On 22-mrt-2007, at 20:02, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:55:07AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Where bayes used to be the centerpiece of spam filtering ...
FWIW, I don't think Bayes has really ever been the centerpiece of
spam filtering. Definitely not within SA anyway.
On 20-nov-2006, at 23:33, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I'm using SA for a long time without any problem, nowadays
spammers are using too much graphical objects and they are tring to
change it day by day. I'm tring to use fuzzyocr but it's taking too
much cpu. I think
On 17-nov-2006, at 9:26, Maccie Roux wrote:
Hi there. I'm getting the following in my maillog, can someone
please help
me:
postfix/qmgr[25394]: warning: connect to transport smtp-amavis:
Connection refused
Well, that is about as clear as a warning can get. What don't you
understand
On 17-nov-2006, at 12:59, Maccie Roux wrote:
Hi all.
My spam is being block with amavis but it does not send it to my
junk mail box. Here is my amavisd.conf file:
# $timestamp_fmt_mysql = 1; # if using MySQL *and* msgs.time_iso is
TIMESTAMP;
# defaults to 0, which is good for non-MySQL
On 13-nov-2006, at 9:03, Ramprasad wrote:
I am no getting what the spammer intends to say here
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/spam1.txt
There is no meaningful message , no sales pitch , no stock
recommendation nothing at all
Any ideas ?
Hmm, preemptive Bayes and/or AWL poisoning perhaps?
On 9-nov-2006, at 16:17, Randal, Phil wrote:
As someone has probably already pointed out... admins use these
lists because they trust their accuracy. If they receive too
many complaints (as we did with a particular DNSBL) you stop
blocking on that list and move to only scoring.
No, you move
On 6-nov-2006, at 19:59, Claus Westerkamp wrote:
Hello list,
Id like to modify the Score output of spamassassin. I want 3digits
display permanently (e.g. ***(Score002.3)*** or ***(Score102.3)*** )
Is this possible? I want it to be able to sort the spam-messages by
Score.
Of course
On 6-nov-2006, at 21:30, Rob Anderson wrote:
Leander Koornneef [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/06/06 02:26PM
As far as I
know, there is no configuration option for this.
SNIP NONSENSE
Try this from the docs under Template Tags:
_SCORE(PAD)_ message score, if PAD
On 30-okt-2006, at 10:03, Matthias Haegele wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi list, i'm new in spamassassin, I have all the system configured
( I
think )
but I have a question, when a spam message arrive the spamassassin
mark it
as the **spam*, then the message going to my
Those kinds op spam are hitting all kinds of rules here, including
rulesets from SARE:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.1 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0
tests=BAYES_99, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, HTML_10_20, HTML_MESSAGE,
MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2, MY_CID_AND_CLOSING, MY_CID_AND_STYLE,
I suggest you start here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
spamassassin/branches/3.1/UPGRADE
Anyhoo, the upgrade is nothing to be scared of; certainly not if you
know what you're doing.
Seeing that you're using sendmail, I assume that you've probably got
some (gray) hair on your chest
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Leander Koornneef wrote:
Those kinds op spam are hitting all kinds of rules here, including
rulesets from SARE:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.1 tagged_above=-999.0 required=3.0
tests=BAYES_99, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, HTML_10_20, HTML_MESSAGE,
MY_CID_AND_ARIAL2, MY_CID_AND_CLOSING
On 29-okt-2006, at 7:38, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I've just downloaded this and set it up. I see there are MANY rulesets
I can choose from, but I have no idea if they are all 'safe' (not even
sure what I mean by that). Is there a subset of all these rulesets,
that everybody uses, or does
On 29-okt-2006, at 16:33, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get
the SARE
rulesets from the channel provided by http://
saupdates.openprotect.com/.
This negates the necessity to run
On 29-okt-2006, at 17:55, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my experience, using the default sa-update channel, the
openprotect
channel, auto-whitelisting, proper bayes training(!), pyzor, razor,
dcc, SPF
and DNS blacklists wil get
say that DCC is better than Razor. It catches some that Razor
misses, but Razor seems to catch more than DCC misses. 95% of the
time they are identical in result.
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
--
Leander Koornneef
ICS B.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ic-s.nl
ICS
not at all
worried by it.
Incidentally, the breakdown looks like this:
Type Total%
---
All Messages 119528 100
Spam 9816882
Spam w/Razor2 4905441
Percent of Spam w/Razor250
--
Leander
It looks like the process is getting killed from an external signal.
Maybe this is the Linux OOM killer in action? What is the memory/swap
status of this machine? Have you tried running sa-learn with the -D
option?
Leander
On 29-jul-2006, at 0:31, Steven Scotten wrote:
The bayesian filter
Or perhaps there is some other form of resource control in place.
What's the output of ulimit -a?
Leander
On 29-jul-2006, at 14:22, Leander Koornneef wrote:
It looks like the process is getting killed from an external signal.
Maybe this is the Linux OOM killer in action? What is the memory
Hi,
I think I also ran into this recently. The following fixed it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude install db4.2-util
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# db4.2_upgrade /path/to/bayes_db
Or something along those lines
You should probably make a backup of the bayes db before you blindly
copy/paste these
20 matches
Mail list logo
