here
I copied this rule from someone here on the list
header __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ANY Content-Type =~ /multipart\/\w/i
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader
mimeheader __ANY_TEXT_ATTACH Content-Type =~ /text\/\w+/i
meta MIME_NO_TEXT (__CTYPE_MULTIPART_A
ue, 2 Jun 2009, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a rule to catch these messages with no body and a 550 bite
>>> word attachment?
>>
>> Can you post a sample somewhere for us?
>
> Hi,
>
> I assume he means the recent surge in "rtf" at
Correction they are rtf not doc
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/IT/SA_Sample/shambling.rtf
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 9:47 AM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: word doc spam
On Tue, 2 Jun
Hi all,
Is there a rule to catch these messages with no body and a 550 bite word
attachment?
thx
The only rule its triggering is the
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 09:23 -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just upgraded to 3.2.5 ran sa-update and I got this message with only
one
> rule tripped
>
> I'm putting a link to the message as well as the headers
>
> If anyone can shed some light
On 30-Apr-2009, at 09:53, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Where did you get the KB_RATWARE rules from?
Karsten Bräkelmann (guent...@rudersport.de)
>> You can find KB_RATWARE_BOUNDARY in my sandbox, where it's still
>> badly
>> named KB_RATWARE_OUTLOOK_08. I need to re
-Original Message-
From: Evan Platt [mailto:e...@espphotography.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:50 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Almost no score
At 09:33 AM 4/30/2009, you wrote:
>>mimeheader DSL4DIG_PNG Content-Type =~ /name\=\"DSL[0-9]{4}\.png\"/
>
>I'd be
-Original Message-
From: LuKreme [mailto:krem...@kreme.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:40 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Almost no score
On 30-Apr-2009, at 07:23, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just upgraded to 3.2.5 ran sa-update and I
Hi all,
I just upgraded to 3.2.5 ran sa-update and I got this message with only one
rule tripped
I'm putting a link to the message as well as the headers
If anyone can shed some light here , I would appreciate it.
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/IT/SA/headers.txt
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/IT/SA/Would%20you
Thanks that did the trick- removed ALL Perl mods and reinstalled exim and sa
Greatly appreciated
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:jnat...@familycareintl.org]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 12:20 PM
To: Mark Martinec; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: 3.2.5
I tried to fetchindex but it failed with
make: don't know how to make fetchindex.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:34 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.2.5 upgrade - getting clobbered
Possibly
UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 10:49 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.2.5 upgrade - getting clobbered
> On 24.04.09 09:56, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > Hi all I just upgraded to 3.2.5 and I went from receiving about 2 spams
a
>
Subject: Re: 3.2.5 upgrade - getting clobbered
> On 24.04.09 09:56, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > Hi all I just upgraded to 3.2.5 and I went from receiving about 2 spams
a
> > day to about 15
> >
> > Did I over look something?
>
> >Did you configure your module
On 24.04.09 09:56, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all I just upgraded to 3.2.5 and I went from receiving about 2 spams a
> day to about 15
>
> Did I over look something?
>Did you configure your modules and configs the same way as before?
>Did you sa-update (and reload spamd)
Hi all I just upgraded to 3.2.5 and I went from receiving about 2 spams a
day to about 15
Did I over look something?
Jean-Paul
I'm sorry all, where / how do I add the -u on spamd?
Thanks,
maybe if you block messages with no rdns record? if its from infected pc's
there shouldnt be a record?
From: Luis Croker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/23/2008 19:56
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Spamassassin+amavis
Hi...
ctory named spamassassin to check where they
are.
Regards.
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:18 -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi all,
I've been out of the loop for a couple of months do a rollout, so I
came back
to my SA today as I have seen A LOT more spam comi
Hi all,
I've been out of the loop for a couple of months do a rollout, so I came back
to my SA today as I have seen A LOT more spam coming in than normal, I
upgraded to 3.2.5 today, and ran sa-update but , i dont seem to see any new
rules, and i;m getting clobbered with spam.
