-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hamish Marson wrote:
> Loren Wilton wrote:
Yeah, I know about the SPF checks... But I meant does SA
currently do anything with digital signatures to verify that
the sender really is the sender & apply a -ve score.
>>> Other than the SPF
Hamish Marson writes:
> Loren Wilton wrote:
> >> Yeah, I know about the SPF checks... But I meant does SA
> >> currently do anything with digital signatures to verify that the
> >> sender really is the sender & apply a -ve score.
> >
> > Other than the SPF type header checks I don't believe so.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton wrote:
>> Yeah, I know about the SPF checks... But I meant does SA
>> currently do anything with digital signatures to verify that the
>> sender really is the sender & apply a -ve score.
>
> Other than the SPF type header checks I don't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
> Hamish Marson writes:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>> Hamish writes:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 08:48, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Given that airline messages are important, are rel
Hamish Marson writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Hamish writes:
> >> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 08:48, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >>> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Given that airline messages are important, are related to
> meney, and recipients dont want to get forged ones, it
> Yeah, I know about the SPF checks... But I meant does SA currently do
> anything with digital signatures to verify that the sender really is
> the sender & apply a -ve score.
Other than the SPF type header checks I don't believe so. Certainly not any
pgp blocks or the like in the body of the ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Mason wrote:
> Hamish writes:
>> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 08:48, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Given that airline messages are important, are related to
meney, and recipients dont want to get for
Hamish writes:
> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 08:48, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Given that airline messages are important, are related to meney, and
> > > recipients dont want to get forged ones, it would be a great idea to
> > > start a campaign with a
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 08:48, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Given that airline messages are important, are related to meney, and
> > recipients dont want to get forged ones, it would be a great idea to
> > start a campaign with airlines / travel agents to
Hi Loren, everyone
Loren Wilton wrote:
bayes token 'visa' => 0.997839158297152
bayes token 'refund' => 0.997646909307943
bayes token 'drinks' => 0.997585038685398
bayes token 'NUMBER' => 0.990398319296953
bayes token 'nights' => 0.98853871069642
This suggests you are still on 2.6x. It is poss
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Given that airline messages are important, are related to meney, and
> recipients dont want to get forged ones, it would be a great idea to
> start a campaign with airlines / travel agents to use some sort of
> proof of origin (spf, digital signature, wha
>> > Although our SA setup works very well in general, one issue that has
>> > come up a few times recently is airline E-tickets/reservations.
>>
>> Travel stuff in general seems to be designed specifically to hit as many
>> spam rules as possible. *Everything* from Travelocity and Alaska Air get
> bayes token 'visa' => 0.997839158297152
> bayes token 'refund' => 0.997646909307943
> bayes token 'drinks' => 0.997585038685398
> bayes token 'NUMBER' => 0.990398319296953
> bayes token 'nights' => 0.98853871069642
This suggests you are still on 2.6x. It is possible that upgrading to 3.x
or 3.1
> Although our SA setup works very well in general, one issue that has
> come up a few times recently is airline E-tickets/reservations.
Travel stuff in general seems to be designed specifically to hit as many
spam rules as possible. *Everything* from Travelocity and Alaska Air get
around 20 poin
Title: RE: Airline reservations get tagged
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Boven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:13 AM
> To: Spamassassin Users List
> Subject: Airline reservations get tagged
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Al
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Although our SA setup works very well in general, one issue that has
come up a few times recently is airline E-tickets/reservations. These
tend to be ALL CAPS and have quite a few other trigger words. Our
company seems to do business with more than one travel-
* Paul Boven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Although our SA setup works very well in general, one issue that has
> come up a few times recently is airline E-tickets/reservations. These
> tend to be ALL CAPS and have quite a few other trigger words. Our
> company seems to do business wi
Hi everyone,
Although our SA setup works very well in general, one issue that has
come up a few times recently is airline E-tickets/reservations. These
tend to be ALL CAPS and have quite a few other trigger words. Our
company seems to do business with more than one travel-agent, so just
white
18 matches
Mail list logo
