) and if we fail to block a spam it can appear we are the
source.
and ?, do you see your own logs who use spamcop.com as rbl ?
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/spamcop.com
users of wot dont trust them
o rly:
https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/spamcop.net
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider
mails
you've already accepted on their behalf (sounds like this may be the
case) do you then generate a bounce? Could some of those bounces be what
caused the listing in the first place?
Just throwing some ideas out there..
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
, it appears your message did not
trigger the rule...
Subject: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0
tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
Maybe a string of multiple words separated by underscores is not
considered multiword...
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider
be preserved?
Probably.
This would allow me to continue to use gpg I could ditch google and use ANY
mail forwarding agent - even hushmail - and I could keep my professional
life intact.
I'll take your word for it.
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
of
the setups that does not reject your mails?
FWIW, it looks as though the SA instance that apache is using in front
of the mailing list is *not* tagging your posts as spam:
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0
tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
HTH
--
Joe Sniderman
On 02/10/2012 02:16 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
The cluster with which I am facing problem is different one.
The node for which I am getting high spam score has the following details:
cloudemail5.cpgtest.ostinet.net (184.72.247.145)
No other Received lines?
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider
to upgrade it.
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
On 02/08/2012 12:22 PM, Joe Sniderman typed hurriedly:
IOW, 196.254.0.0/16 no longer matches as of 3.3
Well, I meant to type 169.254.0.0/16... but then.. obvious typo is obvious.
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
of domains hosted on the nameservers, as
well as the average length of time that the domains hosted on the
nameservers have been on those specific nameservers...
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
for whatever reason, the
authentication-results header would still be there.
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
to require a preexisting email
address, however gmail addresses are accepted for that purpose.
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
with the last mx's ip in the error
message and the 4xx too many
Interesting. My experience has been that Yahoo does retry at the same MX
but will not go to the next MX in response to 4yx errors. (OTOH if the
connection times out they do go on the next MX)
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider
On 01/25/2011 02:29 PM, JKL wrote:
Hi there,
Is there a mailing list specifically for problems arising from
spamass-milter?
There is a spamass-milter mailing list, yes:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
HTH
--
Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org
13 matches
Mail list logo