your browser at http://www.perl.org/, the Perl Home Page.
> On May 15, 2023, at 8:52 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>
> Subroutine NetAddr::IP::STORABLE_freeze redefined at
> /usr/local/lib64/perl5/NetAddr/IP.pm line 365.
So the exim error I see is something like this
2023-05-17 13:16:14 1pyvlo-0006AM-0v internal problem in userforward router
(recipient is elast...@lhvm02.lizardhill.com): failure to transfer data from
subprocess: status=0100 readerror='No such file or directory’
Now the userforward filter I have
I remember writing in the past about what I saw in the debugger when running SA
3.4.6
It seems that 4.0.0 seems even noisier.
Again this is my programmatically calling SpamAssassin in a perlscript.
I’ve checked and I didn’t find any other version of NetAddr::IP in the @INC
Subroutine NetAddr::
I remember writing in the past about what I saw in the debugger when running SA
3.4.6
It seems that 4.0.0 seems even noisier.
Again this is my programmatically calling SpamAssassin in a perlscript.
I’ve checked and I didn’t find any other version of NetAddr::IP in the @INC
Subroutine NetAddr::
I just updated from 3.4.0 to 3.4.6 and the output in perl debugger when I
programmatically using SA is quite noisy.
Where can I find 3.4.1 etc so I can incrementally update from 3.4.0 so I can
see where the dramatic change is coming from?
When I use my script in the debugger from 3.4.0 there is
Well I appear to have gotten it working..
For now everything works if I simply comment out the NetAddr::IP in NetSet.pm
On Apr 10, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Robert Nicholson
wrote:
> My first attempt an integrating 3.4.0 (hopefully to solve the DnsResolver.pm
> Invalid Argument issue) ends u
My first attempt an integrating 3.4.0 (hopefully to solve the DnsResolver.pm
Invalid Argument issue) ends up with
Subroutine NetAddr::IP::STORABLE_freeze redefined at
/usr/local/lib64/perl5/NetAddr/IP.pm line 362.
at /usr/local/lib64/perl5/NetAddr/IP.pm line 362.
NetAddr::IP::import("Ne
From this
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/commits/148538
it looks like it was a bug
how can I configure dccifd is not available instead of SA trying to figure it
out the long way?
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Use of uninitialized value in spri
Use of uninitialized value in sprintf at
/home/elastica/SALOCAL-3.3.0/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Logger.pm
line 241.
at
/home/elastica/SALOCAL-3.3.0/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Logger.pm
line 241
Mail::SpamAssassin::Logger::_log(3, 'dcc: dccifd is not a
I think I've solved this issue already.
I had the add_header etc but I hadn't yet enabled the TextCat plugin.
On Feb 13, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 13.02.10 08:08, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>> I still need to do some debugging as it works sometim
How many spamassassin's do you have?
Isn't it saying the script in bin isn't matching the modules in lib
On Feb 13, 2010, at 6:02 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Help, I dared to update from SVN, and now spamassassin refuses to run:
> $ svn update
> $ make install
> $ sa-update --install http:
riginal X-Spam-Languages header from the message.
is this a bug?
My understanding is that it should remove all X-Spam headers when reprocessing
the message?
On Feb 12, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 10:50 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>> I have
>>
>&g
t Kettler wrote:
> On 2/12/2010 10:50 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
>> I have
>>
>> Feb 12 19:35:31.669 [81642] dbg: textcat: X-Languages: "en",
>> X-Languages-Length: 424
>>
>> in my testing
>>
>> but the X-Spam-Languages ends up
I have
Feb 12 19:35:31.669 [81642] dbg: textcat: X-Languages: "en",
X-Languages-Length: 424
in my testing
but the X-Spam-Languages ends up with nothing
I have in my user_prefs
add_header all Languages _LANGUAGES_
Perhaps my confusion lies in the fact that it looks like headers != metadata?
Is there a way or setting that allows metadata to result in headers in the
message?
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Is there anyway to get his header to stick rather than one looks like
Feb 12 17:20:38.635 [16073] dbg: message: decoding other encoding type
(binary), ignoring
in the debug output but I don't see this header in the final message that had
it's metadata added.
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> Is there anyway to get his he
Is there anyway to get his header to stick rather than one looks like now where
it is removed during check presumably after Bayes has been able to do it's
thing?
I have no problem with the header staying on my Spam messages.
So how is it possible then to arrange the installation of the each version of
SA into a separate directory but yet still share a common site_perl amongst
these versions?
