On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Savoy, Jim wrote:
I may be able to answer my own question, as something like this was
asked a few weeks ago and John Hardin said that AWL is a misleading
name, as it is just giving an "average" score, not necessarily
whitelisting something. Thanks John.
...glad to help! :
>127.0.0.1 is not remote host :/
>did you send it for testing ?
Nope. This was a real, live message from the outside world.
>make sure that exim do send remote ip to sa, else it will work
badly, also that exim does not accept and bounce, i have seen it, if
its spam then reject
I'm pretty sure o
Hi all,
I just noticed that we have had auto_whitelisting turned off since
2005 (!). I just turned it
back on (first deleting the auto_whitelist file in
/home/exim/.spamassassin (we run a site-wide
installation) and ensuring that file was re-created after restarting
spamd). It seems to
On Mon, April 6, 2009 19:44, Savoy, Jim wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just noticed that we have had auto_whitelisting turned off
> since 2005 (!). I just turned it
>
> back on (first deleting the auto_whitelist file in
> /home/exim/.spamassassin (we run a site-wide
> installation) and ensuring that file wa
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 11:44 -0600, Savoy, Jim wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
>I just noticed that we have had auto_whitelisting turned off since
> 2005 (!). I just turned it
>
> back on (first deleting the auto_whitelist file
> in /home/exim/.spamassassin (we run a site-wide
>
> installati
I may be able to answer my own question, as something like this was
asked a few
weeks ago and John Hardin said that AWL is a misleading name, as it is
just giving an
"average" score, not necessarily whitelisting something. Thanks John.
Thanks for your answer,
> > I have seen the awl contains email address with the value 'none' in
> > the field 'IP'.
> >
> > Why this field for some entriesis not correctly filled?
>
> Perhaps it could be that mail was submitted locally (not with
> SMTP), over IPv6 or that the IP address couldn'
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 11:24, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> I use SA storing data on MySQL databases.
>
> I have seen the awl contains email address with the value 'none' in the
> field 'IP'.
>
> Why this field for some entriesis not correctly filled?
Perhaps it could be that mail was submitted
Hello,
I use SA storing data on MySQL databases.
I have seen the awl contains email address with the value 'none' in the
field 'IP'.
Why this field for some entriesis not correctly filled?
Thanks,
rocsca
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 1:57 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AWL question: which score?
> Yes, but that's the historical average. It is no
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Using sql based AWL, this target:
> select * from awl where email like "%peppers%";
> +--+---++---+---
> ---+
> | username | email | ip | count |
> totscore |
> +--+--
Michael wrote:
> Using sql based AWL, this target:
> select * from awl where email like "%peppers%";
> +--+---++---+---
> ---+
> | username | email | ip | count |
> totscore |
> +--+---
Using sql based AWL, this target:
select * from awl where email like "%peppers%";
+--+---++---+---
---+
| username | email | ip | count |
totscore |
+--+---++
> From: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Lysator ACS
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:10:47 +0100
> To:
> Cc: Jon Essen-Moller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: AWL question
>
> Jon Essen-Moller skrev:
>> Shouldn't addresses in the A
Jon Essen-Moller skrev:
> Hej Magnus,
>
> Tack för snabbt svar. Följfråga dock. Vet du ifall "sa-learn --ham
> $file" påverkar awl poängsättning?
>
Please stick to English on the list. No, sa-learn only updates the bayes
database. It doesn't affect awl.
--
Magnus Holmgren
signature.asc
Desc
Hej Magnus,
Tack för snabbt svar. Följfråga dock. Vet du ifall "sa-learn --ham
$file" påverkar awl poängsättning?
/jon
Magnus Holmgren said the following on 2006-02-22 12:10:
Jon Essen-Moller skrev:
Shouldn't addresses in the AWL result in points being subtracted?
Kä
Jon Essen-Moller skrev:
> Shouldn't addresses in the AWL result in points being subtracted?
Käre Jon,
This is probably the most frequently asked question of them all. AWL
adds or subtracts points towards the previous average score of the
sender. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AwlWrongWay
Hi, I'm using SA 3.01 on a RedHat 8 box.
Sometimes spam points are added and the logs refer to the AWL list.:
---
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on mail.local
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=0.4 required=0.2 tests=AWL autolearn=h
First, the AWL isn't a whitelist. Period. It's a score averager.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
> I have a particular address whitelisted via "spamassassin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
No, that command does not whitelist a sender.
It adds ONE message scored at -100 to the sender's
Richard Ozer wrote:
> I have a particular address whitelisted via
> "spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> It works for a while, but then comes back reported as spam after a
> week or two.
This is "normal" due to the way the AWL works.
> I recieve mail from this user, tagged with AWL, as well as B
I have a particular address whitelisted via
"spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
It works for a while, but then comes back reported as spam after a week or
two.
I recieve mail from this user, tagged with AWL, as well as BAYES40. However
there are a couple of spammy rules fired that seem to over
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:29:40PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> Scott Johnson wrote:
> >After upgrading to SA 3.0, I noticed a lot of spam with subject lines
> >including SEXUALLY- EXPLICIT started to get through, even though there
> >were existing rules that were meant specifically to catch them. I
Scott Johnson wrote:
After upgrading to SA 3.0, I noticed a lot of spam with subject lines
including SEXUALLY- EXPLICIT started to get through, even though there
were existing rules that were meant specifically to catch them. I first
boosted the score of the rules that catch these messages from
After upgrading to SA 3.0, I noticed a lot of spam with subject lines
including SEXUALLY- EXPLICIT started to get through, even though there
were existing rules that were meant specifically to catch them. I first
boosted the score of the rules that catch these messages from 10 to 100
(2 rules,
24 matches
Mail list logo
