On 8 Dec 2020, at 12:47, Grant Taylor wrote:
I think that the strict RFC specification does allow for multiple
senders, but I don't remember how it's done and it's so rare that I'd
accept the false positive.
Yes to both.
-lem
On 24 Jul 2020, at 12:22, John Hardin wrote:
Does that certificate include some kind of checksum of the logo image
itself?
If not, what is to prevent a spammer from obtaining all the needed
certificates, and then changing the logo image they are hosting to
match the entity they are spoofing?
On 23 Jul 2020, at 0:56, Laurent S. wrote:
BIMI requires DMARC, which is much easier to implement if you are a
phisher creating a brand new domain .xyz with all the right SPF, DKIM,
DMARC and BIMI. Putting the paypal logo on that .xyz domain and there
you go. Your regular legit company will ofte
On 22 Jul 2020, at 23:14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
However, I have questions of adoption rate, impersonation concerns,
anticompetitive concerns, and privacy concerns. This just sounds like
a
commercial tracking pixel but the devil is in the details.
The pilot will shake things out more I imag
On 19 Jul 2020, at 10:54, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Great question. That's really a third party rule. I would like to
see it
change eventually but maybe that's another phase. Thoughts?
My thoughts are to delay any further social/political motivated name
changes until after the extents of th
On 14 Jul 2020, at 10:10, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Kevin,
If my words or position had any chance of modifying course, I would
certainly do so again. But as you say further down, the "hullabaloo" of
people trying to present other points of view, is pointless.
Luis, the article I quoted was we
On 14 Jul 2020, at 9:53, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I agree with you about the idea of turning off everything and just
delivering 100% commented configuration files.. I believe SA is a
framework that must have walls & paint added to make it a house.
Others
want it ready to go as a pre-fab house
On 14 Jul 2020, at 9:24, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Here's a well researched
and documented article from a medical journal on the topic with expert
citations: https://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/490 The
abstract
says it very well: "This commentary addresses the widespread use of
racist
l
On 10 Jul 2020, at 23:51, Bill Cole wrote:
"Terribly offended" is not what I've heard from anyone but the issue
has been raised by Black colleagues a few times in multiple contexts,
as Yet Another Minor Annoyance in a world stuffed full of such little
things.
Reminds me of left-handed people
On 10 Jul 2020, at 12:29, @lbutlr wrote:
If people are so fragile that they have to hold on to terms that are
extremely offensive to some of their peers, they will get more spam.
Oh noes.
I keep hearing about this mythical people that get terribly offended by
the use of these words. I've bee
I am having a hard time reconciling the statements below.
On 10 Jul 2020, at 13:21, Bill Cole wrote:
We have no way of knowing how many people have thought less of SA
because of terminology or whether any of those people might have
otherwise become involved enough in the project to be contribu
On 3 Jan 2020, at 8:02, Kris Deugau wrote:
I have a local rule adding a couple of points for anything coming
direct-to-MX from any Amazon compute node, period.
⋮
Reality has intruded and there are in fact static IP assignments in
the .compute.amazonaws.com tree (as well as ISP customers of our
On 25 Mar 2019, at 13:02, David B Funk wrote:
For example, I've seen increasing amounts of spam which contain cloud
based URLs in the body of the message (worthless for URIBL filtering)
which may also contain URLs in the headers that are specific to the
spammer source (thus viable targets for
On 28 Feb 2019, at 11:53, Mike Marynowski wrote:
There are many ways to determine what the root domain is. One way is
analyzing the DNS response from the query to realize it's actually a
root domain, or you can just grab the ICANN TLD list and use that to
make a determination.
What I'm proba
On 23 Jul 2018, at 23:40, Pedro David Marco wrote:
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 12:07:52 AM GMT+2, David B Funk
wrote:
What kind of 'calculations with that IP' ?
Thanks Dave... calculations are complex and done with a an external
script that reads some files parsing them...
Depending o
On 1 Jun 2018, at 5:12, @lbutlr wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 15:34, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
To further the point, one of the mailboxes I manage on this box has
95K+ messages. Apple Mail would choke to dead on this one.
Not at all. I have folders in mail.app with more than twice that
number of
On 30 May 2018, at 14:30, Bill Cole wrote:
And if you can imagine this, both Thunderbird and MailMate choke on
large mailboxes *even more* than Mail.app does.
I haven't had MM "choke" on large mailboxes in recent years. I wish
Benny would just declare a 2.0 release to make it clear that MM t
On 30 May 2018, at 13:54, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History
Museum and open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be
seeing movement there in. I think I've seen some references to
p
On 3 Mar 2018, at 3:54, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/03/2018 11:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Noel Butler wrote:
On 03/03/2018 04:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
-0.2 RCVD_IN_IADB_RDNS RBL: IADB: Sender has reverse DNS record
[199.127.240.84 l
On 2 Mar 2018, at 0:48, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
But why does SA have to expose a rule for each and every code IADB
provides?
So that users can implement their own policies if desired? So that
different rules can have a more granular effect on the inbound email
flow, without this being a simpl
On 1 Mar 2018, at 11:54, Miles Fidelman wrote:
[...] and sometimes turn on VERP to narrow things down to an
individual. It's all made so much worse by morons who confuse the
"spam" button with their "delete" key when using webmail from a big
provider. Sigh...)
Out of curiosity, why turn off V
On 1 Mar 2018, at 10:29, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I know I have brought up this issue on this list before, and sorry for
the persistence, but having 7 different rules adding scores for the
IADB whitelist still seems either ridiculous, or outright suspect:
(Disclaimer, I have inner visibility in
On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:59, John Hardin wrote:
How often would we see a valid registered domain name like "x.info"
for example?
This is not as rare as you would think. Those names are more expensive,
but not insanely so.
https://uniregistry.link/premium-domain-names/
Best regards
-lem
On 22 Sep 2017, at 10:43, John Hardin wrote:
He was only proposing the subject. Essentially it sounds like a
subjectBL service.
In the same message he said
"The next level would be sending the message headers and eventually -
the full message."
Best regards
-lem
Mark,
This certainly does not add confidence in the "techniques no one else is
using":
```
⋮
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
host darwin.ctyme.com [184.105.182.171]
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
550-FAKE-REJECT - TLD-FROM [click] is blocked - X=darwin
⋮
```
25 matches
Mail list logo