The scripts like sa-update etc seem to assume that SA is installed into the
site_perl and not a separate directory for this v
So in the past I was able to get away with using perl Makefile.PL
PREFIX=~/SALOCAL-3.3.0
where all of this versions files would end up in this directory
however I also have additional site_perl stuff outside of this tree that I want
SA to see such as NetAddr::IP for example.
How now is this po
5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl
wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:25:00 -0600:
> What is the convention being used here for encoding these mulitbyte
> chars?
I'd say none :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://w
Can anybody tell me what convention are these Mail headers using?
What is the convention being used here for encoding these mulitbyte
chars?
From: ""
Reply-To: ""
To: rob...@elastica.com
Subject:
<>
!
What have people been using to curtail some of the new disaster spam that's
quite common now?
I usually don't use BAYES
Things like
*Man killed by flying cocktail glass*
*A-rod dropped from team*
*Obama withdraws support for Israel*
If I'm not mistaken it doesn't show non standard headers and also
doesn't appear to allow the viewing of mime attachments. So it's quite
difficult to see exactly what the spam assassin headers/report look
like from an iphone's native mail client.
So it looks like Entire Message doesn't let you search header content.
Anybody found a way to reliably search on the X-Spam-Report or X-Spam-
Status in Mail.app?
Is there anything that checks the ratio of letters to non letters?
T+h,i,s g*e m is re,ally m+ovable.!! T h.i's o n-e is r+eally
pr.ofitab*le!!!
I'd imagine it could help with these?
Can't call method "learn" on an undefined value at Mail/SpamAssassin/
PerMsgLearner.pm line 133.
at Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgLearner.pm line 133
I can understand this but also consider another approach that if
_you_ don't use bayes.. ie. this is the error that is shown when it's
turned off b
I can understand this but also consider another approach that if
_you_ don't use bayes.. ie. this is the error that is shown when it's
turned off but you still call "learn"
possibly it would be nicer to fail gracefully instead of assuming a
reference to bayes exist if learn is called?
so I have to make two calls to learn?
ie. one to forget and another to relearn?
never is learning combined with forgetting right?
Why would I be all of a sudden getting a terse report in the body of
my messages?
This is with 3.2.0
Did you try using debug to see where SA is picking up it's
configuration then?
On May 12, 2007, at 1:45 PM, David Kramer wrote:
In /usr/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf
at the top of that file is says
# SpamAssassin basic config file
#
# Please don't modify this file as your changes
so I know the tools in bin let me pass the option when I'm not using
~/.spamassassin
however I maintain mulitple version of SA and switch b/w them and I
use VERSION/.spamassassin for my configuration.. so I programatically
create my SA instance using
my $PREFIX = '/home/user/SALOCAL-3.2.0
SpamAssassin is configured to add the header when it's spam and not
when it's ham.
you can change that
add this
add_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_
and it will keep the header in both cases.
On May 4, 2007, at 4:51 AM, BrianSebby wrote:
We recently put an Ironport anti-spam appliance in fro
{
ignore_mail($mail);
} elsif ($spamtest->call_plugins('check_illegal_chars', $pms,
'ALL','0.010','2
'))
{
ignore_mail($mail);
}
}
On May 6, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:06:42PM +0700, Robert Nichol
Looks like the API has changed a little bit?
Can't locate object method "check_for_faraway_charset_in_headers" via
package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus"
sub handle_potential_faraway
{
my $mail = shift(@_);
$spamtest = new Mail::SpamAssassin({
PREFIX => $PREFIX,
DEF_RULES_DIR
Looking at the regular expressions it looks like Spammers are easily
working around these rules sets by adding "ed" or "ing" to the word
in question as it doesn't look like the rulesets consider this.
All of that said why would it still eventually give up then and let
the mail thru without
any attempt to filter?
On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:37 AM, David Goldsmith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
I'm running the following mail chain:
fetchmail -> p
So this code does a pretty good job of keeping out Asian spam
$spamtest->init(1);
my $check_mail = message_from_string_or_arrayref($mail->as_string);
my $msg = Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus->new($spamtest,
$check_mail);
if ($msg->check_for_faraway_charset_in_headers())
{
igno
Well then I only care about tokens and not repeated emails can I
disable seen?
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:17:36PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
So you're saying that right now seen isn't capped like tokens right?
seen has n
So you're saying that right now seen isn't capped like tokens right?
On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:42:13PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Why then is my Bayes DB 20MEG in size right now if
=item bayes_expiry_max_db_size
Why then is my Bayes DB 20MEG in size right now if
=item bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default: 15)
What should be the maximum size of the Bayes tokens database? When
expiry
occurs, the Bayes system will keep either 75% of the maximum value, or
100,000 tokens, whichever has a larger
Can anybody tell me how you are suppose to completely disable the
user configuration?