Has something
Hi everyone,
I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my
blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your
existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a
451 error but we have a very good way of detecting virus infected spam
bots
Hi all,
We have been having problems for a couple of days emailing some our
insurance providers- I then emailed them from a hotmail account and it went
through- how can I see if we've been blacklisted
68.167.21.154
Thanks,
jp
-Original Message-
From: Ross Boylan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 3:33 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Connection timed out
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 13:54 -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> OPTIONS="--create-pre
OPTIONS="--create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir \
--username=mail --socketpath=/var/run/spamd/socket"
>I'm running on a Pentium 4 with hyperthreading, which appears as 2 CPU's
>to the OSs. There's really only 1 CPU. I wonder if that could have
>something to do with the troubl
How do I go about shunning the IP - via Exim or via SA?
And where if possible
-Original Message-
From: Jack Pepper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:48 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: netstat info-blacklist IP
Quoting Jean-Paul Natola
I was running in major overloads on my box and I kept noticing entries such
as these
enewsletter11.ru.2500 TIME_WAIT
enewsletter11.ru.2353 ESTABLISHED
enewsletter11.ru.2371 TIME_WAIT
enewsletter11.ru.2350 ESTABLISHED
half of them would eventually time out-
SMTP command timeout on connection
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> If I set the use_bayes 0
>
> Will that negate the training of spam?
>
this will disable the use of bayes completely. After setting that, no
BAYES_* rules should match any email.
>
> I've trained sa with approx 7000 spam messages , yet I
If I set the use_bayes 0
Will that negate the training of spam?
I've trained sa with approx 7000 spam messages , yet I still get the
-2.6 BAYES_00
ram wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 10:23 -0700, Kelson wrote:
>
>> ram wrote:
>>
>>> header __FROMOFFICE From =~/office/i
>>> header __SUBOFFICE Subject =~/office/i
>>>
>>> meta OFFICERULE (__FROMOFFICE || __SUBOFFICE )
>>> score OFFICERULE 4.0
>>>
>> And don't forget to add word
apache.org
Subject: Re: office rule
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 11:07 -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to create a rule that scores 4 points if the word office is in
the
> > From field, or in the subject line
On 02.04.08 21:07, ram wrote:
&
Hi all,
I'd like to create a rule that scores 4 points if the word office is in the
>From field, or in the subject line
Can someone help me there?
thx
J
i have site-wide config, as I only filter the mail and pass it on to
exchange- no ind users setup
I run sa-learn --spam --showdots
J
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/30/2008 21:11
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users
i've trained SA with about 12000 messages that have made it through the
filters , i last trained 1 week ago
Jean-Paul
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 3/30/2008 19:22
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apach
Why does this hit on the most OBVIOUS messages?
Its almost an oxymoron
How can all these rules get triggered
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_34BODY: 3alpha-pock-4alpha
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_64BODY: 6alpha-pock-4alpha
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_82BODY: 8alpha-pock-2alpha
-2.6 B
Hi all,
Our president was unable to communicate with one of her colleagues
After reviewing the logs , I saw her messages were hitting the backhair rule
What exactly is it ?
tia
j
I just started getting a rush of these,
Coincidentally after adding the 50_blogspot and the 30_software rules and
running sa-update
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/samples/russian.txt
the second one is in its original Unicode
ftp://ftp.fcimail.org/samples/russ.txt
J
Hi everyone,
I've tried looking this up and i dunno if i missed the part about the
explanation or not but i couldn't find it.
When training spamassassin with new spam and ham mails does the database
need an existing copy of the emails you trained it with in order to work?
For instance:
i use
Hi all,
I seem to have forgotten where to put acceptable languages in SA
We just got a slew of our colleagues from Spain complaining, and when I
looked the headers I saw
2.8 UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY BODY: Message written in an undesired
language
I guess when I had my "little" SA disas
n) to improve memory efficiency.
Do not know how to set this either--
>6) Pray that some botnet doesn't latch on to you
and obliterate your server!
But that's me. I am assuming your system had a
working configuration with a stock SA installation.
Good luck.
Jean-Paul Nat
day, March 13, 2008 8:44 PM
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Plugin eval failed
On 13/03/2008 8:02 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> What other info should I post?
The output of vmstat while this is happening.
A definition of "constantly". Every message, some % of messages? For
some common
What other info should I post?
