* blocklist
* [URIs: fluent.ltd.uk]
* 1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL
* blocklist
* [URIs: fluent.ltd.uk]
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
rbra...@ohww.norman.ok.us
e
AC> free DNSBLs. We are non-profit organization and don't have too
AC> much email traffic.
Your organization should be free to use the Spamhaus DNSBLs at no
charge. I personally do not block on bl.spamcop.net, but it does add
a score of 2.0 in SA.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
rbra...@ohww.norman.ok.us
SMTP authentication. As a result,
I am now able to block based on PBL listings.
This alone has blocked about 80% of the spam outright at the SMTP
session level that was previously coming in and then being filtered
by SpamAssassin as well as ClamAV.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
rbra...@ohww.norman.ok.us
pped my mail logs and found that my wife and I are among many
other users on my system that receive legitimate, desired mail that
is delivered through CC.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
rbra...@ohww.norman.ok.us
ep hits from spammers hiding behind open-relays and other
R> exploited servers, but that seems unlikely with CSS.
Zen includes the SBL. The SBL includes CSS.
If you are blocking at the SMTP level using Zen, there is no point
in doing additional lookups in SA.
--
Best regards,
Robe
ll with that, (as you apparently are since you're
posting here with obvious frustration), finding some examples of
messages that got sent to a recipient's spam folder by Spamassassin
may be helpful, as the headers will often indicate the rules that
were triggered.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ll tag and score messages that claim to be from the
Bat that it can tell isn't really (just as is does for obviously
false Outlook x-mailer headers). The only problem is that this rule
falsely fires sometimes on messages that have been relayed through a
mailing list.
--
Best regards,
Ro
least. I've been using it now for over 5 years.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou one)
Opt-out applies only if there is an existing business relationship
with the recipient, and several other requirements are met.
The rules haven't changed w/r/t typical junk faxes... you can(and
indeed we are) nailing them for the first fax, last fax, and every
fax in between.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and spammers), and am clearly
sympathetic to Spamhaus' plight here. However, there is nothing I
can see in the record to fault the court on in this case. Spamhaus
apparently intends to appeal, so we'll just have to see what issues
are raised.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sed
for lack of personal jurisdiction, that was not an issue that the
court had an opportunity to decide.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t judgment and injunction to be entered against it.
A default judgment is not a determination on the merits.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday, October 15, 2006, 5:21:38 PM, R Lists06 wrote:
>> Blame the plaintiffs, blame what some might consider to be
>> less-than-stellar legal advice given Spamhaus, but don't blame the
>> court for following the law.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>&g
rendered against me.
Blame the plaintiffs, blame what some might consider to be
less-than-stellar legal advice given Spamhaus, but don't blame the
court for following the law.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
st perhaps a starting point for some questions for their
attorney.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ted. In those areas, CAN-SPAM is the law of the
land.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
body is in a
position to expend the time and resources to do something like this
on principle.
If you have a good case, good statutory damages, and a defendant
that's a going concern or otherwise has assets, seek out an
attorney or law firm willing to take the case on a contingency
basis.
--
Best regards,
Robert Braver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