I do not want ~/.spamassassin and if I must create this directory I
want it relative to prefix as I
maintain two different releases of SA installed into a shell
account's home directory. Since I'm
the only
So I've got a message
who's body is quoted printable as in chinese
but this method
sub check_for_faraway_charset {
my ($self, $body) = @_;
my $type = $self->get('Content-Type');
my @locales = $self->get_my_locales();
return 0 if grep { $_ eq "all" } @locales;
$type = get_charset_f
)))
{
ignore_mail($mail);
}
On Feb 10, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 06:30:50PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I'd like to programatically call the methods SA uses to check for
8bit charsets and the like but I personally do not care to make use
of t
Can anybody tell me if this looks at meta tag content types as in?
kr">
likewise is this considered excessive quoted printable chars?
Illegal chars gets this one but if they weren't used none of the
charset/illegal rules would
work for this message.
--.802_DA_C.5.8FC3CB
Content-Type: text/
Can anybody tell me why the argument is passed for raw tests and then
subsequently ignored later?
# generic test version
sub check_for_mime {
my ($self, undef, $test) = @_;
$self->_check_attachments unless exists $self->{$test};
return $self->{$test};
}
for instance the body array goes
sif ($msg->check_for_faraway_charset_in_headers())
{
ignore_mail($mail);
} elsif ($msg->html_charset_faraway())
{
ignore_mail($mail);
} elsif ($msg->check_for_mime('mime_faraway_charset'))
{
ignore_mail($mail);
}
}
On Feb 10, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007
I'd like to programatically call the methods SA uses to check for
8bit charsets and the like but I personally do not care to make use
of the rules engine at all. Do I need an instance of PerMsgStatus
fully setup before I can call eval: methods programatically?
For instance I already have
m
ld NOT be used.
When compiling gocr, make sure you enable NetPBM support, otherwise,
results are not as good
Please read OS specific notes when installing from RPMs
On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Seeing this error today with FuzzyOCR 3.5.1
Only saw this one time
Subrouti
There' s a bug logged that suggests ignoring these but that's a
little slack isn't it since for instance when used with exim causes
all mail to be bounced because there's activity on stderr.
This is with 3.5.1
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_CREAT redefined at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/
Exporter.pm
Seeing this error today with FuzzyOCR 3.5.1
Only saw this one time
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_CREAT redefined at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/
Exporter.pm line 65.
at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/POSIX.pm line 19
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_EXCL redefined at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/
Exporter.pm l
Ok managed to do this by hacking the FuzzyOcr.pm code.. just changed
the if condition and hopefully this drug image spam is history.
On Jan 28, 2007, at 8:32 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
So currently FuzzyOCR is not getting hit on this drug spam however
I'd like to force the recogniti
So currently FuzzyOCR is not getting hit on this drug spam however
I'd like to force the recognition of this image as spam for future by
generating a hash and adding an entry into the hash database that
this email is spam
How can I do that?
I want to manually add an entry to the hashin
Well I cannot see why for myself can I? I mean in this case it's
simply not matching any of the words when they are clearly visible.
On Jan 27, 2007, at 8:16 PM, René Berber wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Fuzzy OCR isn't getting any hits on this mail. Anybody know why?
[snip]
Y
Calculating the image hash...
[2007-01-27 19:30:43] Debug mode: Hash not yet known to the database,
saving for later db storage...
[2007-01-27 19:30:43] Debug mode: FuzzyOcr ending successfully...
On Jan 27, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Fuzzy OCR isn't getting any hits on thi
Fuzzy OCR isn't getting any hits on this mail. Anybody know why?Begin forwarded message:From: "ernest.buttiens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: January 27, 2007 5:36:40 PM CSTTo: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: LOG! nuclear defendantReceived: fr
At this time I'm forwarding mail that SA considers spam to my gmail
account. The following bounces with
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.185.27]:
552 5.7.0 Illegal Attachment g5si5192165wra
error
None of the rules indica
Well if you are learning it as spam and not ham then it will push up
the probablity of the words contained in the spam. So mail with those
words is most likely to be affected with Bayes. so you may want to
reduce the score of the bayes rules if you think they are not going to
be accurate. Or start
Is there anything in SA that can trap these messages?
If is_charset_ok_for_locales isn't going to catch this what is?
SUBJECT_EXCESS_BASE64 etc won't work because they only look at
whether it needs to be based64 encoded or not.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?windows-1251?B?wPLo6u7iY
From: "=?utf-8?b?15PXldeo15nXqiDXkteV15zXk9eR16jXkg==?="
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: =?utf-8?b?