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:16 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Plugin eval failed
On 13/03/2008 7:08 PM, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
I upgraded to sa 3.2.4
And I've been restarting spamd every 15 minutes just to keep mail coming in,
This is what is constantly coming up in the maillog
plugin: eval failed: child processing timeout at /usr/local/bin/spamd line
1259.
Any help would be appreciated
Running
Freebsd 6.
From: Tarak Ranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 2/19/2008 7:23
To: Spamassassin
Subject: How to Know
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming & outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
/
Tarak
For incoming, look at the mess
I have * I think* what you are looking for, SMTP traffic goes to my bsd
then after cleaning, scoring, AV checking , it the hands it to Exchange ,
However, I use sitewide configs so u would have to setup individual prefs if
necessary.
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Jean-Paul Natola schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a plugin and/or rule to block russian spam?
>
> Here's a sample
[...]
> Jean-Paul
I think the key is to give special score for "cyrillic chars" (unless
this doesnt affect your regular mails).
Perhaps:
ok
Hi all,
Is there a plugin and/or rule to block russian spam?
Here's a sample
Новейшие базы данных
* Физические лица Москвы и М О 2006 г. (телефоны, прописка,
собственность) 2000 р.
* ГАИ Москвы и М О и Р Ф (авто, владельцы, вод/уд, ДТП, ПДД, розыск)
2007 г. 2000 руб.
* Пенсио
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I was just checking headers on messages that were flagged ( by my own rules
> in outlook) and I'm curious as to what exactly it means
>
I dono, what do your outlook rules do?
> _cbl.abuseat.org_TIMEOUT ,
>
Hi all
I was just checking headers on messages that were flagged ( by my own rules
in outlook) and I'm curious as to what exactly it means
_cbl.abuseat.org_TIMEOUT ,
__dnsbl.njabl.org_TIMEOUT , __sbl.spamhaus.org_TIMEOUT '
Now these emails are by no means spam- they are from the
Hi all,
I'm seeing a bunch of these in my maillog;
prefork: child states: BB
prefork: server reached --max-children setting, consider raising it
This what I currently have set in my startup script
command_args="-d --min-children=2 --max-children=10 --min-spare=2
--max-spare=3 --max-co
-Original Message-
From: winkerbean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:44 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Maybe I'm dense...
but I cannot find anything to tell me whether I can use SpamAssassin in my
situation. I download my messages from my I
Hi, Jean Paul, check this site:
http://www.robtex.com/rbl.html
It does multi RBL checks, saved my butt a few times ;)
Peace,
Luis
2007/8/28, Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I saw that my server wound up on http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml so I had my
> serve
Hi all,
I saw that my server wound up on http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml so I had my
server removed- however , I think I may on other blacklist(s) as I
roadrunner *.rr.com is not accepting emails from our server-
Is there a way I can check my IP to see if I've been blacklisted anywhere
else?
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bob Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:00 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: PDFAssassin
Is anybody using the PDFAssassin module from
http://blog.atmail.com/?p=61
I didn't think I saw it talked about on the list yet.
10:02 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: what happened after 3.1.8?
The fix is in 3.2.3.
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 August 2007 14:
-Original Message-
From: McDonald, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 6:40 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Subject: Re: what happend after 3.1.8?
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 18:30 -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is sort of a re-post , as I ne
esult- so ONCE AGAIN i've
had to downgrade to 3.1.8
is there a pre-requisite to upgrading above 3.1.8? is there something that
I have to do in order to go beyond 3.1.8?
I run
FreeBSD 6.2
CLAMAV
EXIM 4.67
SA 3.1.8
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
F
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
>
> If my init.pre has this line
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
> now I check to see where the plugin actually is
>
> l
.3.gz
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm
Is it going to find/use the plugin - or do I need to specify the full path of
the plugin- ?
Thanks
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite
Hash: SHA1
On 7/25/07 1:32 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> SA 3.2.1 with Postfix
>>
>> What tools are available to measure how many messages SA classifies as
>> spam per hour/day/week?
>
> mailgraph?
