the list. Or what would be
better would be a don't send me any list traffic for 2 weeks kind of
option.
Well I shall be thinking of you all fighting the good fight as I lay on
the beach sipping brandy sours. Keep up the good work, never give a
spammer and even break I say.
Cheers all
Ron
--
Ron
RCVD_IN_SBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL
[222.65.54.104 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
Do we need to do something for it to check the black.uribl list?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:51 +0530, Rakesh wrote:
Ron McKeating wrote:
Is it possible to have a standard setting that does not put a full
report in the header for normal users, but does for one or 2 selected
users?
Ron
Are you directly using Spamc or using Amavis or MailScanner
came from ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
. Centralva.net ...
-Original Message-
From: Ron McKeating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 7:31 AM
To: spam
Subject: sare lists
Hi all, we have started using several of the sare lists with
rules_du_jour. We have the onfu oem fraud antidrug adult lists
://67.67.32.202/rules/70_sare_header2.cf
Has anybody else seen this or I have we got a problem with our config?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Thanks to all of you who replied about the job offer spams. Could
anybody point at the best site for the latest rulesets and an
explanation of what each one does.
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:53 +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
Ron,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:23:24AM +0100, Ron McKeating wrote:
Thanks to all of you who replied about the job offer spams. Could
anybody point at the best site for the latest rulesets and an
explanation of what each one does
viruses.
For further information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Is it just us or is there a flood of spams subject job offer, is there
any of the rulesets that take care of this ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 10:32 +, Dennis Davis wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Ron McKeating wrote:
From: Ron McKeating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: spam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:17:19 +
Subject: surbl errors
Hi, we are running SA 3 and using surbl. We wanted to change
Hi all,
Apologies for cross posting this on the SA and exim list but there are
many years of experienced linux email managers on the two lists.
I am still frequently getting an error from our cron job. The cron entry
is
service spamd restart
and the log entry is
Feb 4 14:15:00 bill spamd:
We have a cron job which shuts down spamd and restarts it every hour.
Since we upgraded to the latest version of SA 3 one of our server keeps
giving this error.
Shutting down spamd: [ OK ]
Starting spamd: Could not create INET socket on 127.0.0.1:783: Address
already in use (IO::Socket::INET:
Hi we run all our incoming email through spamassassin (uptodate as of
last month) we notice however that a disproportionate number of emails
from hotmail get false positived. Is anybody aware of a reason for
this ?
Ron
PROTECTED] account. I really do disagree with this
wholesale blacklisting of people who are perfectly responsible internet
users, who happen to have their own mail-server on their cable lines.
Ron
-Jim
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:54, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:01 AM 10/6/2004, Ron McKeating wrote:
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops
now nobody will see this email.
SA can, does
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops
now nobody will see this email.
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509
-
From: Ron McKeating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 October, 2004 3:01 PM
To: spam
Subject: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]
Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles unless
SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis
be worthwhile and some idea
of how many would like to attend.
Ron
PS our conference centre is at
http://www.welcometoimago.com/index.php?id=10burleighcourt/
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
Has anybody noticed a high proportion of false positives from clients
using lotus notes ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
and they are all lotus
notes users.
Ron
Ron McKeating wrote:
Has anybody noticed a high proportion of false positives from clients
using lotus notes ?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
22 matches
Mail list logo