15fXmdeh15XXnCDXntec15DXmSDXnteq16DXlCDXnNeZ15zXk9eZ150=?=
These display as Hebrew
Ok my bad. For some reason when it attached the message I didn't
include the original headers of the message so it didn't have the
original content type to display the message/rfc822 attachment.
On 1/3/07, Robert Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my log mailbox ie. a
In my log mailbox ie. a mailbox where I record the original headers
for a message and a comment explaining how it was processed ie. which
rules made it a candidate for rejection or what it matched to
determine which folder it was moved to I do something very similar to
report_safe ie. add a
In my log mailbox ie. a mailbox where I record the original headers
for a message and a comment explaining how it was processed ie. which
rules made it a candidate for rejection or what it matched to
determine which folder it was moved to I do something very similar to
report_safe ie. add a
If you are using report_safe then you can see by looking at
rewrite_report_safe in Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus.pm that it
orders the attachments such that the report is first and the original
is second.
You could easily reverse those.
$newmsg .= <<"EOM";
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type
Do you have report safe on or off?
On Jan 2, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Rick Vestal wrote:
It has been requested that I move the report generated by spamassassin
(summary, content preview, etc) to the bottom of the email. Reading
about, I
haven't found any way of doing this, nor anyone else inquiring
Are there any plugins that use String::Approx as used by FuzzyOCR but
used to match non-image spam?
Ok found the problem
It seems the samples in FuzzyOCR won't fire because of the default
focr_autodisable_score
It might be worthwhile making a mention of that somewhere when
performing the tests.
"These eml files are sample spam emails to test your installation of
FuzzyOCR. As
sumin
Fuzzy OCR plugin doesn't appear to be working as expected. Can
anybody tell from this log why it's not firing with the sample images
that come with the plugin?
The Plugin seems to be loading ok and I did once see it create the
logfile but it doesn't anymore.
$ perl ~/perlscripts/filter.pl
Trying to setup FuzzyOCR
Here's what I get
$ ./configure --prefix=$HOME --with-netpbm=/usr/local/lib --verbose
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for
Ok looks like that only applys on windows which isn't clear from reading
BUILD_SPAMC' ,# Set to 'no' to skip build of spamc.
at the top of Makefile.PL
On Dec 30, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Just like to add that this
$ perl Makefile.PL BUILD_SPAMC=no
Just like to add that this
$ perl Makefile.PL BUILD_SPAMC=no
has no effect with this code
On Dec 30, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Anybody else getting this?
gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/
utils.c -o spamc/spamc
spamc/libspamc.c: In function
Anybody else getting this?
gcc -g -O2 spamc/spamc.c spamc/getopt.c spamc/libspamc.c spamc/
utils.c -o spamc/spamc
spamc/libspamc.c: In function `transport_setup':
spamc/libspamc.c:1706: error: `EAI_ADDRFAMILY' undeclared (first use
in this function)
spamc/libspamc.c:1706: error: (Each undec
Is this practical without static ip?
Yeah that was appreciated but in my case I don't have control over
the MTA for my domain.
All of that said why isn't there any check for foreign language
subjects in SA right now?
On Nov 19, 2006, at 11:08 AM, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Is there any test that tests for high bit characters in the _header_?
I cannot find one and I notice this causes me to receive korean spam
that's all image.
This is Japanese
# Japanese: Peter Evans writes: iso-2022-jp = rfc approved, rfc 1468,
created
# by Jun Murai in 1993 back when he didnt have white hair! rfc
approved.
# (rfc 2237) <-- by M$.
'ja' => 'EUCJP JISX020119760 JISX020819830 JISX020819900
JISX020819970 '.
'JISX0212
so what is the conclusion to this issue?
why when I set ok_locales to it th en does it allow any Charset with
"Windows" in the name
to bypass that setting?
Why is it that is_charset_ok_for_locales written to give exceptions
sub is_charset_ok_for_locales {
my ($cs, @locales) = @_;
$cs =
So I'm trying to send information about issues to the list but it's
being flagged as spam.
:
140.211.11.133 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 spam score (14.2) exceeded threshold
On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Correct but before
It use to be
$body = join("\n", @$body);
if ($self->are_more_high_bits_set ($body)) {
return 1;
}
and now it's
$body = join("\n", @$body);
if ($pms->are_more_high_b
Where is EvalTests.pm now then?
