Thanks for the feedback - I've created the attachment with a sample spam.
Sandy
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: **
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:22:18AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> something may be broken. Be sure to include at least
> the full URI in your bugzilla. It may be standard procedure
> is to attach the full message.
Yeah, the URI itself is pretty useless to us.
The instructions are on the "create a ne
On Monday, September 27, 2004, 7:57:27 AM, Sandy S. wrote:
> URIDNSBL: query for dkcw.wneiis-planet.info took 2 seconds to look up
> (multi.surbl.org.:dkcw.wneiis-planet.info)
> debug: URIDNSBL: query for tvuu.wneiis-planet.info took 2 seconds to look up
> (multi.surbl.org.:tvuu.wneiis-planet.info)
Jeff Chan wrote:
> I'd need to read the source code, but for a .info, urirhssub
> is probably checking the second level domain, i.e.
> wneiis-planet.info . It may be checking at the third levels
> also: tvuu.wneiis-planet.info and dkcw.wneiis-planet.info .
>
> In either case it should not be timin
On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 11:54:14 AM, Sandy S wrote:
> I did find these lines in the debug output:
> debug: URIDNSBL: domains to query: tvuu.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info
> dkcw.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info
> and
> debug: URIDNSBL: queries completed: 0 started: 0
> debug: URIDNSBL: queries a
On Thursday, September 23, 2004, 10:22:03 AM, Ulysses Cruz wrote:
> Ironically, my system marked your post as spam specifically because of the
> URIBLs.
Usually it's recommended to not process anti-spam mailing list
messages with anti-spam tools for this reason.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAI
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:54:14PM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> Apparently the lookups timed out. I assume that's something to do with the
> fact that it's checking for tvuu.wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info instead of just
> wneiis-MUNGEDplanet.info, but I don't know enough about how the URI RBLs
> work t
- Original Message -
From: "Ulysses Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> > Ulysses -
&
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> Ulysses -
> Thanks for your advice. I'm pretty sure we have all the needed perl
> modules, since 99% of the time the URIBL rules are working just as they're
> supposed to. It's only on those one or two .info domains that they don't
>
- Original Message -
From: "Ulysses Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:44:39PM -0500, Sandy S. whispered:
> > Thanks f
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Goods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Sandy S'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: {Spam?} Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> Sandy S scribbled on Thursday,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:44:39PM -0500, Sandy S. whispered:
> Thanks for your response - that's very interesting! We're running
> Spamassassin 3.0 on FreeBSD 4.9, using spamd/spamc called via procmail. I
> do have a bunch of custom rulesets, mostly pulled from the SARE site:
> 70_sare_uri.cf, 9
- Original Message -
From: "Ulysses Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> > I'm
uld have never seen this.
Here's the header of your message on my box.
From: "Sandy S"
To:
Subject: {Spam?} Problems with URIDNSBL Under Spamassassin 3.0?
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:52:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Conten
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:52:03AM -0500, Sandy S whispered:
> I'm in the process of upgrading to Spamassassin 3.0 and am currently running
> my email through the new version of Spamassassin. I just had an email slip
> through that should have been caught by the URIDNSBL lookups - it's listed
> in
15 matches
Mail list logo