>Perfect, thanks. It tracks mail and spam usage (and appar
Hi everyone,
I'm looking over my logs and it *seems* to me that its taking exceessivley
long for these messages to scan, granted I don't have the latest and greatest
hardware, but I rarely if ever use swap - so I don't *think* that it should
take so long-
Here's my top stats
28 processes: 1 run
Hi all,
I had to rebuild my machine and , although I have the 70_ rules, and have run
sa-update, I think I'm missing the CF that catches the gif image spam- the
pharmacy specials
Can someone tell me which one that was
TIA
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Techn
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:06 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: PDF spam
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:50:05PM +0530, Tarak Ranjan wrote:
> i'm getting pdf attached spam. please help me stop that using
>
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm getting creamed with these spams but they are getting
> through due to;
>
>
> -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
> [score: 0.0005]
>
> Why is this happening?
This only says that Bayes
Hi all,
I'm getting creamed with these spams but they are getting through due to;
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0005]
Why is this happening?
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family
amhaus XBL
[64.115.25.140 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
This is one of those stock emails
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone,
I'm curious to know if there's a bug of some sort with 3.2-
These are the symptoms I experience
I get spamd time-outs all over the place, and when I do a netstat I have
dozens of connections to port 783 in the FIN_WAIT stage and it just hangs
till they time out-
I had this problem
From: Jari Fredriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/10/2007 15:22
To: Jean-Paul Natola; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: bayes directory
>>Bayes needs 200 ham & 200 spam to work.
>>You can read it's statistics by com
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:16 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA on iPhone yet?
> on 7/2/07 10:08 PM, Robert - eLists at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Anyone get Spamassassin installed on their iPhone
want this rule to block messages that are addressed to him
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ONLY IF the subject reads
Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
Did I do it correctly?
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
N
WAIT
Is there something I missed during the upgrade?
I'm downgrading to 3.18 to see if it changes anything-
FreeBsd 5.5
Exim
CLAM
SA
Well that worked- downgrading to 3.18 seems to have "fixed" my connection
problem
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Techno
WAIT
Is there something I missed during the upgrade?
I'm downgrading to 3.18 to see if it changes anything-
FreeBsd 5.5
Exim
CLAM
SA
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 3
Sorry all
I just panicked -
I didn't know that upgrading would replace my startup script - So I just
added the arguments back into the startup script.
-Original Message-
Now that I added the arguments back to my startup script for SA my CPU usage
is getting nailed
43 processes
Sorry all
I just panicked -
I didn't know that upgrading would replace my startup script - So I just
added the arguments back into the startup script.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:41 PM
To:
Hi all
I just upgraded to 3.2
Now every message is timing out-
If anyone has any ideas can you CC me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As no messages are coming in THANKS
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY
These should* not be related should it?
_
My current settings are as follows
command_args="-d --min-children=2 --max-children=14 --min-spare=2
--max-spare=3 --max-conn-per-child=100 -r
BSD 5.5
EXIM 4.67
SA 3.2
Jean-Paul Natola
Ne
should* not be related should it?
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Ok I was able to track them and found that they are timing out after about
5
> mins- spamd is timing them out- I'm assuming its large messages that it is
> timing out on- what rule/acl would I need and WHERE would I enter it to
> tell SA to ignor
39
Average clean message score :-18.02
How can I track the messages that are causing this to happen?
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mail
ssage score :-18.02
How can I track the messages that are causing this to happen?
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a limit to how many entries a whitelist can have and still run
efficiently?
The box is a PIII 550 512 ram-
Its now scanning approx 3000 messages per day-
Someone asked me if it was possible to add their entire address book (
roughly 600 addresses) to the whitelist ( we have sitewide
Hi everyone,
Curious to know why this scored ( well didn't score) this way;
0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_1 Appears to be advance fee fraud (Nigerian 419)
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:09:07PM +0100, jpff wrote:
> is a flurry of mail I get timeouts from spamd, and then errors about
> deleteing unallocated memory in spamassassin, and no mail is
If you're getting errors about dealing with memory, that's perl and not
SpamAssassin. FYI.
I'm stepping
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:18:20AM -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> I know it not recommended to run spamd as root-, however during the install
Really? Where do you get that impression? Running it as root is the
default and how most people use it. However, running as few processes as
r
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