On Nov 12, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
[6858] dbg: rules: ran eval rule TVD_SPACE_RATIO ==> got hit (1)
rules: failed to run CHARSET_FARAWAY test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "are_more_high_bits_set" v
[6858] dbg: rules: ran eval rule TVD_SPACE_RATIO ==> got hit (1)
rules: failed to run CHARSET_FARAWAY test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "are_more_high_bits_set" via
package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at /home/robert/TRUNK/lib/
perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassi
trunk version, I would suggest you keep it
on a separate server.
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Are the configuration files backward compatible?
If I add short circuit entries to my config file will that file
only work with the trunk code?
ie. are unrecognised configuration directives simply ignored
Is anybody using SpamAssassin in conjunction with OSX Server 10.4 and
is it simply to simply upgrade the SA release independent of what
ships with OSX Server and keep all the GUI configuration working?
Also since the Changes file doesn't appear to have been updated in a
long while how can I learn the differences b/w each release/trunk code?
On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
R
thing is version specific.
On Nov 12, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Stuart Johnston wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:06:15PM -0600, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
When will the Shortcircuit feature be made available in a release?
The Shortcircuit plugin should be availab
When will the Shortcircuit feature be made available in a release?
erent from RBL type solutions.
On Nov 10, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, November 11, 2006 02:31, Robert Nicholson wrote:
header URICOUNTRY_GB eval:check_uricountry('URICOUNTRY_GB')
what if a spammer sends mails from another ip outside GB ?
imho such rules only
Here's the solution I use
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URICountry
uricountry URICOUNTRY_GB GB
header URICOUNTRY_GB eval:check_uricountry('URICOUNTRY_GB')
describeURICOUNTRY_GB Contains a URI hosted in GB
tflags URICOUNTRY_GB net
score URICOUNTRY_G
I took a quick look at the trunk source and I don't quite see the
tflags short circuit option you mentioned.
On Nov 7, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
So today is it possible to simply do a head test and if it
indicates unwanted
language or whatever to not scan the body?
If by "tod
so short circuting tflags is only available on the trunk code?
On Nov 7, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
So today is it possible to simply do a head test and if it
indicates unwanted
language or whatever to not scan the body?
If by "today" you mean using the currently unreleased trun
I'm looking to run SA on some mailing list mail that's constantly
getting bombarded by asian spam.
So I would like the check to be as efficient as possible such that as
soon as I know the mail has asian character sets or unwanted language
I don't want it to check
any more. Any chance I can
I've got plugins that are running and if they are positive I really
don't need to run any more plugins.
Q. Do all plugins run against a message or can you configure things
so that one plugin aborts the running of others?
in my init.pre I have
# URIDNSBL - look up URLs found in the message
It looks like I get by the URICountry plugin but I have a question
about that.
why does it use IP::Country::Fast instead of IP::Country::Medium
since it's not doing the lookup by ip but by URI which is by name
more often than ip address.
On Sep 22, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Robert Nich
I have a need to isolate any mail that contains a UK phone number. I
would expect there's a plugin that does something already?
So,
I'm looking at mail being sent to my domain and it's overwhelmingly
mail people who don't exist at my domain.
examples
165(new):From: "Wilford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
166(new): To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
167(new): Subject: Enjoy the newest Every man wants it Be delighted with
174(new)
So do you frequently expect to get mail with words as images then? I
mean are you saying that SA doesn't spots there without it? Can I see
an example of a message that only OCR scored as spam?
On Sep 15, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Robert S wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145939 for g
ail::SpamAssassin::Locales::is_charset_ok_for_locales($1, @locales)
returns true
Mail::SpamAssassin::Locales::is_charset_ok_for_locales(/home/robert/
lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locales.pm:91):
91: return 1 if ($cs =~ /^WINDOWS/); # argh, Windows
what?
On Sep 10, 2006, at 4:38
rge. Unless the Received header it's checking is one that's
guaranteed to be outside of the senders network.
On Sep 10, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Robert Nicholson wrote:
If you converted all times to GMT and compared them against now
and if they were > now h
perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Locales.pm:91):91: return 1 if ($cs =~ /^WINDOWS/); # argh, Windowswhat?On Sep 10, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Robert Nicholson wrote:Why didn't foreign charset rules catch this?Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: September 10, 2006 2:17:51 PM CDTT
Why didn't foreign charset rules catch this?Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: September 10, 2006 2:17:51 PM CDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: פריצת דרך מאתגרתX-Spam-Dcc: : grub.camros.com 1113; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=3X-Spam-Flag: YESX-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03
gt;Date: September 10, 2006 2:21:20 PM CDTTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re: Drink it, forget it ! bug in _check_date_diffI haven't read any of the rest of this thread, but I'll respond to the latest...Robert Nicholson wrote: Well either way. Assuming that the lowest numbere
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
