I appear to be getting a shakedown scam from Barracuda Networks.
You are not being shaken down, but you might be slandering. ;-)
I'm fairly certain that BN isn't making much profit off of your $20.
What they are getting is your commitment, and your ID, that one or
more IP addrs under your
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:26:54 -0400
Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dianne Skoll
you should not have to pay for delisting one IP.
and with BN you are NOT paying for a delisting
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
you should not have to pay for delisting one IP.
and with BN you are NOT paying for a delisting.You are paying for
the upfront ID validation and verification process that goes into
fast-tracking your email flow.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
Updates were broken by two issues. 1st, there is a bug in svn with files
with spaces with mod svn. I introduced a file with a space while preparing
the 3.4.1 release.
Forgive me if this sounds incendiary, it's not meant
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Many moons ago, obviously before you started using SA, what you *now*
consider dynamic, was very static with less than than handfull of changes
/release.
There's some pointless blabber in that as well. ;-)
Irregardless of last
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 2/10/2015 9:13 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I would guess I missed the cutoff for yesterday's masscheck and tomorrow's
will include it.
Rule gen just finished and the update does include the fix if you want to
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 2/10/2015 9:00 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com
wrote:
On 2/9/2015 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what is that below introduced with tonights update
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 2/9/2015 4:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what is that below introduced with tonights update and get triggered now
for every single mail and why does such things not automatically get caught
before push?
It was part
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
I guess the $64K question is, does the new rule that's version dependent
Increase the spam catch Because if it does, then I don't regard it as a
problem. Instead, I want it!
The real $64K question is: If you really want
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
Hello
Anyone else seen this in v3.4.0?
sa-learn --dump magic
Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 530) line 2.
Argument perl_version isn't numeric in numeric ge (=) at (eval 1023) line
2.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Steve Bergman sbergma...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest you join the SDLU list where you can discuss anti spam
philosophy.
Thanks. I suggest that you consult for an ISP-dependent business someday.
;-)
It's an education, too.
-Steve
Just a heads-up... that
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 6/9/2014 2:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 6/9/2014 1:23 PM, Patrick Domack wrote:
Comparing my list of new domains, shows that DOB seems to pick them up
after they are
On Apr 30, 2014 5:09 AM, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net wrote:
On 04/30/2014 11:00 AM, Axb wrote:
On 04/30/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
Am 2014-04-30 10:23, schrieb Axb:
On 04/30/2014 10:10 AM, Michael Storz wrote:
Are there any plans for a DMARC plugin for SpamAssassin? Reacting
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 j...@j4computers.com wrote:
What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
was taken were met by reject messages.
Quite simply put, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wants you to respect his
signature, which reads:
senders that
On May 7, 2013 1:01 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 j...@j4computers.com wrote:
Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com 05/07/13 12:13 PM
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 j...@j4computers.com
wrote:
What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
was taken were met
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Dave Funk dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Am 22.03.2013 22:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
are spamass-milter using spamc ?
On 23.03.13 00:34, Robert Schetterer wrote:
at my knowledge
spamass-milter uses
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
spamass-milter also supports --socket, so it is not limited to only spamc.
And... that is wrong. Anything passed to spamass-milter after --
(i.e. --socket=...) is passed on to spamc.
-Jim P.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Jason Haar jason_h...@trimble.com wrote:
OT but related
I just got a bunch of phishing attacks against a bank come through.
Following the link leads me to some owned website with the fake bank
frontend - and it had a feature that I've seen time and time
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 13:55, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Normally rules get updated every day, via sa-update. They weren't
for the last couple months due to a clock on a server being set wrong:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6671
Interesting. In my mind, it's a
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 13:51, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/19, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Is the missing entity one person, several people, many people? Was
there an untimely death? I believe everyone is now aware
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 21:46, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:25:25 +
Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Very well. DNSMasq setup and running local, yet still returns HI
AFAIK DNSMasq isn't a recursive nameserver, it's just a DNS forwarder.
Correct.
pdns_resolver is
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:26, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 10/05, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:41, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
The usual reason for a hiatus is that too much spam or ham has aged-out
in the corpora, and a top-up is needed.
I think it's more
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:15, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it wrote:
Why Google name server returns an incorrect value?
Because sometimes the Google name servers overload the upstream system
and get blocked. The same thing happens if you use the Level 3
servers (4.2.2.x). You would be better
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 17:41, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
The usual reason for a hiatus is that too much spam or ham has aged-out
in the corpora, and a top-up is needed.
So, how do we get it top-up'ed?
-Jim P.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 09:39, Michael Scheidell
michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote:
On 10/4/11 3:07 AM, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
Hi,
Is it me or has it been a long time since there has been an update to the
spamassassin ruleset?
what is 'long'?
Since 27-Aug-2011 ?
$ ll
25 matches
Mail list logo
